Private Letter Ruling 1026039 Released July 2, 2010 Approved Transcribed from scan

PLR 1026039: IRS waived the 60-day rollover deadline after medical hardship

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS waived the 60-day rollover requirement for married taxpayers who missed the deadline after receiving distributions from two individual retirement annuities. The taxpayers were caring for a mentally disabled sister, whose worsening medical condition and threatened loss of state services caused substantial stress during the rollover period. The IRS granted the taxpayers 60 days from the ruling date to contribute both amounts to rollover IRAs, provided the other rollover requirements were met. The distribution checks had not been cashed and remained in the taxpayers' possession.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the IRS waive the 60-day rollover deadline when medical hardship and caregiving responsibilities prevented timely rollovers?
  • Outcome: approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 72 and 408(d)(1), 408(d)(3), and 408(d)(3)(I); Rev. Proc. 2003-16; IRC § 6110(k)(3)

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 201026039
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

Uniform Issue List: 408.03-00

SE: T: EP: RA: T2

APR 08 2010

Legend:

Taxpayer A = ***
Taxpayer B = ***
Financial Institution C = ***
IRA X = ***
IRA Y = ***
Amount A = ***
Amount B = ***
Date 1 = ***
Date 2 = ***
Year 1 = ***
State D = ***

Dear ***:

This is in response to your letter dated October 12, 2009, as supplemented by
additional correspondence dated December 16, 2009, January 9, 2010, January



Page 2
201026039

26, 2010, and March 22, 2010, submitted on your behalf by your authorized
representative, in which you request a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement
contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”).

The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of
perjury in support of the ruling requested.

Taxpayers A and B, who are married and file a joint tax return, represent that
Taxpayer A received a distribution totaling Amount A from IRA X, and that
Taxpayer B received a distribution totaling Amount B from IRA Y, both accounts
being individual retirement annuities under section 408(b) of the Code.
Taxpayers A and B assert that their failure to accomplish rollovers within the 60-
day period prescribed by section 408(d)(3) of the Code was due to Taxpayer A's
medical condition and the medical condition of Taxpayer A’s mentally disabled
sister, for whom Taxpayers are the primary caretakers and for whom Taxpayer A
is the legal guardian. Taxpayers further represent that Amounts A and B have
not been used for any other purpose.

Taxpayers A and B both held certificates of deposit in their IRAs at Financial
Institution C. When the certificates of deposit expired, they decided to move the
funds from the IRAs at Financial Institution C to IRAs at a new financial
institution in order to obtain a better rate of return. On Date 1, Taxpayer A went to
Financial Institution C and took a distribution in the form of three checks for
Amount A, the entire amount of IRA X. She also received a distribution for
Amount B, the entire amount of Taxpayer B’s IRA, IRA Y. Taxpayers have
submitted documentation indicating that, after receiving the distributions of
Amounts A and B, they researched on the internet IRAs at other financial
institutions, met with representatives of at least one bank, and planned to
conduct further research. Taxpayers represent, however, that their
responsibilities caring for Taxpayer A’s disabled sister placed them under
considerable strain during the rollover period and caused them to miss the
deadline for rolling over the IRA distributions.

Taxpayer A’s sister, in addition to her mental disability, suffers from several
physical conditions. The sister’s health worsened in Year 1, causing her to
undergo special testing during the rollover period in an attempt to bring her
physical condition under control. Taxpayers A and B also received notification
shortly before the rollover period began that State D planned to cut funding for
the sister’s services. Taxpayers represent that these events caused them
tremendous stress and affected Taxpayer A’s health. Taxpayers have provided
documentation that after the rollover period, Taxpayer A sought medical attention
for conditions relating to this stress.

Having been unable to select a new financial institution, Taxpayer A returned to
Financial Institution C on Date 2, approximately two weeks after the 60-day



Page 3
201026039

deadline, to redeposit the distribution checks. Financial Institution C informed
her that she had missed the rollover deadline. By letter dated [illegible],
Financial Institution C represents that Taxpayer A intended to deposit the checks
into an IRA and that she never cashed the checks. All of the distribution checks
remain in Taxpayers’ possession.

Based on the facts and representations, you request a ruling that the Internal
Revenue Service waive the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section
408(d)(3) of the Code with respect to the distributions of Amounts A and B.

Section 408(d)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in
section 408(d), any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA shall be included in
gross income by the payee or distributee, as the case may be, in the manner
provided under section 72 of the Code.

Section 408(d)(3) of the Code defines and provides the rules applicable to IRA
rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(1) of the Code
does not apply to any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA to the individual
for whose benefit the IRA is maintained if --

(i) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is
paid into an IRA for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th
day after the day on which the individual receives the payment or
distribution; or

(ii) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is
paid into an eligible retirement plan (other than an IRA) for the benefit of such
individual not later than the 60th day after the date on which the payment or
distribution is received, except that the maximum amount which may be paid
into such plan may not exceed the portion of the amount received which is
includible in gross income (determined without regard to section 408(d)(3)).

Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(3) does not apply
to any amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) received by an individual from
an IRA if at any time during the 1-year period ending on the day of such receipt
such individual received any other amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i)
from an IRA which was not includible in gross income because of the application
of section 408(d)(3).

Section 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code provides a similar 60-day rollover period for
partial rollovers.



Page 4
201026039

Section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code provides that the Secretary may waive the 60-
day requirement under sections 408(d)(3)(A) and 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code where
the failure to waive such requirement would be against equity or good
conscience, including casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable
control of the individual subject to such requirement. Only distributions that
occurred after December 31, 2001, are eligible for the waiver under section
408(d)(3)(I) of the Code.

Revenue Procedure 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359 (January 27, 2003) provides that
in determining whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement
pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service will consider all relevant
facts and circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution;
(2) inability to complete a rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization,
incarceration, restrictions imposed by a foreign country or postal error, (3) the
use of the amount distributed (for example, in the case of payment by check,
whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed since the distribution
occurred.

The information presented by Taxpayers A and B is consistent with their
assertion that their failure to accomplish a timely rollover was due to Taxpayer
A's medical condition and the medical condition of Taxpayer A’s mentally
disabled sister.

Therefore, pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service hereby
waives the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distributions of
Amount A from IRA X and Amount B from IRA Y. Taxpayers A and B are
granted a period of 60 days from the issuance of this ruling letter to contribute
Amounts A and B into rollover IRAs. Provided all other requirements of section
408(d)(3) of the Code, except the 60-day requirement, are met with respect to
such contributions, Amounts A and B will be considered rollover contributions
within the meaning of section 408(d)(3) of the Code.

This letter expresses no opinion as to whether the IRAs described herein
satisfied the requirements of section 408 of the Code.

No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transactions described
herein under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations
which may be applicable thereto.

This letter is directed only to the taxpayers who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter ruling
is being sent to your authorized representative.



Page 5

201026039

If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact ***. Please address all
correspondence to SE:T:EP:RA:T2.

Sincerely yours,

Donzell Littlejohn

Donzell Littlejohn, Manager,
Employee Plans Technical Group 2

Enclosures:
Deleted copy of ruling letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose

cc. ***

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.