PLR 1033032: Extension granted to make section 59(e) elections
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The IRS granted a taxpayer more time to make section 59(e) elections for two redacted taxable years. The taxpayer had not made the elections on time and submitted representations explaining the delay. The IRS determined that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith and that the extension would not prejudice the government. The taxpayer could make the elections within 60 days after the ruling date, but the IRS expressed no opinion on whether the underlying expenditures were qualified expenditures under section 59(e)(2).
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could the taxpayer receive extra time to make section 59(e) elections for two taxable years?
- Outcome: approved
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 59(e) and 6110; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.59-1 and 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201033032 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 8/20/2010 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 59.00-00, 9100.00-00
Person To Contact:
---------------------------- -----------------------, ID No. -------------------
----------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------
----------------------------- Telephone Number:
-------------------------------- ---------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B06
PLR-149670-09
PLR-149671-09
Date: May 4, 2010
May 04, 2010
LEGEND:
Taxpayer: ----------------------------------------------
a: -------
b: -------
Dear ----:
We received a letter from your authorized representative, requesting an
extension of time under § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations
to file an election under § 59(e) of the Internal Revenue Code for the a and b taxable
years. This letter responds to that request.
According to the information submitted, Taxpayer did not timely make the
election under § 59(e) for the a and b taxable years. Taxpayer has made
representations explaining why the election under § 59(e) was not timely filed.
Section 59(e) provides an optional ten year write-off of certain tax preferences.
Section 59(e)(4) provides that an election may be made under § 59(e)(1) with respect to
any portion of any qualified expenditure.
Section 1.59-1(b)(1) provides that an election under § 59(e) can only be made by
attaching a statement to the taxpayer’s income tax return (or amended return) for the
taxable year in which the amortization of the qualified expenditures subject to the
§ 59(e) election begins. The statement must be filed no later than the date prescribed
by law for filing the taxpayer’s original income tax return (including any extensions of
time) for the taxable year in which the amortization of the qualified expenditures subject
to the § 59(e) election begins.
Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner, in an exercise of
PLR-149670-09 2
discretion, may grant a reasonable extension of time under rules set forth in
§§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but
not more than 6 months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all
subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H and I.
Sections 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner
will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election under
§ 301.9100-1(a).
Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer
provides the evidence to establish that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith,
and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.
Based on the facts and representations submitted with your request, we have
determined that the requirements of § 301.9100-3 have been satisfied with respect to
the a and b taxable years. Therefore, an extension of time is granted, until 60 days from
the date of this ruling, for making an election under § 59(e) for the a and b taxable years.
Except as expressly provided herein, we express or imply no opinion concerning
the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced
in this letter. Specifically, we express or imply no opinion concerning whether the
expenditures are qualified expenditures under § 59(e)(2).
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and
representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury
statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the
material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on
examination.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, we are sending a
copy of this letter to your authorized representative. A copy of this ruling must be
attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant. Alternatively, taxpayers filing
their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by attaching a statement to their
return that provides the date and control number of the letter ruling.
PLR-149670-09 3
Sincerely,
Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
By:
Charles B. Ramsey, Chief
Branch 6
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.