Private Letter Ruling 1032032 Released August 13, 2010 Approved

PLR 1032032: The IRS approved a hold-constant method for measuring ownership changes under section 382

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS approved a taxpayer's method for measuring increases in the ownership percentage of 5-percent shareholders on testing dates under section 382. The method holds each share's relative value constant from its acquisition date, subject to adjustments for later issuances and redemptions. The IRS also ruled that a value-for-value recapitalization of one class of preferred stock into another could be disregarded, with the replacement stock treated as acquired when the exchanged stock was acquired. The approval was subject to consistent tax-return treatment and continued use of the method until the first testing date on which it causes an ownership change. The letter did not rule on the value of the preferred stock or warrants and included other stated caveats.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the taxpayer use a hold-constant method to determine ownership changes under IRC § 382?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC § 382, including §§ 382(k)(6) and 382(l)(3)(C); IRC § 1504(a)(4); IRC § 6110(k)(3); Treas. Reg. § 1.382-4(d).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201032032 [Third Party Communication:
Release Date: 8/13/2010 Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]
Person To Contact:
Index Number: 382.12-06 ---------------------, ID No. -----------------
Telephone Number:


                                                           Refer Reply To:

--------------------------- CC:CORP:01
---------------------------------------------------- PLR-154172-09
------------------------------ Date:
---------------------------------------- May 07, 2010

LEGEND:

Date 1 = -------------------

Date 1.5 = -----------------------

Date 1.9 = -----------------------

Date 2 = -------------------

Date 3 = -------------------------

Date 4 = -------------------------

Date 5 = -------------------------

Recent Date = -----------------------

Recent Date 2 = -----------------

Parent = -------------------------------
--------------------------------
-----------------------

Stock Market = ------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                          ------------------------------------------

Company 1 = -------------------------

PLR-154172-09 2

Company 2 = ----------------------------------------------

Identified Holders = ------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Excess Cash = -----------------------------------------------------------------------

                                         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         ------------------------------------------------------------

Bank = -------

A = ---------------

B% = ------

C% = ------

D% = ------

$E = -----------------

F = --------------

$G = --------

$GG = -----

GGG = ---------------

PLR-154172-09 3

H = --------------

J = -----------

$K = ------

$L = ---------------

$M = ------

$N = -------------

$O = -----------------

P = ----

Q = ----

Dear -----------------:

We respond to your letter dated December 14, 2009, and subsequent correspondence,
in which you requested rulings as to certain federal income tax consequences of the
transactions discussed below.

The rulings contained in this letter are based on facts and representations submitted by
the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an
appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the materials submitted in support
of the request for rulings. Verification of the information and other data may be required
as part of the audit process.

FACTS

Parent is the common parent of an affiliated group of corporations that file a
consolidated Federal income tax return on a 52/53 week fiscal year which ends on the
Saturday nearest to January 31st (the “Parent Group,” also referred to as the
“Taxpayer”). The Parent Group is a loss group within the meaning of §1.1502-91(c)(1).

Parent was formed Date 1 and has a single class common stock outstanding (the
“Common”). The Common trades publicly on the Stock Market. As of Recent Date,
Parent had approximately A shares of Common outstanding, which were owned
approximately B% by public shareholders, C% by Company 1, and D% by five Identified

PLR-154172-09 4

Holders. Parent has never declared or paid any dividends or made any distributions
with respect to its Common.

On Date 2, Parent issued all F shares of its Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred
Stock (“Preferred A”) to Company 2 for $E. The Preferred A was convertible into an
equal number of shares of Common, subject to anti-dilution adjustments, and was
subject to mandatory redemption on the tenth anniversary of its issuance or upon a
“change of control” at $G per share (i.e., for $E in the aggregate). On Date 2, Common
was trading for about $GG per share and GGG shares of Common were outstanding.
The Preferred A participated in dividends on the same basis as the Common and had a
liquidation preference over the Common.

On Date 3 (shortly before the date on which the Preferred A was to be mandatorily
redeemed for $E under its original terms), all of the Preferred A was redeemed (the
“Preferred Stock Exchange”) in exchange for—(i) H shares of Series B Redeemable
Preferred Stock (the “Preferred B”), (ii) warrants to purchase up to J shares of Common
Stock at $K per share (“Warrants”), and a cash payment of $L. On Date 3, Common
was trading for only about $M per share and the Warrants were valued at $N.

The Preferred B is redeemable at any time by Parent for the initial redemption amount
of approximately $O, plus accrued but unpaid dividends. The Preferred B accrues
cumulative dividends at a base annual rate of P percent, subject to adjustment. All
payments on the Preferred B will be applied first to any accrued but unpaid dividends,
and then to the redemption of Preferred B. Q percent of the Preferred B (including
accrued but unpaid dividends) is required to be redeemed on Date 4 and the remainder
on Date 5. In addition, the Preferred B includes a cash sweep mechanism that may
require accelerated redemption if Parent generates Excess Cash above agreed upon
thresholds. The Preferred B (including accrued but unpaid dividends) is also required to
be redeemed, at the option of the holders, upon a change in control. The Preferred B is
not convertible into Common or any other security, but initially is entitled to vote with the
Common on a one-for-one basis on general corporate matters other than the election of
directors. In addition, the holders of the Preferred B Stock have certain class voting
rights concerning the election of directors.

Parent has, on occasion, issued warrants to acquire Common to Company 1 in
exchange for licensing, distribution and marketing agreements. Parent also has
outstanding various non-statutory stock options and incentive stock options issued to
employees, none of which were issued at a per share exercise price less than the fair
market value of the Common on the date of grant.

As of Recent Date, Parent had no long term debt obligations outstanding. Parent has,
however, recently entered into an agreement with Bank to establish a senior secured
revolving credit facility. There were no borrowings against this credit facility as of the
date of Taxpayer’s initial letter.

PLR-154172-09 5

REPRESENTATIONS

Taxpayer makes the following representations:

  1. Parent Group has been a loss group within the meaning of §1.1502-91(c) of the
    Income Tax Regulations since its taxable year ended Date 1.9.

  2. There have been no classes of Parent stock outstanding that constituted “stock”
    within the meaning of section 382(k)(6) and §1.382-2(a)(3) at any time during the period
    beginning Date 1.5 and ending Recent Date 2, other than the Common, Preferred A,
    and Preferred B.

  3. Parent has treated and will continue to treat the Common, the Preferred A, and the
    Preferred B as equity for U.S. Federal income tax purposes.

  4. None of the Common, the Preferred A, or the Preferred B satisfies the requirements
    of section 1504(a)(4). Accordingly, each of the Common, the Preferred A, and the
    Preferred B constitutes stock for purposes of section 382.

  5. Other than the Preferred A issued on Date 2 and Preferred B issued on Date 3,
    Parent has not issued any additional shares of the Preferred A or the Preferred B, nor
    any rights to acquire the Preferred A or the Preferred B. Other than in the Preferred
    Stock Exchange, which occurred on Date 3, Parent did not redeem any of the Preferred
    A.

  6. Parent has never declared or paid any dividends or made any distributions with
    respect to its Common.

  7. Parent has treated, and will continue to treat, any Parent debt as debt for U.S.
    Federal income tax purposes.

  8. Parent has not issued, nor has any Parent Group member issued, any contingent
    purchase, warrant, convertible debt, put, stock subject to a risk of forfeiture, contract to
    acquire stock, or option with a principal purpose of avoiding or ameliorating the impact
    of an ownership change.

  9. To the best of the Taxpayer’s knowledge, the amount of tax liability on any of
    Taxpayer’s Federal income tax returns filed to date would not be affected by whether or
    not Taxpayer takes into account the effect of fluctuations in the relative values of
    different classes of stock for purposes of determining owner shifts and ownership
    changes under section 382.

RULINGS

PLR-154172-09 6

For purposes of the rulings below, the Hold Constant Principle is defined as follows:

   On any testing date, in determining the ownership percentage of any 5-percent
   shareholder, the value of each share of such shareholder's stock, relative to the
   value of all other shares of the Taxpayer’s stock, shall be considered to remain
   constant since the acquisition date of that share, except as properly adjusted to
   account for the dilutive effect of subsequent issuances or the accretive effect of
   subsequent redemptions of other shares of the Taxpayer’s stock. The issuance
   of a second class of stock generally establishes the acquisition date for the
   preexisting class as well as the second class. For stock acquired before the
   beginning of any given testing period, the Taxpayer may use as its acquisition
   date the date that begins the testing period in lieu of its actual acquisition date(s),
   provided it does so with respect to every testing period and with respect to each
   and every share of stock so acquired.

Based solely on the information submitted, we rule as follows:

  1. Taxpayer may apply a method employing the Hold Constant Principle (the “Method”)
    to determine the increase in percentage ownership of each of its 5-percent shareholders
    on each of its testing dates on or after Date 2 (and to identify which such testing dates
    are change dates) for purposes of section 382, provided that—(i) Taxpayer takes a
    return position consistent therewith on its tax return for its first taxable year in which the
    application of the Method would affect the amount of its tax liability, and (ii) if
    employment of the Method does not result in an ownership change during said first
    taxable year, Taxpayer continues to apply the Method thereafter through the testing
    date on which the Method first results in an ownership change. See section
    382(l)(3)(C).

  2. In applying the Method, to the extent that there was a value-for-value recapitalization
    of Preferred A into Preferred B, such recapitalization shall be disregarded, and the
    exchanging shareholder shall be considered to have acquired such newly issued stock
    as of the date it acquired the stock exchanged therefor.

CAVEATS

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter. In particular, no opinion is expressed as to whether or not—(i) any warrants
or options should have been treated as exercised under §1.382-4(d), and (ii) any
exchange of stock pursuant to a recapitalization represented a value for value
exchange. Further, no opinion is expressed on the value of the Preferred B or the
Warrants on the date of their issuance or what portion of the total value of the
consideration paid in redemption of the Preferred A that the Preferred B or the Warrants

PLR-154172-09 7

represented. One or more rulings given in this letter deal with issues that may be
addressed in subsequent published guidance. See section 11 of Rev. Proc. 2010-1,
2010-1 I.R.B. 1, 49-52, regarding the circumstances, including published guidance,
which may result in the revocation or modification of a ruling letter.

PROCEDURAL STATEMENTS

This ruling letter is directed only to the taxpayers who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, any taxpayer filing its return electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to the return that provides the date and control number of this
ruling letter.

In accordance with the power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this ruling letter
will be sent to your authorized representative.

                                    Sincerely,



                                    Mark S. Jennings
                                    Branch Chief, Branch 1
                                    Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.