CCA 1034019: A federal tax lien attaches to a joint possession right in a matrimonial residence
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel Advice considered whether a right of joint possession in a principal matrimonial residence was property or a right to property subject to a federal tax lien. It concluded that the right under N.J.S.A. § 3B:28-3 was property or a right to property to which a lien attaches under IRC § 6321. The advice found the facts of In re Rosa, 261 B.R. 136 (D.N.J. 2001), instructive.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Does a right of joint possession in a principal matrimonial residence qualify as property or a right to property subject to a federal tax lien?
- Outcome: Advice given
- Key authorities: IRC § 6321; N.J.S.A. § 3B:28-3; In re Rosa, 261 B.R. 136 (D.N.J. 2001)
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2010072616072938 Number: 201034019
Release Date: 8/27/2010
Office:
UILC: 6321.00-00
From: ----------------------
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 4:07:31 PM
To: ------------------------
Cc: ------------------
Subject: RE: Request for Advice -- ( ------------------------) Federal Tax Lien (“FTL”) pursuant to 26
U.S.C. § 6321
The right of joint possession of property occupied as a principal matrimonial residence under N.J.S.A. §
3B:28-3 is property or a right to property to which a federal tax lien attaches under I.R.C. section 6321.
We find the facts of In re Rosa, 261 B.R. 136 (D.N.J. 2001), to be instructive. -------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have additional questions.
Sincerely,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.