Private Letter Ruling 1033023 Released August 20, 2010 Denied

PLR 1033023: IRS denied late-election relief for an estate's alternate valuation election

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS denied an estate's request for additional time to make an alternate valuation election under IRC § 2032. The estate's representatives filed the estate tax return on time, but the preparer did not consider the election and the error was discovered more than 18 months after the return's due date. The law barred the election because it was not made within one year after the due date, including extensions. The IRS therefore could not grant relief under the extension provisions.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the estate receive extra time to make an alternate valuation election under IRC § 2032?
  • Outcome: Denied
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 2032 and 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3; Treas. Reg. § 20.2032-1

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201033023
Release Date: 8/20/2010
Index Number: 2032.00-00; 9100.00-00 Person To Contact:
-------------------, ID No. -------------
Telephone Number:
---------------------
------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
------------------------------------- CC:PSI:B04 – PLR-151976-09
------------------------- Date: MAY 19, 2010



Re: --------------------------------------------------------

Legend
Decedent = ------------------------------------------------
Personal Representatives = ----------------------------------------
CPA = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date 1 = -------------------------
Date 2 = --------------------------
Date 3 = -------------------------

Dear --------------:

    This responds to a letter from your authorized representative, dated September

21, 2009, requesting an extension of time under § 301.9100 of the Procedure and
Administration Regulations to make an alternate valuation election under § 2032 of the
Internal Revenue Code.

    The facts and representations submitted are summarized as follows: Decedent

died on Date 1, and the Personal Representatives of Decedent’s estate timely filed
Form 706, United States Estate (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return on Date

  1. The Personal Representatives hired CPA to prepare Form 706. The CPA prepared
    the Form 706 without considering the alternate valuation election under § 2032. The
    error was discovered on Date 3, more than 18 months after the due date (including
    extensions) of the Form 706.

    Section 2032(a) provides, in part, that the value of the gross estate may be
    

    determined, if the executor so elects, by valuing all the property included in the gross
    estate as follows:

      (1) In the case of property distributed, sold, exchanged, or otherwise
      disposed of, within 6 months after the decedent’s death such property
      shall be valued as of the date of distribution, sale, exchange, or other
      disposition.
    

    (2) In the case of property not distributed, sold, exchanged, or otherwise
    disposed of, within 6 months after the decedent’s death such property
    shall be valued as of the date 6 months after the decedent’s death.

    Section 2032(c) provides that no election may be made under § 2032 with
    respect to an estate unless such election will decrease (1) the value of the gross estate
    and (2) the sum of the tax imposed by chapter 11 and the tax imposed by chapter 13
    with respect to property includible in the decedent’s gross estate (reduced by credits
    allowable against such taxes).

    Section 2032(d)(1) provides that an election under § 2032 shall be made by the
    executor on the return of tax imposed by chapter 11. Under § 2032(d)(2), no election
    may be made under § 2032 if such return is filed more than 1 year after the time
    prescribed by law (including extensions) for filing such return.

    Section 20.2032-1(b)(3) of the Estate Tax Regulations provides that a request for
    

    an extension of time to make the § 2032 election pursuant to §§ 301.9100-1 and
    301.9100-3 will not be granted unless the estate tax return is filed no later than 1 year
    after the due date of the return (including extensions to time actually granted).

    Under § 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner may grant a reasonable extension of
    

    time to make a regulatory election, or statutory election (but no more than 6 months
    except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal
    Revenue Code except Subtitles E, G, H, and I, if the taxpayer demonstrates to the
    satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer has acted reasonably and in good
    faith, and granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

    Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the
    Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an
    election. Section 301.9100-1(a).

    Section 301.9100-2 provides an automatic extension of time for making certain
    elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making elections that do
    not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.

    Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer
    provides the evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the
    taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice
    the interests of the government.

    Section 301.9100-3(b)(1)(v) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted
    reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax
    professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax
    professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

    Based on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that
    

    the estate does not satisfy the requirements of § 2032(d)(2) because the election was
    not filed within 1 year of the due date of the return. Accordingly, we cannot grant an
    extension of time to make the alternate valuation election under § 2032.

    Except as specifically ruled herein, we express or imply no opinion on the federal
    tax consequences of the transaction under the cited provisions or under any other
    provisions of the Code.

    The ruling in this letter pertaining to the federal estate and/or generation-skipping
    transfer tax apply only to the extent that the relevant sections of the Internal Revenue
    Code are in effect during the period at issue.

    This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)
    provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

    Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
    being sent to your authorized representative.

                                       Sincerely,
    
                                       Associate Chief Counsel
                                       (Passthroughs & Special Industries)
    
                                  By: _________________
                                      Lorraine Gardner
                                      Senior Counsel, Branch 4
                                      Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                      (Passthroughs & Special Industries)
    

Enclosures
Copy for section 6110 purposes
Copy of this letter

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.