PLR 1031006: IRS granted an extension to make a section 754 election
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The IRS granted a partnership an extension of time to make a valid IRC § 754 election. The partnership had transferred partnership interests but filed its return without a valid election to adjust the basis of partnership property. The IRS found that the requirements for relief under Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 were satisfied and granted 60 days from the letter date to make the election for the specified year and later years. The election had to be made in a written statement filed with the appropriate service center and attached to the ruling letter.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could the partnership receive additional time to make a valid section 754 election?
- Outcome: Approved
- Key authorities: IRC § 754; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.754-1(b) and 301.9100-3
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201031006 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 8/6/2010 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.00-00, 754.00-00
Person To Contact:
--------------------- -------------------, ID No. -------------
---------------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
--------------------------- ---------------------
-------------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
---------------------------------- CC:PSI:B02
PLR-108035-10
Date:
April 21, 2010
Legend
X = -----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------
State = -------------
D1 = ----------------
Year = -------
Dear --------------:
This responds to a letter dated February 16, 2010 submitted on behalf of X requesting
an extension of time under § 301.9100-1(c) of the Procedure and Administration
Regulations to elect to file a valid election under § 754 of the Internal Revenue Code
(“Code”).
FACTS
The information submitted states that on D1, members of X transferred partnership
interests to other members of X. X’s tax return for Year was filed without a valid § 754
election.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 754 provides that if a partnership files an election, in accordance with
regulations prescribed by the Secretary, the basis of partnership property shall be
adjusted, in the case of a distribution of property, in the manner provided in § 734 and,
PLR-108035-10 2
in the case of a transfer of a partnership interest, in the manner provided in § 743. Such
an election shall apply with respect to all distributions of property by the partnership and
to all transfers of interests in the partnership during the taxable year with respect to
which such election was filed and all subsequent taxable years.
Section 1.754-1(b) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that an election under § 754
to adjust the basis of partnership property under §§ 734(b) and 743(b), with respect to a
distribution of property to a partner or a transfer of an interest in a partnership, shall be
made in a written statement filed with the partnership return for the taxable year during
which the distribution or transfer occurs. For the election to be valid, the return must be
filed not later than the time prescribed by § 1.6031-1(e) (including extensions thereof)
for filing the return for such taxable year. The statement shall (i) set forth the name and
address of the partnership making the election, (ii) be signed by any one of the partners,
and (iii) contain a declaration that the partnership elects under § 754 to apply the
provisions of § 734(b) and § 743(b).
Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner may grant a reasonable
extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 to make a
regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months except in the
case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Code, except subtitles E, G,
H, and I. Section 301.9100-1(b) defines a regulatory election to include an election
whose due date is prescribed by a regulation published in the Federal Register.
Section 301.9100-2 provides the rules governing automatic extensions of time for
making certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards the Commissioner
will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time for regulatory elections that
do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.
Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to § 301.9100-3 will be
granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in
§ 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer
acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests
of the Government.
CONCLUSION
Based on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that the
requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. As a result, X is
granted an extension of time of sixty (60) days from the date of this letter to make an
election under § 754, effective for Year and thereafter. The election should be made in
a written statement filed with the appropriate service center for association with X's Year
return. A copy of this letter should be attached to the § 754 election.
PLR-108035-10 3
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter. Specifically, we express or imply no opinion as to whether or not X is a
partnership for federal tax purposes.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with the power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter will
be sent to the authorized representative of X.
Sincerely,
Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
By:__________________________
Melissa C. Liquerman, Branch Chief
Branch 2
Office of Chief Counsel
Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for section 6110 purposes
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.