PLR 1029016: IRS consents to a retroactive qualified electing fund election

Plain-English summary

A corporation asked for consent to make a retroactive qualified electing fund, or QEF, election for its investment in a foreign corporation treated as a passive foreign investment company. The corporation intended to make the election, but an accounting firm incorrectly identified the shareholder on Form 8621 and attached the forms to another company's return. The IRS concluded that the corporation had satisfied the requirements for retroactive consent under Treas. Reg. § 1.1295-3(f), including reliance on qualified tax professionals, affidavits describing the error, and the absence of an IRS audit challenge to the foreign corporation's PFIC status. Consent was granted subject to compliance with the time and manner rules in Treas. Reg. § 1.1295-3(g).

Ruling snapshot

• Question: Could the corporation make a retroactive QEF election for Year 2 under Treas. Reg. § 1.1295-3(f)?
• Outcome: approved, subject to the applicable time and manner rules
• Key authorities: IRC § 1295; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1295-3(f), 1.1295-3(g); IRC § 6110(k)(3)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201029016 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 7/23/2010 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1295.02-02
Person To Contact:
--------------------------------- -----------------, ID No. -------------
------------------ Telephone Number:
----------------------------------------- ---------------------
------------------------------------ Refer Reply To:
CC:INTL:B02
PLR-149318-09
Date:
April 21, 2010

     -------------

Legend

Taxpayer = ----------------------------------------------
----------------------

FC = --------------------------------------------
----------------------

State X = -------------
Country Y = ---------

Company A = ------------------------------------------
Company B = ----------------------------------
Company C = -----------------------------------------

D = ----
E = --------

Date 1 = ----------------------
Date 2 = ------------------
Date 3 = ----------------------

Year 1 = -------
Year 2 = -------
Year 3 = -------

PLR-149318-09 2

Accounting Firm 1 = --------------------------
Accounting Firm 2 = ----------------------------------------

Dear ---------------:

   This is in response to your letter received by our office on November 9, 2009,

requesting the consent of the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service to make a
retroactive qualified electing fund ("QEF") election under section 1295(b) of the Internal
Revenue Code ("Code") and Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f) with respect to your investment
in FC.

  The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and

representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury
statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the
material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on
examination.

FACTS

   Taxpayer is a State X corporation. Taxpayer and Company A, a Real Estate

Investment Trust (Taxpayer’s indirect shareholder), both made an election to treat
Taxpayer as a taxable REIT subsidiary effective Date 1. Company B (Taxpayer’s
majority direct shareholder) is an operating partnership owned primarily by Company A.
Taxpayer is a calendar year taxpayer and uses the accrual method of accounting.

  Taxpayer is engaged in the business of developing, managing and leasing

income producing real estate projects owned by third parties as well as projects in
which Company A has an indirect ownership interest with non-affiliated partners.

   FC is a Country Y joint stock corporation. Taxpayer holds a D percent direct

interest in FC and a E percent indirect interest through its disregarded single member
LLC, Company C. Taxpayer and Company C acquired their joint venture interests in FC
on Date 2. The formation of the joint venture was to provide services related to the
development, general planning, leasing and management of shopping centers and other
commercial real estate in Country Y.

   Since Year 1, Accounting Firm 1 has been engaged to perform U.S. tax

compliance review services for Taxpayer and has signed all of Taxpayer’s U.S. income
tax returns as the preparer. Since Year 2, Accounting Firm 2 has been engaged to
prepare and sign U.S. information returns with respect to Taxpayer’s investment in FC.
Both accounting firms employed tax professionals competent to render U.S. tax advice
with respect to stock ownership of a foreign corporation. Also, both accounting firms
had full access to all the information and facts relating to Taxpayer’s ownership of FC
stock and Taxpayer relied on the advice of both accounting firms with regards to
complying with U.S. tax laws.

   Taxpayer intended to make the section 1295 election with respect to FC for Year

2. Accounting Firm 2 calculated Taxpayer’s pro-rata share of taxable income with
   respect to FC for Year 2 and sent such calculations to Taxpayer on Date 3. These
   taxable income amounts were appropriately identified by Accounting Firm 1 and
   included in Taxpayer’s Year 2 federal income tax return. Further, Accounting Firm 2
   prepared IRS Form 5471, “Information Return of U.S. Persons With Respect To Certain
   Foreign Corporations”, and IRS Form 8621, “Return by a Shareholder of a Passive
   Foreign Investment Company of Qualified Electing Fund” for Taxpayer with respect to
   FC. However, on IRS Form 8621, Accounting Firm 2 incorrectly stated Company B as
   the shareholder/taxpayer instead of Taxpayer. Accounting Firm 1 did not identify this
   error and the forms pertaining to FC were attached to Company B’s Year 2 income tax
   return. This error was discovered during the review of Taxpayer’s tax return for Year 3.
   As a result, Taxpayer did not make a timely QEF election with respect to FC for Year 2.

   Taxpayer has submitted affidavits, signed under penalties of perjury, describing
   the events that led to the failure to make the QEF election by the election due date,
   including the role of Accounting Firm 1 and Accounting Firm 2. Taxpayer has also
   submitted affidavits from Accounting Firm 1 and Accounting Firm 2 corroborating the
   statements made by Taxpayer.

   Taxpayer represents that as of the date of this request for ruling, the PFIC status
   of FC has not been raised by the IRS on audit for any of the taxable years at issue.

RULING REQUESTED

  Taxpayer requests the consent of the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue

Service to make a retroactive QEF election with respect to FC for Year 2 under Treas.
Reg. §1.1295-3(f).

LAW

   Section 1295(a) of the Code provides that any PFIC shall be treated as a QEF

with respect to a taxpayer if (1) an election by the taxpayer under section 1295(b)
applies to such company for the taxable year and (2) the company complies with such
requirements as the Secretary may prescribe for purposes of determining the ordinary
earnings and net capital gains of such company.

PLR-149318-09 4

   Under section 1295(b)(2), a QEF election may be made for any taxable year at

any time on or before the due date (determined with regard to extensions) for filing the
return for such taxable year. To the extent provided in regulations, such an election may
be made after such due date if the taxpayer failed to make an election by the due date
because the taxpayer reasonably believed the company was not a PFIC.

Under Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f), a taxpayer may request the consent of the

Commissioner to make a retroactive QEF election for a taxable year if:

   1. the shareholder reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, within the
      meaning of Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f)(2);
   2. granting consent will not prejudice the interests of the United States
      government, as provided in Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f)(3);
   3. the request is made before a representative of the Internal Revenue Service
      raises upon audit the PFIC status of the corporation for any taxable year of
      the shareholder; and
   4. the shareholder satisfies the procedural requirements of Treas. Reg. §1.1295-
      3(f)(4).

   The procedural requirements include filing a request for consent to make a

retroactive election with, and submitting a user fee to, the Office of the Associate Chief
Counsel (International). Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f)(4)(i). Additionally, affidavits signed
under penalties of perjury must be submitted that describe:

   1. the events which led to the failure to make a QEF election by the election due
      date;
   2. the discovery of such failure;
   3. the engagement and responsibilities of the qualified tax professional; and
   4. the extent to which the shareholder relied on such professional.

Treas. Reg. §§1.1295-3(f)(4)(ii) and (iii).

CONCLUSION

    Based on the information submitted and representations made with Taxpayer’s

ruling request, we conclude that Taxpayer has satisfied Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f).
Accordingly, consent is granted to Taxpayer to make a retroactive QEF election with
respect to FC for Year 2, provided that Taxpayer complies with the rules under Treas.
Reg. §1.1295-3(g) regarding the time and manner for making the retroactive QEF
election.

PLR-149318-09 5

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of

the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

  A copy of this ruling must be attached to any tax return to which it is relevant.

                                  Sincerely,



                                  Jeffery G. Mitchell
                                  Special Counsel
                                  (International)