Chief Counsel Advice 1036019 Released September 10, 2010 Advice

CCA 1036019: Late entity-classification relief under Revenue Procedure 2009-41

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel advice addressed how a service center should process a request under Revenue Procedure 2009-41 when the requested effective date for an entity-classification election is more than three years and 75 days before filing. The advice suggests granting relief only to the date permitted by the procedure and advising the taxpayer that a private letter ruling may be used to seek the earlier date. It also explains why the 60-month limitation on changing an entity classification should not prevent that later ruling from restoring the intended effective date.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: How should a late request under Revenue Procedure 2009-41 be handled?
  • Outcome: Advice given
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. § 301.7701-3(c)(1)(iii); Rev. Proc. 2009-41

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2010062513112731 Number: 201036019
Release Date: 9/10/2010
Office: ----------------
UILC: 7701.00-00, 9100.31-00

From: --------------------
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 1:11:31 PM
To: --------------------------------------------
Cc:
Subject: RE: Rev. Proc. 2009-41

  --------------------
      You first asked how you should process a request for relief if the taxpayer submits a request
      under Rev Proc 2009-41, but the request is filed more than 3 years and 75 days after the
      requested effective date for the entity classification election?

      We would suggest that the Service Center simply grant relief for the date 3 years and 75 days
      prior to the filing date and that the Service Center send a generic letter indicating that the relief
      was limited to this date due to the late filing. (This would be consistent with 301.7701-3(c)(1)(iii)).
      The letter could also suggest that the taxpayer may still be able to receive the requested effective
      date by filing a private letter ruling request. The 60 month rule shouldn't be a problem if the PLR
      grants the relief because the taxpayer would just be receiving permission to have its intended
      classification effective earlier.

      For example, if I filed today May 26th under the Rev Proc to make my intended entity
      classification election effective January 1, 2007 (date of formation), I would be past the 3 year 75
      day limit. So the Service Center would make my election effective as of March 12, 2007. I could
      then request a PLR for January 1, 2007 through March 12, 2007 without being impacted by the
      60 month rule, because once the Jan 1, 2007 effective date is granted via the PLR, the Service
      Center should treat the me as if I made an intial classification on January 1, 2007, so I would still
      have my one free change available. If my January 1, 2007 election was a change in
      classification, the 60 months would run from that January 1, 2007 date.

      Thanks

       ---------------------
      ----------

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.