PLR 1035004: IRS said a city department generally need not report school transportation reimbursements
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The IRS considered a city department that planned to pay parents a per diem to transport eligible special-needs children to and from school. The payments were intended to reimburse transportation expenses, but parents would not be required to substantiate their actual costs. The IRS concluded that the reimbursements generally were not gross income except to the extent they exceeded actual expenses, and the department ordinarily would not have to file information returns because it could not determine the includable amount. The department would have to report payments if it knew that the excess over actual expenses was $600 or more.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Must the department file information returns for per diem transportation payments to parents?
- Outcome: Approved
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 61, 6041, and 6110; Treas. Reg. § 1.6041-1
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201035004 [Third Party Communication:
Release Date: 9/3/2010 Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]
Index Number: 61.00-00, 6041.00-00
Person To Contact:
----------------------- -----------------, ID No. ------------
--------------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
--------------------------- --------------------
--------------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:ITA:B04
PLR-104546-10
Date:
May 26, 2010
TY:
Legend
City = -------------
State = -------------
Department = ---------------------------------------------
Office = ---------------------------------------
Program = ------------------------
Dear: -----------------
This is in response to your request for a private letter ruling that the Department is not
required to file information returns under § 6041 of the Internal Revenue Code for the
payments that the Department will make to parents of pre-school special needs children
to reimburse the expenses of transporting students to and from school.
FACTS
The Department is obligated to provide transportation services to eligible City students.
The Office, an entity within the Department, is charged with ensuring that all eligible City
students receive safe, clean, and timely transportation to and from school. The Office
coordinates transportation services to and from school for eligible general education
and special education students in both public and private schools. Currently, these
services include stop-to-stop busing, door-to-door busing, and public transportation.
The Department is developing programs to reduce its transportation costs and provide
better transportation services. A pilot Program for special education students will
provide the option to parents to either continue with the service provided by the Office or
to provide their own transportation. Under the Program, the Department will pay the
parents a per diem rate for transporting eligible children whether by public
transportation, private vehicle, licensed taxi, or car service.
PLR-104546-10 2
Parents electing to enroll in the Program will be required to sign a form acknowledging
that: (1) they will be responsible for providing transportation to and from school; (2)
payments made under the Program are intended to cover only actual transportation
expenses and for no other purpose; (3) payments in excess of actual expenses may
result in federal, state, and local tax liability and affect benefits conditioned on income;
and (4) they will be required to return payments that were based on the submission of
false information.
Participating parents will be required to submit weekly payment requests to the Office
certifying the number of days that they transported their children to and from school
during the preceding week. Parents will not be required to substantiate actual
transportation expenses.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 61(a) of the Code provides that gross income includes “all income from
whatever source derived.” Accordingly, a taxpayer must include in gross income any
accession to wealth unless the taxpayer can point to another section that excludes the
accession from gross income. Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co., 348 U.S. 426
(1955).
The Supreme Court has long held that a taxpayer realizes income when he is
reimbursed for personal expenses. See Old Colony Trust Co. v. Commissioner,
279 U.S. 716 (1929); Commissioner v. Jacobson, 336 U.S. 28 (1949). Thus, the
amount a parent will receive as reimbursements for expenses may constitute an item of
gross income. However, in several revenue rulings, the Service has held that
reimbursements for expenses incurred by a taxpayer on behalf of another outside of the
employment context are not includable in the taxpayer’s gross income.
In Rev. Rul. 57-60, 1957-1 C.B. 25, as modified by Rev. Rul. 60-280, 1960-2 C.B. 12,
the Service concluded that a parent is not required to include in gross income
reimbursements from a state for transporting his or her child to school where bus
service is not available. The Service reasoned that the reimbursement was for an
expense incurred on behalf of the school board that was obligated to furnish
transportation to the school children.
In Rev. Rul. 67-30, 1967-1 C.B. 9, the Service addressed the tax consequences of per
diem allowance paid to a taxpayer to cover reasonable travel expenses, including meals
and lodging, while away from home performing gratuitous services for an exempt
organization. The Service held that the taxpayer providing gratuitous services to a
section 170(c) organization must include in gross income only reimbursed expenses in
excess of actual travel expenses. See also Rev. Rul. 80-99, 1980-1 C.B. 10.
PLR-104546-10 3
Section 6041(a) of the Code requires all persons engaged in a trade or business and
making payments in the course of such trade or business to another person of rents,
salaries, wages, premiums, annuities, compensations, remunerations, emoluments, or
other fixed or determinable gains, profits, and income of $600 or more in any taxable
year to file an information return with the Service setting forth the amount of such gains.
profits, and income, and the name and address of the recipient of the payment.
Section 1.6041-1(b) of the Income Tax Regulations (regulations) defines the terms
“persons engaged in a trade or business” to include organizations the activities of which
are not for profit or gain.
Section 1.6041-1(c) of the regulations provides that income is fixed when it is paid in
amounts definitely predetermined. Income is determinable whenever there is a basis of
calculation by which the amount to be paid may be ascertained.
CONCLUSION
In the instant case, the Department is obligated to provide transportation services to
eligible City students. The payments are made to parents to reimburse the parents for
expenses that they incur on behalf of the Department. Accordingly, reimbursements
received by parents under the Program are not includable in the parents’ gross income,
except to the extent that the reimbursements exceed the parents’ actual transportation
expenses.
Further, the Department will not know the parents’ actual transportation expenses.
Because the Department will not know how much of the reimbursements will be
excludable from the parents’ gross income, the amount, if any, includable in the parents’
gross income is not fixed and determinable. Unless the Department has knowledge of
payments that are includable in the parents’ gross income, § 6041(a) does not require
the Department to issue information returns. Accordingly, we conclude that the
Department is not required to file information returns reporting payments to parents as
reimbursements for the transportation expenses, unless the Department has knowledge
that the amounts that are paid exceed the parents’ actual expenses by $600 or more.
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative.
PLR-104546-10 4
The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.
Sincerely,
Donna Welsh
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 4
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Income Tax & Accounting)
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.