Private Letter Ruling 1029040 Released July 23, 2010 Approved Transcribed from scan

PLR 1029040: Cultural center property qualifies for foundation distribution treatment

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS ruled on a private non-operating foundation that acquired property and converted it into a cultural center for art exhibitions and culinary programs. It concluded that the fair market value of the property could be treated as a qualifying distribution under section 4942(g)(1) and the applicable regulations for the foundation's fiscal year. The property would also be excluded from the calculation of the foundation's minimum investment return. Reasonable and necessary operating and maintenance expenses attributable to the property would qualify as distributions. The ruling depended on the stated facts and did not express an opinion under other Code provisions.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the cultural center property and its reasonable operating expenses receive the requested section 4942 treatment?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 170, 4942, 501, 509, and 6110

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

Release Number: 201029040 Contact Person:

Release Date: 7/23/10

Date: April 29, 2010 Identification Number:
MXXXKKK
XXXXXKX Telephone Number:
MXXXXKXK

Employer Identification Number: XXXXXX

Uniform Issue List:

4942.03-05

Legend:

Property = XKKXKX
A = XXKXXXKX
B = XKXKXXXKK
C = XXKKKK
n = XXKXKKK
o = XKXKKKK
p = XKXKKXKK
q = XKXKKK
r = XXXXXKX
s = XXKXKX
Dear

This is in response to your ruling request dated February 27, 2009 concerning the
effects of your purchase, conversion, and maintenance of certain property in A.

You are a private non-operating foundation described in sections 501(c)(3) and section
509(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). You were established in A for general
charitable purposes.

XXXXXX

You make grants primarily to develop and strengthen programs and projects at
educational institutions in the academic areas of fine arts, science, business, law, and medicine
and at health institutions in the areas of heart, eye, and cancer for surgery, treatment, and
research. You also give consideration to grant applications from arts and cultural affairs
institutions, established civic community affairs institutions, and public affairs institutions.

On n, you acquired land and a building located at Property for $0. You formed B, a
limited liability company, wholly owned by you. You then contributed the Property to B.

On p, your Board of Directors (the “Board”) determined that the Property would be ideal
for the planned cultural center, and began planning how the Property could be used for
charitable, educational, and cultural purposes as well as what alterations and renovations were
needed to meet the Board’s goals. Through the subsequent three years, the Board was
engaged in renovations, plans, and negotiations which ultimately led to the opening of a cultural
center. The renovations included the construction of two art galleries; the
Gallery and the Gallery. The Gallery has an environmentally
constant temperature of 68 degrees Fahrenheit and humidity constant at 50 percent, thus
qualifying the cultural center for exhibitions with requirements of constant temperature and
humidity. The renovations also included the installation of a commercial grade kitchen for
culinary programs. The renovations began in q and were substantially completed in r.

The mission of this cultural center, C, is to promote the education, exploration, and
conservation of culture in A through art exhibitions and culinary programs.
The Board has developed a website for C that is meant to educate and inform the public as to
the purpose of the cultural center and its upcoming programs and events.

C's grand opening was held on s. Over people attended. The program for the grand
opening included the center’s first art exhibit and a demonstration and tasting with a
visiting chef.

Three four-hour long cooking classes were held shortly after the opening of C.

The art exhibit shown during the grand opening remained open to the general public, free of
charge, for most of the month in which C opened.

The Board plans to host up to four visiting chefs from various regions of per
year. The Board also plans to host at least four art exhibits annually, each with a duration
of two to three months. The Board is working with several museums to facilitate and coordinate
the provision of various art exhibitions.

The only other use that you may make of the Property is renting the Property free of
charge, or for a nominal fee, to other tax exempt art organizations.

RULINGS REQUESTED

You have requested the following rulings:

XXXXXX

  1. The fair market value of the Property is a qualifying distribution under section
    4942(g)(1) of the Code and section 53.4942(a)-3(a)(5) of the Foundation and Similar
    Excise Taxes Regulations (the “Regulations”) in your fiscal year ending October 31,
    2005.

  2. The fair market value of the Property is excluded from the calculation of your
    minimum investment return pursuant to section 4942(e)(1) of the Code.

  3. The expenses incurred in operating and maintaining the Property constitute
    qualifying distributions within the meaning of Section 4942(g)(1) of the Code.

LAW

Section 4942(a) of the Code imposes an excise tax of thirty percent on a private
nonoperating foundation’s undistributed income.

Section 4942(c) of the Code defines “undistributed income” as the amount by which the
distributable amount exceeds qualifying distributions.

Section 4942(d) of the Code defines “distributable amount” as the sum of the minimum
investment return and certain recouped qualifying distributions reduced by the sum of the taxes
imposed on the private foundation for the taxable year under subtitle A and section 4940 of the
Code.

Section 4942(e)(1) of the Code defines “minimum investment return” as five percent of
the excess of the aggregate fair market value of all assets of the foundation other than those
which are used, or held for use, directly in carrying out the foundation's exempt purpose, over
the acquisition indebtedness with respect to those assets.

Section 4942(g)(1) of the Code defines “qualifying distribution” as any amount (including
that portion of reasonable and necessary administrative expenses) paid to accomplish one or
more purposes described in section 170(c)(2)(B) of the Code, other than certain contributions,
and any amount paid to acquire an asset used, or held for use, directly in carrying out one or
more purposes described in section 170(c)(2)(B).

Section 53.4942(a)-2(c)(3)(i) of the Regulations states, among other things, that an
asset is “used (or held for use) directly in carrying out the foundation's exempt purpose” only if
the asset is actually used by the foundation in the carrying out of the charitable, educational, or
other similar purpose which gives rise to the exempt status of the foundation.

Section 53.4942(a)-2(c)(3)(ii)(b) of the Regulations provides that real estate or the
portion of a building used by the foundation directly in its charitable, educational, or other similar
exempt activities is an example of an asset that is used, or held for use, directly in carrying out
the foundation's exempt purpose.

Section 53.4942(a)-2(c)(3)(ii)(f) of the Regulations provides that any property leased by
a foundation in carrying out its charitable, educational, or other similar exempt purpose at no

XXXXXX

cost (or at a nominal rent) to the lessee is an example of an asset that is used, or held for use,
directly in carrying out the foundation's exempt purpose.

Section 53.4942(a)-3(a)(5) of the Regulations states that if an asset that was not used,
or held for use, directly in carrying out one or more of the foundation’s exempt purposes is
subsequently converted to such a use, the fair market value of that converted asset as of the
date of its conversion may be treated as a qualifying distribution.

Example 1 of section 53.4942(a)-3(a)(8) of the Regulations provides that both
compensation to employees for performing work on activities in furtherance of an exempt
purpose and overhead attributable to activities in furtherance of an exempt purpose are
examples of reasonable administrative expenses paid to accomplish section 170(c)(1) or (2)(B)
purposes under section 4942(g)(1) of the Code.

Example 3 of section 53.4942(a)-3(a)(8) of the Regulations provides that the purchase of
a building for the exhibition of paintings by a private foundation engaged in holding paintings
and exhibiting them to the public is a qualifying distribution.

Rev. Rul. 78-102, 1978-1 C.B. 379, addresses the correct conversion date of real
property for the purposes of section 53.4942(a)-3(a)(5) of the Regulations. The ruling states that
the date of conversion is the date the foundation adopts and immediately proceeds to
implement a plan for the exempt use of the property, even though the actual conversion is not
completed until later.

ANALYSIS

You have used and plan to use the Property to exhibit art and host culinary classes. This
is similar to Example 3 of section 53.4942(a)-3(a)(8) of the Regulations. As such, this use of the
Property would be deemed to be directly in carrying out your exempt purposes in accordance
with section 53.4942(a)-2(c)(3)(ii)(b) of the Regulations.

Issue 1:

Because the Property is being used, or held for use, directly in carrying out your exempt
purpose, any amount paid to acquire the Property would be treated as a qualifying distribution
under section 4942(g)(1) of the Code. Since the Property was not used, or held for use, directly
in carrying out your exempt purpose until sometime after its purchase, the date that the Property
was converted to such a use is the date on which the amount paid to acquire the Property would
be treated as a qualifying distribution. According to Rev. Rul. 78-102, the date of conversion
should be the date that you adopted and immediately proceeded to implement a plan for the
exempt use of the property. The Board determined that the Property would be ideal for the
planned cultural center, and began planning how the Property could be used for charitable,
educational, and cultural purposes as well as what alterations and renovations were needed to
meet the Board’s goals on p. Thus, the appropriate date on which the amount paid to acquire
the Property may be treated as a qualifying distribution by you is p.

Issue 2:

XXXXXX

Since the Property is being used, or held for use, directly in carrying out your exempt
purpose, its fair market value will be excluded from the determination of your minimum
investment return pursuant to section 4942(e)(1) of the Code.

Issue 3:

Example 1 of section 53.4942(a)-3(a)(8) of the Regulations provides that reasonable
overhead attributable to activities in furtherance of an exempt purpose is an example of
reasonable administrative expenses paid to accomplish section 170(c)(1) or (2)(B) purposes
under section 4942(g)(1) of the Code. Under this logic, since the Property is being used, or held
for use, directly in carrying out your exempt purpose, reasonable operational and maintenance
expenses attributable to the Property are administrative expenses paid to accomplish section
170(c)(1) or (2)(B) purposes under section 4942(g)(1) of the Code.

In view of the foregoing, we rule as follows:

  1. The fair market value of the Property is a qualifying distribution under section
    4942(g)(1) of the Code and section 53.4942(a)-3(a)(5) of the Regulations in your
    fiscal year ending October 31, 2005.

  2. The fair market value of the Property is excluded from the calculation of your
    minimum investment return pursuant to section 4942(e)(1) of the Code.

  3. The expenses incurred in operating and maintaining the Property, to the extent
    reasonable and necessary, constitute qualifying distributions within the meaning of
    Section 4942(g)(1) of the Code.

These rulings are based on the understanding that there will be no material changes in
the facts upon which it is based.

We express no opinion as to the tax consequences of the proposed transaction under
any other section of the Code.

Pursuant to a Power of Attorney on file in this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to
your authorized representatives. A copy of this letter should be kept in your permanent records.

These rulings are directed only to the organization that requested them. Section
6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

XXXXXX
If there are any questions about this ruling, please contact the person whose name and
telephone number are shown in the heading of this letter.
Sincerely,
/s/
Theodore R. Lieber

Manager, Exempt Organizations
Technical Group 3

Enclosure
Notice 437

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.