PLR 1026041: IRS granted more time to recharacterize an ineligible Roth IRA conversion
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The IRS granted a taxpayer 60 days to recharacterize a Roth IRA conversion as a contribution to a traditional IRA. The taxpayer and spouse had relied on investment losses that were later challenged by the IRS, which caused their adjusted gross income to exceed the limit for a Roth conversion. The IRS found that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith and that the tax year was not closed for purposes of the relief request. The recharacterization was limited to the converted amount, and the ruling assumed that the IRAs otherwise qualified under the Code.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could the taxpayer receive additional time to recharacterize a Roth IRA conversion after an IRS challenge to reported investment losses made the conversion ineligible?
- Outcome: approved, with a 60-day recharacterization period and the stated limitations
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 408, 408A, and 6110(k)(3); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.408A-4, 1.408A-5, and 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3
Full text (IRS public release)
201026041
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION
UIL: 408.00-00 APR - 7 2010
408A.00-00
T: EP: RA: T3
Legend:
Taxpayer A: [illegible]
Taxpayer B: [illegible]
Fund F: [illegible]
IRA X: [illegible]
Roth IRA Y: [illegible]
Company D: [illegible]
Firm G: [illegible]
Year 1: [illegible]
Date 1: [illegible]
Date 2: [illegible]
Amount L: [illegible]
Amount M: [illegible]
2 201026041
Dear [illegible]:
In a letter dated [illegible], you, through your authorized representative,
requested a ruling in which you request relief under section 301.9100-3 of the Procedure
and Administration Regulations. The request was supplemented by an E-Mail dated
[illegible]. The following facts and representations support your ruling request.
Taxpayer A is married to Taxpayer B. With respect to the tax years relevant to this
request for letter ruling, Taxpayers A and B filed a joint Federal Tax Return (Federal
Form 1040).
During Year 1, Taxpayers A and B invested in Fund F. Taxpayers A and B suffered
losses from their investment in Fund F which losses affected their Federal adjusted gross
income with respect to their 2007 tax year. Said losses were reported on their 2007 tax
year Federal Form 1040.
It has been represented that Taxpayers A and B relied upon the advice of long standing
investment advisors prior to investing in Fund F.
Taxpayer A maintained IRA X, an individual retirement arrangement described in section
408(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”), with Company D. On or about Date
1, 2007, Taxpayer A converted IRA X in the amount of Amount L to a Roth IRA, Roth
IRA Y, also with Company D. At the time of the conversion, Taxpayers A and B
believed their Federal adjusted gross income for 2007 would not exceed the limit found at
section 408A(c)(3)(B) of the Code because of the losses they suffered from their
investment in Fund F.
Subsequent to the to the IRA “conversion” referenced above, the Internal Revenue
Service (“Service”) began a national audit of Fund F on the basis investment in said Fund
F constituted a tax shelter transaction. Taxpayers A and B have been advised by the
Service that it intends to disallow their “claimed” loss from investing in Fund F in the
amount of Amount M. Such disallowance would result in Taxpayers A and B having a
tax year 2007 adjusted gross income that exceeded the limit found in section
408A(c)(3)(B) of the Code which would make Taxpayer A ineligible to have made the
above referenced conversion of IRA X to Roth IRA Y.
On or about Date 2, 2009, the Service issued a Form 906 Settlement Adjustment to
Taxpayers A and B relating to its proposed denial of their “claimed” losses stemming
from their investment in Fund F. It has been asserted on behalf of Taxpayers A and B by
their authorized representative that Taxpayers A and B will settle the Fund F loss issue if
the Service issues a favorable response to their letter ruling request.
3 201026041
Taxpayers A and B timely filed their calendar year joint Federal Income Tax Return
which return was prepared by Firm G.
Based on the above you request the following letter ruling:
That, pursuant to section 301.9100-3 of the regulations, Taxpayer A is granted a
period not to exceed [illegible] months from the date of this ruling letter to recharacterize his
Roth IRA Y to a traditional IRA.
With respect to your request for relief under section 301.9100-3 of the regulations,
section 408A(d)(6) of the Code and section 1.408A-5 of the Income Tax Regulations
provide that, except as otherwise provided by the Secretary, a taxpayer may elect to
recharacterize an IRA contribution made to one type of IRA as having been made to
another type of IRA by making a trustee-to-trustee transfer of the IRA contribution, plus
earnings, to the other type of IRA. In a recharacterization, the IRA contribution is treated
as having been made to the transferee IRA and not to the transferor IRA. Under section
408A(d)(6) and section 1.408A-5, this recharacterization election generally must occur
on or before the date prescribed by law including extensions, for filing the taxpayer’s
federal income tax returns for the year of contributions.
Section 1.408A-5, Question and Answer-6 of the regulations, describes how a taxpayer
makes the election to recharacterize the IRA contributions. To recharacterize an amount
that has been converted from a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA: (1) the taxpayer must
notify the Roth IRA trustee of the taxpayer’s intent to recharacterize the amount, (2) the
taxpayer must provide the trustee (and the transferee trustee, if different from the
transferor trustee) with specified information that is sufficient to effect the
recharacterization, and (3) the trustee must make the transfer.
Section 1.408A-4, Q&A-2, provides, in summary, that an individual with modified
adjusted gross income in excess of $100,000 for a taxable year is not permitted to convert
an amount to a Roth IRA during that taxable year. Section 1.408A-4, Q&A-2, further
provides, in summary which is relevant to Taxpayers A and B, that an individual and his
spouse must file a joint Federal Tax Return to convert a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA,
and that the modified adjusted gross income subject to the $100,000 limit for taxable year
is the modified AGI derived from the joint return using the couple’s combined income.
Sections 301.9100-1, 301.9100-2, and 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration
Regulations, in general, provide guidance concerning requests for relief submitted to the
Service on or after December 31, 1997. Section 301.9100-1(c) of the regulations provides
that the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, in his discretion, may grant a
reasonable extension of the time fixed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, a revenue
procedure, a notice, or an announcement published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin for
4 201026041
the making of an election or application for relief in respect of tax under, among others,
Subtitle A of the Code.
Section 301.9100-2 lists certain elections for which automatic extensions of time to file
are granted. Section 301.9100-3 of the regulations generally provides guidance with
respect to the granting of relief with respect to the elections not referenced in section
301.9100-2. The relief requested in this case is not referenced in section 301.9100-2.
Section 301.9100-3 of the regulations provides that applications for relief that fall within
section 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides sufficient evidence
(including affidavits described in section 301.9100-3(e)(2)) to establish that (1) the
taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and (2) granting relief would not prejudice
the interests of the government.
Section 301.9100-3(b)(1) of the regulations provides that a taxpayer will be deemed to
have acted reasonably and in good faith (i) if its request for section 301.9100-1 relief is
filed before the failure to make a timely election is discovered by the Service; (ii) if the
taxpayer inadvertently failed to make the election because of intervening events beyond
the taxpayer’s control; (iii) if the taxpayer failed to make the election because, after
exercising reasonable diligence, the taxpayer was unaware of the necessity for the
election; (iv) the taxpayer reasonably relied upon the written advice of the Service; or (v)
the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional employed by the taxpayer,
and the tax professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make; the election.
Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(ii) of the regulations provides that ordinarily the interests of the
government will be treated as prejudiced and that ordinarily the Service will not grant
relief when the tax year that would have been affected by the election had it been timely
made are closed by the statute of limitations before the taxpayer’s receipt of a ruling
granting relief under this section.
In this case, Taxpayer A was ineligible to convert IRA X to Roth IRA Y since Taxpayers
A’s and B’s adjusted gross income exceeded $100,000. However, Taxpayer A believed
that he was eligible to convert his IRA X to Roth IRA Y until he discovered otherwise
when the Service notified him that it proposed to disallow losses shown on his tax year
2007 Federal form 1040 at which time the deadline to reconvert Roth IRA Y to a
traditional IRA had passed. Taxpayers A and B filed this request for section 301.9100
relief shortly after discovering that Taxpayer A was ineligible to convert IRA X to Roth
IRA Y. Calendar year 2007 is not a “closed” tax year under the statue of limitations.
5 201026041
With respect to your request for relief, we believe that, based on the information
submitted and the representations made, the requirements of section 301.9100-1 and
301.9100-3 of the regulations been met, and that you have acted reasonably and in good
faith with respect to making the election to recharacterize Roth IRA Y as a traditional
IRA. Specifically, the Service has concluded that you have met the requirement of
clauses (iii) and (v) of section 301.9100-3(b)(1) of the regulations. Therefore, you are
granted an extension of 60 days from the date of the issuance of this letter ruling to so
recharacterize.
No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described herein under
the provisions of any other section or either the Code or regulation which may be
applicable thereto.
This letter assumes that the above IRAs qualify under either Code section 408 or Code
section 408A (whichever is relevant) at all relevant times. It also assumes that only
amounts maintained in Roth IRA Y will be recharacterized, and that the amount
maintained in Roth IRA Y which will be recharacterized as a traditional IRA will not
exceed Amount L (the amount originally converted into Roth IRA Y).
This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this ruling letter is being
sent to your authorized representative.
If you have any questions regarding this ruling, please contact [illegible],
I.D. No. [illegible], at ([illegible]) [illegible]-[illegible] or by fax at ([illegible]) [illegible].
Sincerely yours,
[illegible]
Frances V. Sloan, Manager,
Employee Plans Technical Group 3
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.