CCA said branch manager employee status depends on a fact-specific balancing test
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Office of Chief Counsel advised that whether branch managers are employees under the usual common-law rules depends on a balancing test based on the facts and circumstances of each situation. The advice did not establish a categorical rule for branch managers.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Are branch managers employees under the common-law rules used to determine an employer-employee relationship?
- Outcome: Advice given
- Key authorities: IRC § 3121(d); IRC § 6110(k)(3) not-precedent notice
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2010081015084630 Number: 201035020
Release Date: 9/3/2010
Office: -----------------------------
UILC: 3121.04-01
From: ------------------
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 3:08:47 PM
To: ---------------
Cc:
Subject: RE: IRC 3121(d) ---------
Appears helpful. Bottom line is every situation will be a balancing test based on its own facts and
circumstances as to whether the branch managers have the status of employees under the
usual common law rules applicable in determining the employer-employee relationship.
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.