CCA 201028040: Chief Counsel allowed credit for FIRPTA withholding not remitted by the buyer

Number
201028040
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Withholding of Tax on Dispositions of United States Real Property Interests (See Also 897.00-00).
Topics
Code sections
§ 6651, § 897, § 1445, § 1461, § 1462
Ruling dated
June 15, 2010
Publicly released
July 16, 2010

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel Advice concluded that a nonresident alien seller could receive credit for tax withheld under FIRPTA even though the buyer did not remit the withheld amount to the IRS. The seller had to file the required U.S. tax return and provide substantial evidence, such as closing documents, showing the amount withheld. The advice explained that the withholding regulations permit this evidence when the IRS has not provided a stamped Form 8288-A. It also noted that the buyer remained liable for the required withholding and related filing and payment penalties.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the seller claim credit for tax withheld from the sale of U.S. real property when the buyer never paid the withholding to the IRS?
  • Outcome: advice given
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 897(c)(1)(A)(i), 1445(a), 1461, 1462, and 6651; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.897-1(c)(1)(i), 1.1445-1(b)(1), 1.1445-1(d), 1.1445-1(e), 1.1445-1(f)(1)-(3), and 1.1445-3(g)

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2010061517383622 Number: 201028040
Release Date: 7/16/2010
Office: -----------
UILC: 1445.00-00

From: ---------------------
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 5:38:37 PM
To: ------------------
Cc: ----------------
Subject: advice on FIRPTA

Thanks for your patience while I coordinated with the IRC § 1445 experts within Counsel (------------). Here is a written explanation that you can provide to the Service Center in bringing resolution to your case.

Facts
A nonresident alien sold real property located in the United States, which is a United States real property interest (USRPI) as defined in IRC § 897(c)(1)(A)(i) and Treas. Reg. § 1.897-1(c)(1)(i). The buyer withheld 10% of the amount realized on the sale, as required under IRC § 1445(a) and Treas. Reg. § 1.1445-1(b)(1). However, the buyer did not pay over the amount withheld to the IRS. Consequently, the nonresident alien seller did not receive a stamped copy of Form 8288-A from the IRS. The seller filed a U.S. tax return on which it sought a credit in the amount withheld against his tax liability, and sought a refund of the excess amount withheld. To date, the Service Center has refused to grant the credit because it has no record of receiving the amount withheld from the buyer, as in fact the buyer had not paid over the amount withheld.

Issue
Whether the seller is entitled to the credit (and thus a refund) even though the amount withheld was never paid to the IRS.

Conclusion
Yes, the seller is entitled to the credit (and thus a refund in this case), provided that the seller has substantial evidence (e.g., closing documents) of the amount of the credit.

Analysis
Treas. Reg. § 1.1445-1(f)(1) (last sentence) provides that "[a]ny tax withheld under section 1445(a) shall be credited against the amount of income tax as computed in [the seller's] return." See also IRC § 1462 (granting a credit for income tax withheld at the source). Treas. Reg. § 1.1445-1(f)(2) provides that generally a stamped copy of Form 8288-A (Statement of Withholding on Dispositions by Foreign Persons of U.S. Real Property Interests) must be attached to the seller's return to establish the amount withheld which is available as a credit. If the amount withheld under IRC § 1445(a) exceeds the seller's maximum tax liability with respect to the disposition (as determined by the IRS), then the seller may seek an early refund of the excess pursuant to Treas. Reg. § 1.1445-3(g), or a normal refund upon the filing of a tax return.

Treas. Reg. § 1.1445-1(f)(3)(i) provides that if a stamped copy of Form 8288-A has not been provided to the seller by the IRS, the seller may establish the amount of tax withheld by the buyer by attaching to its tax return substantial evidence (e.g., closing documents) of such amount. Such a seller must attach to its return a statement which supplies all of the information required by Treas. Reg. § 1.1445-1(d), including the seller's identifying number. The preamble to T.D. 8113 (Dec. 24, 1986), which finalized the IRC § 1445 withholding regulations, explains that Treas. Reg. § 1.1445-1(f)(3)(i) was promulgated specifically to deal with the situation in which the buyer failed to remit the withheld funds to the IRS. Accordingly, if the seller filed the requisite tax return and establishes the amount withheld through substantial evidence, the Service Center should grant a credit to the seller to the extent the amount withheld exceeds his maximum tax liability with respect to the disposition, as determined by the IRS.

It should be noted that IRC § 1461 and Treas. Reg. § 1.1445-1(e) impose liability on the buyer for the tax which it was required to withhold. In addition, IRC § 6651 imposes penalties on the buyer for failure to file Form 8288 when due, and for failure to pay the withholding when due.

-------------has spoken with the --------------attorney who previously provided you advice in this case, and all parties are now in agreement that credit for the withholding is permissible even though the amount withheld was never paid to the IRS. Thus, please disregard the advice previously provided by ---------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace