CCA said branch manager employee status depends on a fact-specific balancing test
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Office of Chief Counsel advised that whether branch managers are employees under the usual common-law rules depends on a balancing test based on the facts and circumstances of each situation. The advice did not establish a categorical rule for branch managers.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Are branch managers employees under the common-law rules used to determine an employer-employee relationship?
- Outcome: Advice given
- Key authorities: IRC § 3121(d); IRC § 6110(k)(3) not-precedent notice
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2010081015084630 Number: 201035020
Release Date: 9/3/2010
Office: -----------------------------
UILC: 3121.04-01
From: ------------------
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 3:08:47 PM
To: ---------------
Cc:
Subject: RE: IRC 3121(d) ---------
Appears helpful. Bottom line is every situation will be a balancing test based on its own facts and
circumstances as to whether the branch managers have the status of employees under the
usual common law rules applicable in determining the employer-employee relationship.
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace