PLR 1029014: IRS explains when a trust may materially participate in a subsidiary's activities
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A complex trust asked whether it could materially participate in the activities of a subsidiary held through a partnership and another company. The IRS concluded that a trust may materially participate if its fiduciary, here the trustee, is involved in the activity's operations on a regular, continuous, and substantial basis. The IRS treated the trustee's activities as the relevant measure because the trustee acts for the trust's beneficial owners. It did not determine whether the trustee actually materially participated or whether the subsidiary's activities formed an appropriate economic unit.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May the trust materially participate in the activities of D under IRC § 469?
- Outcome: approved, subject to the trustee meeting the stated participation standard
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 469, 641, 661, 662, and 6110(k)(3); Temp. Treas. Reg. § 1.469-2T(b)(1); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.469-5T and 1.469-8
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201029014 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 7/23/2010 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 469.01-01
Person To Contact:
----------------------------------------------- ------------------, ID No. -------------
------------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
---------------------------------------- ---------------------
------------------------------ Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B01
PLR-148716-09
Date: April 7, 2010
Legend:
Trust = --------------------------------------------
A = ------------------------------
B = -------------------
C = --------------------
D = -------------------------------
Dear -----------------:
This responds to the letter dated -----------------------, submitted on behalf of Trust,
requesting guidance under § 469 of the Internal Revenue Code.
Facts
According to the information submitted, Trust is a complex trust. A is the
beneficiary and a trustee of Trust. Trust holds various assets including a partnership
interest in B. B wholly owns C, which wholly owns D. Trust requests a ruling under
§ 469 as to whether Trust can materially participate in the activities of D.
Law and Analysis
Section 469(a)(1) disallows the passive activity loss for any taxable year to any
individual, estate or trust, any closely held C corporation, and any personal service
corporation. The passive activity loss for a given year is the amount, if any, by which
the passive activity deductions for the taxable year exceed the passive activity gross
income for the taxable year. Temp. Treas. Reg. § 1.469-2T(b)(1). Section 469(c)(1)
PLR-148716-09 2
defines the term “passive activity” to include any activity which involves the conduct of
any trade or business in which the taxpayer does not materially participate.
Section 469(h)(1) provides that a taxpayer materially participates in an activity
only if the taxpayer is involved in the operations of the activity on a basis which is
regular, continuous, and substantial. The legislative history to § 469 contains significant
discussion of the concept of material participation. Embodied throughout the discussion
is a general notion that in order for a taxpayer to materially participate, the taxpayer
must be involved in the day-to-day operations of the trade or business: “Even an
intermittent role in management, while relevant, does not establish material participation
in the absence of regular, continuous, and substantial involvement in operations.” S.
Rep. No. 99-313, 99th Cong., 2d Sess. 734 (May 26, 1986), Vol. 3 1986-3 C.B. 734.
For individuals, the qualitative test of § 469(h)(1) has largely been replaced by
the more quantitative regulatory tests of Temp. Treas. Reg. §§ 1.469-5T(a)(1)-(7) of the
Income Tax Regulations. The Treasury Department has not yet issued regulations
addressing the material participation requirement for trusts and estates. See Treas.
Reg. §§ 1.469-5(T)(g), 1.469-8. Until regulations are promulgated, § 469(h)(1) remains
the sole standard for determining whether a trust or estate satisfies the material
participation requirement of § 469. Cf. Hillman v. IRS, 263 F.3d 338 (4th Cir. 2001)
(while the government's authority to issue regulations exempting certain self-charged
fees from the ambit of § 469 was clearly contemplated by Congress, the failure to do so
did not obviate the basic statutory rule that the fees in question were passive activity
deductions). The statutory standard for material participation can be applied in the
absence of regulations. See Housing Pioneers v. Commissioner, 58 F.3d 401 (9th Cir.
1995) (applying statutory requirement of regular, continuous, and substantial
involvement to a tax-exempt entity in a case where an unrelated statute explicitly
borrows the language of § 469.)
PLR-148716-09 3
As noted above, other than the “regular, continuous, and substantial” language of
§ 469(h)(1), there is an absence of explicit statutory or regulatory guidance regarding
how a trust establishes material participation. Nonetheless, the legislative history of §
469 provides important insight into how Congress intended for the material participation
standard to apply to trusts: “Special rules apply in the case of taxable entities that are
subject to the passive loss rule. An estate or trust is treated as materially participating in
an activity…if an executor or fiduciary, in his capacity as such, is so participating.” S.
Rep. No. 99-313, at 735.
Determining the proper focus in § 469 for the activities of Trust is a question of
federal tax law and must include an examination of the treatment of trusts under
Subchapter J. The taxation of trusts under Subchapter J is a hybrid regime involving an
entity-level tax as well as the pass-through of income to the beneficiaries. While a trust
is sometimes required to pay tax on its own income under § 641, it may also generally
deduct under § 661 income that is passed through to its beneficiaries under § 662.
Although the beneficiaries of a trust do not generally participate in the activities of the
trust, the designated trustee acts on behalf of, and in the interests of, the beneficiaries.
The focus on a trustee's activities for purposes of § 469 accords with the general
policy rationale underlying the passive loss regime. As a general matter, the owner of a
business may not look to the activities of the owner's employees to satisfy the material
participation requirement. See S. Rep. No. 99-313, at 735 (1986) (“the activities of
[employees]…are not attributed to the taxpayer.”). Indeed, because an owner's trade or
business will generally involve employees or agents, a contrary approach would result in
an owner invariably being treated as materially participating in the trade or business
activity. A trustee performs its duties on behalf of the beneficial owners. Consistent
with the treatment of other business owners, therefore, it is appropriate in the trust
context to look only to the activities of the trustee. Thus, the sole means for a trust to
establish material participation is if its fiduciary is involved in the operations of the
activity on a regular, continuous, and substantial basis.
Conclusion
Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, Trust may
materially participate in D’s activities if the trustee, in this case A, is involved in the
operations of D’s activities on a regular, continuous, and substantial basis. No opinion
is expressed concerning whether A in fact materially participates in D’s activities or
whether D’s activities constitute an appropriate economic unit under § 1.469-4(c).
Except as specifically set forth above, no opinion is expressed or implied as to
the federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provision of
the Code.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
Pursuant to the power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter will
be sent to Trust’s authorized representative.
PLR-148716-09 4
Sincerely,
/s/
David R. Haglund
Branch Chief, Branch 1
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)
Enclosures:
Copy of this letter
Copy for ' 6110 purposes
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.