Ezel / IRS Rulings / 201032037

CCA 201032037: A Dutch BV generally defaults to corporate classification because its members have limited liability

Number
201032037
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Partnerships v. Associations
Topics
Entity classification
Code sections
§ 7701
Ruling dated
March 25, 2010
Publicly released
August 13, 2010
Source
View Official PDF

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel Advice considers the U.S. tax classification of a French SA and a Dutch BV. It states that a French SA is a per se corporation and discusses the Dutch BV as an entity whose members generally have limited liability. The advice suggests that the BV defaults to corporate status unless it makes an election to be classified otherwise, and asks for confirmation of that understanding.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Does a Dutch BV default to corporate classification because its members have limited liability?
  • Outcome: Advice given
  • Key authorities: IRC § 7701.

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA-325122-10 Number: 201032037
Release Date: 8/13/2010
Office: ----------
UILC: 7701.02-00

_________
From: ------------------
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 12:24 PM
To: --------------------
Cc: --------------------------------------------------
Subject: RE: Characterization of Foreign Entities ----------

---------
A French SA is a per se Corporation.
A Dutch BV is described below.
A "BV" is a private company with limited liability; in Dutch: "Besloten Vennootschap met beperkte aansprakelijkheid". In comparison to other jurisdictions the BV can be seen as the equivalent of the German "GmbH", the American "LLC", or the English "Ltd". The shareholders of a BV are in general not personally liable for acts performed in the name or on behalf of the B.V., nor can they be compelled to make more funds available than that part of the capital for which they have subscribed.

As a result, my understanding is that a BV is an eligible entity that defaults into corporate status (because of its members have limited liability) unless it elects otherwise.

---------do you agree?

-----

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace