CCA 1030034: QSubs disqualified a partnership from the small-partnership exception
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel advice agreed that a qualified subchapter S subsidiary, treated as a disregarded entity, was a pass-through partner. That status disqualified the partnership from the small-partnership exception to the TEFRA rules under Rev. Rul. 2004-88. The advice also concluded that the QSub could be designated as the tax matters partner if it was a separate entity under state law. A deemed liquidation when the S corporation election was made would not affect the designation because it occurred before the designation and only a state-law dissolution would terminate it.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Did the QSub's status affect the small-partnership exception and tax matters partner designation?
- Outcome: Advice given
- Key authorities: IRC § 6231; Rev. Rul. 2004-88
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2010072009035737 Number: 201030034
Release Date: 7/30/2010
Office: ----------
UILC: 6231.01-01
From: -------------------
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 9:04:02 AM
To: ----------------------------
Cc: -----------
Subject: RE: QSubs: Small Partnership exception and TMP questions
I agree completely with your analysis that a Qsub, in effect a disregarded entity, constitutes a pass-thru
partner and thus disqualifies the partnership from the small partnership exception to TEFRA under Rev.
Rul.2004-88. I also agree that it can be designated as TMP assuming that, at least under state law, it
constitutes a separate entity. The deemed liquidation of the Qsubs when the S corp election was made
should have no effect on the TMP designation both because it occurred before the TMP designation was
made and because only a state law dissolution would terminate a TMP designation.
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.