PLR 1036011: 120-day extension granted for GST exemption allocation
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The IRS granted a surviving spouse an additional 120 days to allocate available generation-skipping transfer tax exemption to transfers made to two trusts. The spouses had consented to split the gifts, but their accountant prepared the gift tax returns without making the GST exemption allocation. The IRS found that the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional and that the requirements for relief under section 301.9100-3 were satisfied. The allocation will be effective as of the dates of the transfers, using the values determined for federal gift tax purposes. The supplemental gift tax returns must be filed with a copy of the ruling attached.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May the taxpayer receive extra time to allocate GST exemption after the allocation was omitted from the gift tax returns?
- Outcome: Approved
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 2513, 2631, 2642, and 301.9100-3; Notice 2001-50
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201036011 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 9/10/2010 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
Index Number: 2642.00-00, 9100.00-00 ------------------------, ID No. ------------
Telephone Number:
-------------------------- --------------------
-------------------------- Refer Reply To:
------------------------------ CC:PSI:B04
RE: PLR-153748-09
-------------------------------- Date:
--------------------------- June 03, 2010
Legend
Husband = ----------------------------------------------------
Wife = ----------------------------------------------------
Accountant = ----------------
Trust 1 = ---------------------------------------------------------
Trust 2 = ---------------------------------------------------------
Year 1 = -------
Year 2 = -------
Date 1 = -----------------------
a = -----------
Dear --------------------:
This responds to your letter dated December 8, 2009, requesting an extension of
time under § 2642(g) of the Internal Revenue Code and § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure
and Administration Regulations to make an allocation of your generation-skipping
transfer (GST) exemption to transfers to Trusts 1 and 2.
The facts and representations submitted are summarized as follows:
On Date 1, in Year 1, Husband established Trust 1 and Husband’s wife, Wife,
established Trust 2 for the benefit of their descendants. In Year 2, Husband transferred
$a to Trust 1, and Wife transferred $a to Trust 2. Husband and Wife consented to treat
the gifts made in Year 2 as being made one-half by each pursuant to § 2513.
Husband and Wife hired Accountant, an accountant, to prepare their Forms 709,
United States Gift (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Returns, for Year 2.
Accountant prepared the Forms 709, but failed to allocate GST exemption on those
returns.
You have requested an extension of time under § 2642(g) and § 301.9100-3 to
allocate your available GST exemption to the transfers made to Trusts 1 and 2 in
Year 2.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 2513(a)(1) provides that a gift made by one spouse to any person other
than the donor's spouse is considered for purposes of the gift tax as made one-half by
the donor and one-half by the donor's spouse, but only if at the time of the gift each
spouse is a citizen or resident of the United States.
Section 2513(a)(2) provides that the gift is treated as made one-half by each
spouse only if both spouses have signified (under the regulations provided for in
§ 2513(b)), their consent to the application of § 2513(a)(1) in the case of all gifts made
during the calendar year by either while married to each other.
Section 2513(b)(2)(A) provides that the consent under § 2513(a)(2) may be
signified at any time after the close of the calendar year in which the gift was made.
However, the consent may not be signified after the 15th of April following the close of
such year, unless before the 15th day no return has been filed for such year by either
spouse, in which case the consent may not be signified after a return for such year is
filed by either spouse.
Section 2601 imposes a tax on every generation-skipping transfer. A generation-
skipping transfer is defined under § 2611(a) as (1) a taxable distribution, (2) a taxable
termination, and (3) a direct skip.
Section 2602 provides that the amount of the tax is the taxable amount multiplied
by the applicable rate. Section 2641(a) defines applicable rate as the product of the
maximum federal estate tax rate and the inclusion ratio with respect to the transfer.
Section 2631(a), as in effect for the years at issue, provides that for purposes of
determining the GST tax, every individual shall be allowed a GST exemption of
$1,000,000 which may be allocated by such individual (or his executor) to any property
with respect to which such individual is the transferor. Section 2631(b) provides that
any allocation under § 2631(a), once made, shall be irrevocable. Section 2631(c), as in
effect for the tax years at issue, provided that the $1,000,000 amount under § 2631(a) is
to be adjusted for inflation for calendar years after 1998 and before 2004.
Section 26.2632-1(b)(2) of the Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Regulations
provides that an allocation of GST exemption to property transferred during the
transferor's lifetime, other than in a direct skip, is made on Form 709.
Section 2642(b)(1) provides that, except as provided in § 2642(f), if the allocation
of the GST exemption to any transfers of property is made on a gift tax return filed on
or before the date prescribed by § 6075(b) for such transfer or is deemed to be made
under § 2632(b)(1) or (c)(1) the value of such property for purposes of § 2642(a) shall
be its value as finally determined for purposes of chapter 12 (within the meaning of
§ 2001(f)(2)), or, in the case of an allocation deemed to have been made at the close of
an estate tax inclusion period, its value at the time of the close of the estate tax
inclusion period.
Section 2642(g)(1)(A) provides that the Secretary shall by regulation prescribe
such circumstances and procedures under which extensions of time will be granted to
make an allocation of GST exemption described in § 2642(b)(1) or (2), and an election
under § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5). Such regulations shall include procedures for requesting
comparable relief with respect to transfers made before the date of the enactment of
§ 2642(g).
Section 2642(g)(1)(B) provides that in determining whether to grant relief under
this paragraph, the Secretary shall take into account all relevant circumstances,
including evidence of intent contained in the trust instrument or instrument of transfer
and such other factors as the Secretary deems relevant. For purposes of determining
whether to grant relief under this paragraph, the time for making the allocation (or
election) shall be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute. See Notice 2001-50,
2001-2 C.B. 189.
Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards used to determine whether to grant
an extension of time to make an election whose date is prescribed by a regulation (and
not expressly provided by statute). In accordance with § 2642(g)(1)(B) and Notice
2001-50, taxpayers may seek an extension of time to make an allocation described in
§ 2642(b)(1) or (b)(2) or an election described in § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5) under the
provisions of § 301.9100-3.
Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer
provides the evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the
taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice
the interests of the government.
Section 301.9100-3(b)(1)(v) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted
reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax
professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax
professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.
Based on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that
the requirements of § 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Therefore, Wife is granted an
extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter to make an allocation of her
available GST exemption, with respect to the transfers to Trusts 1 and 2 in Year 2. The
allocation will be effective as of the respective date of the transfer to the Trusts and the
value of the transfer to the Trusts as determined for federal gift tax purposes will be
used in determining the amount of Wife’s exemption to be allocated to the Trusts.
These allocations should be made on a supplemental Form 709 for Year 2. The
Form 709 should be filed with the Cincinnati Service Center at the following address:
Internal Revenue Service, Cincinnati Service Center - Stop 82, Cincinnati, OH 45999. A
copy of this letter should be attached to the supplemental Forms 709. A copy is
enclosed for this purpose.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this
letter is being sent to your authorized representatives.
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied
concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this letter.
The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and
representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury
statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the
material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on
examination.
The rulings in this letter pertaining to the federal estate and/or generation-
skipping transfer tax apply only to the extent that the relevant sections of the Internal
Revenue Code are in effect during the period at issue.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
Sincerely,
Associate Chief Counsel
Passthroughs & Special Industries
_________________________
By: James F. Hogan
Chief, Branch 4
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)
Enclosures
Copy for § 6110 purposes
Copy of this letter
cc:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.