Private Letter Ruling 1033024 Released August 20, 2010 Approved

PLR 1033024: IRS granted extra time to elect partnership classification

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS granted a foreign eligible entity an additional 60 days to file Form 8832 and elect to be treated as a partnership for federal tax purposes. The company intended the election to be effective on a specified date but failed to file the form because of inadvertence. The IRS concluded that the company acted reasonably and in good faith and that granting relief would not prejudice the government's interests. The extension did not determine whether the company was otherwise eligible to make the election.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the company receive an extension of time to file Form 8832 and elect partnership classification?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 301.7701-3 and 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201033024 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 8/20/2010 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.31-00
Person To Contact:
--------------- --------------------, ID No. -------------
------------------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------------------ ---------------------
---------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
--------------------------------------- CC:PSI:3
----------------------------------- PLR-151780-09
Date:
May 11, 2010

                                                LEGEND

Company = -----------------

Country = ------------

Date = ------------------

Dear ------------------:

  This letter responds to a letter dated November 6, 2009, and subsequent

correspondence, submitted on behalf of Company requesting an extension of time
under § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to file an election
under § 301.7701-3(c) to be treated as a partnership for federal tax purposes.

                                                 FACTS

     Company was formed under the laws of Country on Date. Company represents

that it is a foreign entity eligible to elect to be treated as a partnership for federal tax
purposes. Company intended to be treated as a partnership effective Date. However,
due to inadvertence, Company failed to file Form 8832, Entity Classification Election,
electing to treat Company as a partnership effective Date.

                                       LAW AND ANALYSIS

    Section 301.7701-3(a) provides, in part, that a business entity that is not

classified as a corporation under § 301.7701-2(b)(1), (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), or (8) (an
eligible entity) can elect its classification for federal tax purposes as provided in
§ 301.7701-3. An eligible entity with at least two members can elect to be classified as
either an association (and thus a corporation under § 301.7701-2(b)(2)) or a
partnership, and an eligible entity with a single owner can elect to be classified as an
association or to be disregarded as an entity separate from its owner.

    Section 301.7701-3(b)(2)(i) provides that, except as provided in § 301.7701-

3(b)(3), unless the entity elects otherwise, a foreign eligible entity is: (A) a partnership if
it has two or more members and at least one member does not have limited liability;
(B) an association if all members have limited liability; or (C) disregarded as an entity
separate from its owner if it has a single owner that does not have limited liability.

   Section 301.7701-3(b)(2)(ii) provides, in part, that for purposes of § 301.7701-

3(b)(2)(i), a member of a foreign eligible entity has limited liability if the member has no
personal liability for the debts of or claims against the entity by reason of being a
member.

   Section 301.7701-3(c)(1)(i) provides, in part, that, except as provided in

§ 301.7701-3(c)(1)(iv) and (v), an eligible entity may elect to be classified other than as
provided under § 301.7701-3(b), or to change its classification, by filing Form 8832 with
the service center designated on Form 8832.

     Section 301.7701-3(c)(1)(iii) provides, in part, that an election made under

§ 301.7701-3(c)(1)(i) will be effective on the date specified by the entity on Form 8832
or on the date filed if no such date is specified on the election form. The effective date
specified on Form 8832 can not be more than 75 days prior to the date on which the
election is filed and can not be more than 12 months after the date on which the
election is filed.

   Under § 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner may grant a reasonable extension of

time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months
except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal
Revenue Code (Code) except subtitles E, G, H, and I. Section 301.9100-1(b) provides
that the term “regulatory election” includes an election whose due date is prescribed by
a regulation published in the Federal Register.

   Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the

Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an
election. Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain
elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making elections that do
not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.

  Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be

granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in
§ 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer
acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests
of the Government.

                                  CONCLUSION

    Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude

that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied.
Consequently, Company is granted an extension of time of 60 days from the date of this
letter to file a Form 8832 with the appropriate service center to elect to be treated as a
partnership effective Date. A copy of this letter should be attached to the Form 8832.

   Except for the specific ruling above, we express or imply no opinion concerning

the federal tax consequences of the facts of this case under any other provision of the
Code. In addition, § 301.9100-1(a) provides that the granting of an extension of time for
making an election is not a determination that the taxpayer is otherwise eligible to make
the election.

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. According to

§ 6110(k)(3) of the Code, this ruling may not be used or cited as precedent.

    Under a power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a copy of this

letter to Company’s authorized representative.

                               Sincerely,


                               Associate Chief Counsel
                               (Passthroughs & Special Industries)


                                        /s/
                          By: _______________________________________
                              Mary Beth Carchia, Senior Technician Reviewer
                              Branch 3
                              Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                              (Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)
A copy of this letter
A copy for § 6110 purposes

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.