CCA 201032041: An unrestricted consent extended the assessment period for affected partnership items
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel Advice addresses whether an extension of the assessment period was valid when gain from the sale of a partnership interest was an affected item. The advice concludes that the consent was unrestricted and therefore valid, and that an extension under section 6229 also extended the period for assessing affected items.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Did an unrestricted consent validly extend the assessment period for affected items related to a partnership interest?
- Outcome: Advice given
- Key authorities: IRC § 6229.
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2010070608245937 Number: 201032041
Release Date: 8/13/2010
Office: ----------
UILC: 6229.02-00
From: -------------------
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 8:25:05 AM
To: --------------------------------
Cc:
Subject: RE: Local Counsel Questioning SOL
My last e-mail concluded that the statute extension was valid when I said that gain on the sale of a partnership interest was an affected item and that: "Under section 6229, any extension of the period for assessing tax attributable to partnership items also extends the period for assessing affected items. See, e.g., Ginsburg v. Commissioner. "
Since the consent was unrestricted it was fine.
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace