Private Letter Ruling 1035008 Released September 3, 2010 Approved

PLR 1035008: IRS granted extra time to allocate generation-skipping transfer tax exemption

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS considered a donor who created an irrevocable trust and failed to allocate available generation-skipping transfer tax exemption to later-created trusts for the donor’s children and descendants. The donor had sufficient exemption remaining, and no taxable distributions, taxable terminations, or other generation-skipping transfer tax events had occurred. The IRS granted 60 days to make the allocations, effective as of the original transfers, because the donor had reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional who failed to make the allocation. The IRS did not rule that the trusts would have zero inclusion ratios as a result.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the donor make late allocations of generation-skipping transfer tax exemption to four trusts?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 2601, 2611, 2631, 2632, 2641, 2642, and 6110; Treas. Reg. §§ 26.2632-1 and 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201035008
Release Date: 9/3/2010
Index Number: 2601.00-00, 9100.00-00 Person To Contact:
--------------------, ID No. ------------
Telephone Number:


                                                          --------------------

--------------------------- Refer Reply To:
----------------------------------- CC:PSI:B04 – PLR-111635-10
Date: May 24, 2010
RE:
-------------------------
--------------------

      Legend:

      Donor = --------------------------
      -------------------------------------
      Date 1 = ------------------
      Trust = -------------------------------------------------------
      Child 1 = -----------------------------------
      Child 2 = -------------------------------
      Child 3 = -----------------------------------
      Child 4 = ---------------------------------------------
      Trust 1 = ------------------------------------------
      Trust 2 = --------------------------------------
      Trust 3 = -------------------------------------------
      Trust 4 = ----------------------------------------------------
      Year 1 = ------
      Company = -------------------
      Accounting Firm = -------------------------

Dear -------------------:

    This responds to the letter dated March 10, 2010, and subsequent

correspondence submitted by your authorized representative, requesting an extension
of time under § 2642(g) of the Internal Revenue Code and § 301.9100-3 of the
Procedure and Administration Regulations to make an allocation of generation-skipping
transfer (GST) exemption with respect to transfers to Trusts 1, 2, 3, and 4.

     The facts and representations submitted are summarized as follows: On Date 1,

prior to December 31, 2000, Donor created Trust, an irrevocable trust, and funded Trust
with shares of stock in Company. Under the terms of Trust, the trustee was directed to
divide the trust corpus into four separate trusts, one trust for the benefit of each of
Donor’s children and their descendants. Pursuant to this directive, the trustee

PLR-111635-10 2

established Trust 1 for the benefit of Child 1 and his descendants, Trust 2 for the benefit
of Child 2 and his descendants, Trust 3 for the benefit of Child 3 and his descendants,
and Trust 4 for the benefit of Child 4 and her descendants.

  Donor filed a Year 1 Form 709, United States Gift (and Generation-Skipping

Transfer) Tax Return. In preparing the Form 709, Accounting Firm failed to allocate
Donor's available GST exemption to the Year 1 transfers to Trusts 1, 2, 3, and 4.

    It is represented that to date, no taxable distributions, taxable terminations, or

any other GST taxable events have occurred with respect to any of the trusts that would
result in a GST tax liability on the part of any of the trusts or their beneficiaries. Donor
has sufficient GST exemption remaining and available to allocate GST exemption with
respect to the Year 1 transfers to Trusts 1, 2, 3, and 4.

    Section 2601 imposes a tax on every generation-skipping transfer (GST) made

by a “transferor” to a “skip person.” A “generation-skipping transfer” is defined under
§ 2611(a) as: (1) a taxable distribution; (2) a taxable termination; and (3) a direct skip.

   Section 2602 provides that the amount of the GST tax is determined by

multiplying the taxable amount by the applicable rate. Section 2641(a) provides that the
term “applicable rate” means with respect to any GST, the product of the maximum
federal estate tax rate and the inclusion ratio with respect to the transfer.

    Under § 2642(a)(1), the inclusion ratio with respect to any property transferred in

a generation-skipping transfer is generally defined as the excess of 1 over the
“applicable fraction.” The applicable fraction, as defined in § 2642(a)(2), is a fraction,
the numerator of which is the amount of GST exemption under § 2631 allocated to the
trust (or to property transferred in a direct skip), and the denominator of which is the
value of the property transferred to the trust or involved in the direct skip.

   Section 2631(a), as in effect for the tax year at issue, provided that, for purposes

of determining the inclusion ratio, every individual shall be allowed a GST exemption of
$1,000,000 which may be allocated by such individual (or his executor) to any property
with respect to which such individual is the transferor. Section 2631(b) provides that
any allocation under § 2631(a), once made, shall be irrevocable.

     Section 2632(a) provides that any allocation by an individual of his or her GST

exemption under § 2631(a) may be made at any time on or before the date prescribed
for filing the estate tax return for such individual's estate (determined with regard to
extensions), regardless of whether such a return is required to be filed. Section
26.2632-1(b)(4) of the Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Regulations provides that an
allocation of GST exemption to property transferred during the transferor's lifetime is
made on Form 709.

PLR-111635-10 3

   Section 2642(b)(1) provides that, except as provided in § 2642(f), if the allocation

of the GST exemption to any transfers of property is made on a gift tax return filed on
or before the date prescribed by § 6075(b) for such transfer the value of such property
for purposes of determining the inclusion ratio under § 2642(a) shall be its value as
finally determined for purposes of chapter 12 (within the meaning of § 2001(f)(2)).

   Section 2642(g)(1)(A) provides that the Secretary shall by regulation prescribe

such circumstances and procedures under which extensions of time will be granted to
make an allocation of GST exemption described in § 2642(b)(1) or (2), and an election
under § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5). Such regulations shall include procedures for requesting
comparable relief with respect to transfers made before the date of the enactment of
this paragraph.

   Section 2642(g)(1)(B) provides that in determining whether to grant relief under

§ 2642(g)(1), the Secretary shall take into account all relevant circumstances, including
evidence of intent contained in the trust instrument or instrument of transfer and such
other factors as the Secretary deems relevant. For purposes of determining whether to
grant relief, the time for making the allocation (or election) shall be treated as if not
expressly prescribed by statute.

    Notice 2001-50, 2001-2 C.B. 189, provides that under § 2642(g)(1)(B), the time

for allocating the GST exemption to lifetime transfers and transfers at death, the time
for electing out of the automatic allocation rules, and the time for electing to treat any
trust as a generation-skipping trust are to be treated as if not expressly prescribed by
statute. The Notice further provides that taxpayers may seek an extension of time to
make an allocation described in § 2642(b)(1) or (b)(2) or an election described in §
2632(b)(3) or (c)(5) under the provisions of § 301.9100-3.

    Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a

reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3
to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than 6 months except
in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue
Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

   Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards used to determine whether to grant

an extension of time to make an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation
(and not expressly provided by statute). In accordance with § 2642(g)(1)(B) and Notice
2001-50, taxpayers may seek an extension of time to make an allocation described in §
2642(b)(1) or (b)(2) or an election described in § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5) under the
provisions of § 301.9100-3.

PLR-111635-10 4

   Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer

provides the evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the
taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice
the interests of the government.

   Under § 301.9100-3(b)(iv), a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably and

in good faith if the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, including a
tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax professional failed to make, or
advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

    Based on the facts submitted and representations made, we conclude that the

requirements of § 301.9100-3 are satisfied. Therefore, Donor is granted an extension of
time of 60 days from the date of this letter to make allocations of Donor's available GST
exemption with respect to the Year 1 transfers to Trusts 1, 2, 3, and 4. The allocations
will be effective as of the date of the transfers to the trusts, and the gift tax values of the
transfers to the trusts will be used in determining the inclusion ratio with respect to each
trust.

  The allocations should be made on Supplemental Forms 709 for the appropriate

calendar year and filed with the Internal Revenue Service, Cincinnati Service Center—
Stop 82, Cincinnati, Ohio 45999. A copy of this letter should be attached to each
Supplemental Form 709.

  The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and

representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury
statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the
material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on
examination.

   Except as specifically ruled herein, we express no opinion on the federal tax

consequences of the transaction under the cited provisions or under any other
provisions of the Code. Specifically we are not ruling on whether Trusts 1, 2, 3, and 4
will have zero inclusion ratios as a result of Donor’s allocations of GST exemption to the
Year 1 transfers to the trusts. The rulings in this letter pertaining to the federal estate
and/or generation-skipping transfer tax apply only to the extent that the relevant
sections of the Internal Revenue Code are in effect during the period at issue.

PLR-111635-10 5

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)

provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

   In accordance with a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter

is being sent to your authorized representative.

                                          Sincerely,


                                          Associate Chief Counsel
                                          (Passthroughs and Special Industries)



                                   By:   ____________________________
                                         Lorraine E. Gardner
                                         Senior Counsel, Branch 4
                                         Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                         (Passthroughs and Special Industries)

Enclosures
Copy for section 6110 purposes
Copy of this letter

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.