Private Letter Ruling 1034003 Released August 27, 2010 Approved

PLR 1034003: IRS grants relief after a trust’s missed ESBT election terminated an S election

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS considered a corporation whose S corporation election terminated after a trust holding its stock ceased to qualify as a qualified subchapter S trust (QSST) and no election was filed to treat the trust as an electing small business trust (ESBT). The corporation represented that the failure was inadvertent and that it and its shareholders had reported income consistently with S corporation treatment. The IRS concluded that the termination was inadvertent and treated the corporation as continuing to be an S corporation from the termination date under § 1362(f). The relief required a payment, an ESBT election effective on the termination date, and any necessary adjustments, including amended returns for open years. The IRS expressed no opinion on the corporation’s eligibility as an S corporation or the trust’s eligibility as an ESBT.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May a corporation’s S election continue after its shareholder trust misses an ESBT election and becomes ineligible?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361 and 1362; Treas. Reg. § 1.1362-4

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201034003 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 8/27/2010 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
Index Number: 1362.04-00 -----------------, ID No. -------------
Telephone Number:
---------------------
------------------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
------------------------------ CC:PSI:1
-------------------------------------- PLR-101791-10
--------------------------------- Date:
May 10, 2010

                                                   Legend

X = ------------------------------


Trust = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------


State = ------------------

A = -----------------------

d1 = -------------------------

d2 = ----------------------

d3 = -----------------------

d4 = -------------------

n = -------

p = --

$w = ---------------

Year = -------

Dear ----------------:
PLR-101791-10 2

   This letter responds to your letter dated January 12, 2010, submitted on behalf of

X, requesting a ruling under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code.

                                      Facts

   X was incorporated under the laws of State on d1. X elected to be an S

corporation effective d2. At that time, Trust owned n shares of X. A was the sole
income beneficiary of Trust until A’s death on d3. Prior to A’s death, Trust was a
Qualified Subchapter S Trust (QSST) within the meaning of § 1361(d).

  Upon A’s death, Trust’s beneficiaries were A’s p living children. Because Trust

had more than one income beneficiary after B’s death, Trust no longer qualified as a
QSST. X represents that Trust was qualified to be an Electing Small Business Trust
(ESBT), within the meaning of § 1361(e). However, no election was made under
§ 1361(e)(3) to treat Trust as an ESBT. Consequently, Trust became an ineligible
shareholder and X’s S corporation election terminated on d3.

   X represents that there was no intent to terminate X’s S corporation election and

that the failure to timely file the ESBT election for Trust was inadvertent. X and X’s
shareholders agree to make any adjustments consistent with the treatment of X as an S
corporation as may be required by the Secretary with respect to the period specified by
§ 1362(f).

                                Law and Analysis

    Section 1361(a)(1) provides that the term “S corporation” means, with respect to

any taxable year, a small business corporation for which an election under § 1362(a) is
in effect for such year.

   Section 1361(b)(1) defines a “small business corporation” as a domestic

corporation which is not an ineligible shareholder and which does not (A) have more
than 100 shareholders, (B) have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate, a
trust described in § 1361(c)(2), or an organization described in § 1361(c)(6)) who is not
an individual, (C) have a nonresident alien as a shareholder, and (D) have more than 1
class of stock.

   Section 1361(c)(2)(A)(v) provides that for purposes of § 1361(b)(1)(B), an ESBT

is a permissible shareholder.

   Section 1361(e)(1)(A) provides that, except as provided in § 1361(e)(1)(B), the

term “electing small business trust” means any trust if (i) such trust does not have as a
beneficiary any person other than (I) an individual, (II) an estate, (III) an organization
described in § 170(c)(2)-(5), or (IV) an organization described in § 170(c)(1) which holds
a contingent interest in such trust and is not a potential current beneficiary, (ii) no
PLR-101791-10 3

interest in such trust was acquired by purchase, and (iii) an election under § 1361(e)
applies to such trust.

   Section 1361(e)(3) provides that an election under § 1361(e) shall be made by

the trustee. Any such election shall apply to the taxable year of the trust for which made
and all subsequent taxable years of such trust unless revoked with the consent of the
Secretary.

   Section 1362(d)(2)(A) provides that an election under § 1362(a) shall be

terminated whenever (at any time on or after the 1st day of the 1st taxable year for which
the corporation is an S corporation) such corporation ceases to be a small business
corporation.

    Section 1362(f) provides, in relevant part, that if (1) an election under § 1362(a)

by any corporation was terminated under § 1362(d)(2) or (3); (2) the Secretary
determines that the circumstances resulting in such termination were inadvertent; (3) no
later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in
such termination, steps were taken so that the corporation for which the termination
occurred is a small business corporation; and (4) the corporation for which the
termination occurred, and each person who was a shareholder of the corporation at any
time during the period specified pursuant to § 1362(f), agrees to make the adjustments
(consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation) as may be
required by the Secretary with respect to this period, then, notwithstanding the
circumstances resulting in the termination, the corporation shall be treated as an S
corporation during the period specified by the Secretary.

   Section 1.1362-4(d) provides that the Commissioner may require any

adjustments that are appropriate. In general, the adjustments required should be
consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation during the period
specified by the Commissioner.

                                   Conclusion

   Based solely on the facts submitted and representations made, we conclude that

X’s S corporation election was terminated on d3 when Trust ceased to qualify as a
QSST and Trust failed to timely file an ESBT election under § 1361(e)(3). We further
conclude that the termination was inadvertent within the meaning of § 1362(f). Pursuant
to the provisions of § 1362(f), X will be treated as continuing to be an S corporation on
and after d3, unless X’s S corporation election was otherwise terminated under
§ 1362(d) and provided that the following conditions are met.

  As an adjustment under § 1362(f)(4), a payment of $w and a copy of this letter

must be sent to the following address: Internal Revenue Service, Cincinnati Service
Center, 201 West Rivercenter Blvd.; Covington, KY 41011; Stop 31; Terri Lackey;
Manual Deposit. This payment must be sent no later than d4. In addition, the trustee of
PLR-101791-10 4

Trust must file an ESBT election effective d3 with the appropriate service center within
60 days of the date of this letter. A copy of this letter should be attached to the ESBT
election. Finally, the trustee of Trust must make appropriate adjustments including filing
amended tax returns, if any are required, for open tax years including Year to bring
Trust in compliance with the ESBT requirements.

     Except for the specific ruling above, no opinion is expressed or implied

concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts of this case under any other
provision of the Code. Specifically, no opinion is expressed or implied regarding X’s
eligibility to be an S corporation or Trust’s eligibility to be an ESBT.

  The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and

representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalties of perjury
statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the
material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on
examination.

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. According to

§ 6110(k)(3), this ruling may not be used or cited as precedent.

    Under a power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a copy of this

letter to your authorized representative.

                                   Sincerely,

                                   David R. Haglund
                                   David R. Haglund
                                   Chief, Branch 1
                                   Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                   (Passthroughs & Special Industries)

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.