CCA 201032039: Partnership items are subject to partner-level assessment periods, not a separate partnership statute

Number
201032039
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Partnership Items
Code sections
§ 6221, § 6229, § 6501, § 705
Ruling dated
July 2, 2010
Publicly released
August 13, 2010

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel Advice explains that there is no separate partnership statute of limitations for the issue under review. Section 6229(a) provides a minimum period during which a partner's section 6501 assessment period will not expire for partnership items, and the tax matters partner or individual partners can extend the applicable periods using the identified consent forms. The advice also states that partnership items used to compute a partner's basis in an affected-item proceeding bind both the partner and the government under section 705.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: How do assessment-period extensions and partnership items affect an affected-item proceeding involving a partner's basis?
  • Outcome: Advice given
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 6221, 6229(a), 6501, and 705.

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2010070209114337 Number: 201032039
Release Date: 8/13/2010
Office: ----------
UILC: 6221.00-00

From: -------------------
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 9:11:46 AM
To: -----------------
Cc: -----------------------------------
Subject: RE: ------ - At Risk Basis Adjustment for a Partner in a TEFRA Partnership

There is no partnership statute of limitations. Section 6229(a) merely provides a minimum period during which no partner's section 6501 period will expire with respect to partnership items. The TMP can extend every partner's section 6501 period for assessing partnership items using a Form 872-P, or the partners can extend the statute for themselves using the old Form 872-i or the new Form 872.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the affected item proceeding, both the partner and the government will be bound by those partnership items under section 705 that the partner must use in computing his basis as reflected on the partnership return, books and records. See Roberts v. Commissioner, 94 T.C. 853, 860 (1990)(bound by partnership books and records in affected item proceeding for at risk when no prior partnership proceeding) ; Gustin v. Commissioner T.C. memo (basis limitation affected item stat notice may be issued without prior partnership proceeding) and University Heights v. Commissioner, 97 T.C. 278 (1991)(listing partnership items that go into computation of partner's outside basis).

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace