PLR 1028029: The IRS treated merger consideration as a separate intercompany transaction

Plain-English summary

The IRS ruled on a proposed restructuring in which a parent corporation would create a new holding company for one business line by merging six subsidiaries into newly formed merger subsidiaries. In each merger, the parent group's first-tier subsidiary would receive voting stock and other property from the new holding company. The IRS ruled that the other property received in each merger would be treated as received in a separate transaction immediately after the merger under Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-13(f)(3)(ii). The ruling was based on the taxpayer's representations and did not address whether the mergers independently qualified as reorganizations under IRC § 368(a)(1)(A) and § 368(a)(2)(E). The ruling illustrates how consolidated-group rules can separate merger consideration for intercompany tax treatment.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: How would other property received in six related mergers be treated for consolidated-return purposes?
• Outcome: approved
• Key authorities: IRC §§ 1502, 351, 356, and 368; Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-13(f)(3)(ii)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201028029 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 7/16/2010 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
Index Number: 1502.13-00, 351.00-00, ---------------------, ID No. -------------
Telephone Number:
368.01-02, 358.05-02
---------------------
Refer Reply To:
--------------------------------------------- CC:CORP:B06
--------------------------------------------- PLR-154028-09
-------------------------------------------- Date:
------------------------------- March 19, 2010

LEGEND

Parent = -----------------------------------------------

Corp A = ----------------------------------------------

Corp B = ---------------------------

Sub 1 = ------------------

Sub 2 = ------------------------

Sub 3 = ------------------------

Sub 4 = ----------------------------------------

PLR-154028-09 2

Sub 5 = ----------------------------------------------------

Sub 6 = -----------------------------------

Merger Sub 1 = ---------------------------------

Merger Sub 2 = -------------------------------------

Merger Sub 3 = -----------------------------------------------

Merger Sub 4 = --------------------------------------------------

Merger Sub 5 = --------------------------------------------------------------

Merger Sub 6 = --------------------------------------------------------------

     ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Y Business = -------------------------

Z Business = ------------------------

Y Subs = ------------

Y Merger Subs = -----------------------

LLC 1 = ------------------------------
PLR-154028-09 3

LLC 2 = ------------------------------------------------

LLC 3 = --------------------------------------

State a = --------------

State b = -------------

State c = -------------

Dear ------------:

This letter responds to your December 11, 2009, letter requesting rulings on certain
federal income tax consequences of a proposed transaction described below (the
“Proposed Transaction”). Additional information was received. The information
provided in these letters is summarized below.

                              Facts

Parent is a domestic state a corporation and is the Parent corporation of an affiliated
group of corporations that files a federal consolidated income tax return. “Parent
Group”

Corp A, a state a first tier wholly owned subsidiary of Parent, and a member of the
Parent Group, owns all the stock of Corp B, a newly formed state b corporation that is a
member of the Parent Group. Corp A owns all the stock of Sub 1, Sub 2, Sub 3, Sub 4,
Sub 5 and Sub 6. Each of Sub 1, Sub 2, Sub 3, Sub 4, Sub 5 and Sub 6 is a domestic
corporation and a member of the Parent Group. Sub 1, Sub 4 and Sub 5 are state b
corporations. Sub 2 and Sub 6 are state c corporations. Sub 3 is a state a corporation.

Sub 1, Sub 2, Sub 3, Sub 4, Sub 5 and Sub 6 each conduct part of the Y Business.
Other members of the Parent Group conduct the Z business.

Corp B owns all the membership interests of each of LLC 1, LLC 2 and LLC 3. Each of
LLC 1, LLC 2 and LLC 3 is a single member state b limited liability company that is
disregarded for federal income tax purposes within the meaning of § 301.7701-3(b) of
the Income Tax Regulations.

LLC 1 owns all the stock of Merger Sub 1. LLC 2 owns all the stock Merger Sub 2.
LLC 3 owns all the stock of Merger Sub 3, Merger Sub 4, Merger Sub 5 and Merger Sub

6. Merger Sub 1, Merger Sub 2, Merger Sub 3, Merger Sub 4, Merger Sub 5 and
   PLR-154028-09 4

Merger Sub 6 are newly formed state b corporations. Each of the Y Merger Subs was
formed for the purpose of the Proposed Transactions (as defined below).

                           Proposed Transactions

To improve efficiency and simplify its corporate structure to reflect the separation
between the Y Business and the Z Business, Parent will restructure a number of its
subsidiaries so that Corp B will be the new holding company for the Y Business.
Following the internal restructuring, Corp B will own, directly or indirectly, the Y Subs,
which conduct the Y Business and Corp B will not own or conduct the Z Business. The
internal restructuring will include the following steps (the “Proposed Transactions”):

(i) Merger Sub 1 will merge with and into Sub 1 and Sub 1 will be the surviving
corporation (“Merger 1”). In Merger 1, Corp A will receive voting common stock of
Corp B and “other property” within the meaning of § 356(a)(1)(B).

(ii) Merger Sub 2 will merge with and into Sub 2 and Sub 2 will be the surviving
corporation (“Merger 2”). In Merger 2, Corp A will receive voting common stock of
Corp B and “other property” within the meaning of § 356(a)(1)(B).

(iii) Merger Sub 3 will merge with and into Sub 3 and Sub 3 will be the surviving
corporation (“Merger 3”). In Merger 3, Corp A will receive voting common stock of
Corp B and “other property” within the meaning of § 356(a)(1)(B).

(iv) Merger Sub 4 will merge with and into Sub 4 and Sub 4 will be the surviving
corporation (“Merger 4”). In Merger 4, Corp A will receive voting common stock of
Corp B and “other property” within the meaning of § 356(a)(1)(B).

(v) Merger Sub 5 will merge with and into Sub 5 and Sub 5 will be the surviving
corporation (“Merger 5”). In Merger 5, Corp A will receive voting common stock of
Corp B and “other property” within the meaning of § 356(a)(1)(B).

(vi) Merger Sub 6 will merge with and into Sub 6 and Sub 6 will be the surviving
corporation (“Merger 6”). In Merger 6, Corp A will receive voting common stock of
Corp B and “other property” within the meaning of § 356(a)(1)(B).

After the Proposed Transactions, Parent will continue as the common parent of the
Parent Group.

                               Representations

The taxpayer has submitted the following representations in connection with the
Proposed Transaction:
PLR-154028-09 5

(i) Each of Merger 1, Merger 2, Merger 3, Merger 4, Merger 5 and Merger 6 will qualify
as a reorganization under section 368(a)(1)(A) by reason of the application of
section 368(a)(2)(E) of the Code;

(ii) Neither Corp A, Corp B nor any of the Y Subs will become a member of the
Parent Group or a nonmember of the Parent Group as part of the Proposed
Transactions within the meaning of section 1.1502-13(f)(3)(i) of the Income Tax
Regulations;

                                 Rulings

  Based solely on the information submitted and the representations set forth
  above, we rule that the other property received by Corp A in Merger 1, Merger 2,
  Merger 3, Merger 4, Merger 5 and Merger 6 will be treated as having been
  received by Corp A in a separate transaction immediately after each merger
  pursuant to section 1.1502-13(f)(3)(ii) of the Income Tax Regulations.

                                  Caveats

  The rulings contained in this letter are based on facts and representations
  submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement
  executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the
  materials submitted in support of the request for rulings. Verification of the
  information, representations, and other data may be required as part of the audit
  process.

  We express no opinion about the tax treatment of the transactions described
  above under other provisions of the Code or Income Tax Regulations, or the tax
  treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting from, the
  transactions described above that are not specifically covered by the above
  rulings.

  In particular we express no opinion on whether each of Merger 1, Merger 2,
  Merger 3, Merger 4, Merger 5 and Merger 6 will qualify as a reorganization under
  section 368(a)(1)(A) by reason of the application of section 368(a)(2)(E) of the
  Code.

                                Procedure

  This ruling letter is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)
  provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

  A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is
  relevant. Alternatively, any taxpayer filing its return electronically may satisfy this

PLR-154028-09 6

 requirement by attaching a statement to the return that provides the date and
 control number of this letter ruling.

 In accordance with the power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this ruling
 letter will be sent to your authorized representative.


                                 Sincerely,



                                 Virginia S. Voorhees
                                 Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 6
                                 Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)



 cc: