Private Letter Ruling 1026020 Released July 2, 2010 Approved

PLR 1026020: IRS granted more time to allocate GST exemption to earlier trust transfers

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS granted a 60-day extension to allocate a decedent's available generation-skipping transfer tax exemption to transfers made to a trust in Years 1 through 6. The taxpayer's accountant had filed some gift-tax returns without making the allocations and had failed to file returns for other years. The IRS found that the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional and that the requirements for relief were satisfied. The allocations were allowed effective as of the original transfer dates, using the transfers' federal gift-tax values, and had to be reported on supplemental Forms 709.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the taxpayer receive an extension to allocate available GST exemption to earlier trust transfers after the tax professional failed to make the allocations?
  • Outcome: approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 2513, 2601, 2602, 2611, 2631, 2632, and 2642; Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3; Notice 2001-50; IRC § 6110(k)(3)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201026020 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 7/2/2010 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
Index Number: 2642.00-00, 9100.00-00 -------------------------, ID No. -------------
Telephone Number:
-------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------
---------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
------------------------ CC:PSI:B04
---------------------------- PLR-146090-09
Date:

    ----------------------------------                     March 17, 2010
    ----------------------------

Legend

Husband = -----------------------------------------
Wife = ------------------------------------------
Attorney = ---------------------
Accountant = -------------------
Trust = ------------------------------------------
Year 1 = -------
Year 2 = -------
Year 3 = -------
Year 4 = -------
Year 5 = -------
Year 6 = -------
Year 7 = -------
Date 1 = --------------------------
Date 2 = --------------------
a = -----------
b = -----------
c = -----------
d = -----------
e = -----------
f = -----------
g = -----------

Dear --------------:

    This responds to your letter dated September 17, 2009, requesting an extension

of time under § 2642(g) of the Internal Revenue Code and § 301.9100-3 of the
PLR-146090-09 2

Procedure and Administration Regulations to make an allocation of Husband’s
generation-skipping transfer (GST) exemption to transfers to Trust.

   The facts and representations submitted are summarized as follows:

   On Date 1, in Year 1, Husband established Trust for the benefit of Husband’s

descendants. Husband initially funded Trust with $a. During Year 2, Husband and his
wife, Wife, each transferred $b to Trust. During Year 3, Husband and Wife each
transferred $c to Trust. During Year 4, Husband and Wife each transferred $d to Trust.
During Year 5, Husband and Wife each transferred $e to Trust. During Year 6,
Husband and Wife each transferred $f to Trust. During Year 7, Husband and Wife each
transferred $g to Trust.

    Husband’s attorney, Attorney, advised Husband to direct Husband’s accountant

to allocate GST exemption to the transfers to Trust. Husband informed his accountant,
Accountant, about the gifts that were made to Trust in Years 1-7 and that Husband
intended those gifts to result in Trust being exempt from GST tax. Husband and Wife
consented to treat the gifts made in Years 1 - 3 as being made one-half by each
pursuant to section 2513. Accountant filed Forms 709, United States Gift (and
Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Returns, for Years 2 and 3, but failed to allocate
GST exemption on those returns. Moreover, Accountant failed to file Forms 709, for
Years 1, and 4-6.

   Husband died on Date 2. The executor of Husband’s estate and Wife represent

that no gifts were made to Trust other than during Years 1 - 7. It is represented that
GST exemption was automatically allocated for the Year 7 transfer under the deemed
allocation rules under § 2632(c).

   You have requested an extension of time under § 2642(g) and § 301.9100-3 to

allocate Husband’s and Wife’s available GST exemption to the transfers made to the
Trust in Years 1-6 based on the value of the transferred assets as of the date of the
original transfers.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

   Section 2513(a)(1) provides that a gift made by one spouse to any person other

than the donor's spouse is considered for purposes of the gift tax as made one-half by
the donor and one-half by the donor's spouse, but only if at the time of the gift each
spouse is a citizen or resident of the United States.

   Section 2513(a)(2) provides that the gift is treated as made one-half by each

spouse only if both spouses have signified (under the regulations provided for in
subsection (b)), their consent to the application of section 2513(a)(1) in the case of all
gifts made during the calendar year by either while married to each other.
PLR-146090-09 3

    Section 2513(b)(2)(A) provides that the consent under section 2513(a)(2) may be

signified at any time after the close of the calendar year in which the gift was made.
However, the consent may not be signified after the 15th of April following the close of
such year, unless before the 15th day no return has been filed for such year by either
spouse, in which case the consent may not be signified after a return for such year is
filed by either spouse.

   Section 2601 of the Internal Revenue Service imposes a tax on every

generation-skipping transfer. A generation-skipping transfer is defined under § 2611(a)
as (1) a taxable distribution, (2) a taxable termination, and (3) a direct skip.

   Section 2602 provides that the amount of the tax is the taxable amount multiplied

by the applicable rate. Section 2641(a) defines applicable rate as the product of the
maximum federal estate tax rate and the inclusion ratio with respect to the transfer.

    Section 2631(a), as in effect for the years at issue, for purposes of determining

the GST tax, provides that every individual shall be allowed a GST exemption of
$1,000,000 which may be allocated by such individual (or his executor) to any property
with respect to which such individual is the transferor. Section 2631(b) provides that
any allocation under § 2631(a), once made, shall be irrevocable. Section 2631(c), as in
effect for the tax years at issue, provided that the $1,000,000 amount under § 2631(a) is
to be adjusted for inflation for calendar years after 1998 and before 2004.

   Section 26.2632-1(b)(2) of the Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Regulations

provides that an allocation of GST exemption to property transferred during the
transferor's lifetime, other than in a direct skip, is made on Form 709.

    Section 2642(b)(1) provides that, except as provided in § 2642(f), if the allocation

of the GST exemption to any transfers of property is made on a gift tax return filed on or
before the date prescribed by § 6075(b) for such transfer or is deemed to be made
under § 2632(b)(1) or (c)(1) the value of such property for purposes of § 2642(a) shall
be its value as finally determined for purposes of chapter 12 (within the meaning of
§ 2001(f)(2)), or, in the case of an allocation deemed to have been made at the close of
an estate tax inclusion period, its value at the time of the close of the estate tax
inclusion period.

   Section 2642(g)(1)(A) provides that the Secretary shall by regulation prescribe

such circumstances and procedures under which extensions of time will be granted to
make an allocation of GST exemption described in § 2642(b)(1) or (2), and an election
under § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5). Such regulations shall include procedures for requesting
comparable relief with respect to transfers made before the date of the enactment of
this paragraph.
PLR-146090-09 4

   Section 2642(g)(1)(B) provides that in determining whether to grant relief under

this paragraph, the Secretary shall take into account all relevant circumstances,
including evidence of intent contained in the trust instrument or instrument of transfer
and such other factors as the Secretary deems relevant. For purposes of determining
whether to grant relief under this paragraph, the time for making the allocation (or
election) shall be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute. See Notice 2001-50,
2001-2 C.B. 189.

   Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards used to determine whether to grant

an extension of time to make an election whose date is prescribed by a regulation (and
not expressly provided by statute). In accordance with § 2642(g)(1)(B) and Notice
2001-50, taxpayers may seek an extension of time to make an allocation described in
§ 2642(b)(1) or (b)(2) or an election described in § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5) under the
provisions of § 301.9100-3.

   Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer

provides the evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the
taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice
the interests of the government.

  Section 301.9100-3(b)(1)(v) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted

reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax
professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax
professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

    Based on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that

the requirements of § 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Therefore, Husband is granted
an extension of time of 60 days from the date of this letter to make an allocation of his
available GST exemption, with respect to the transfers to Trust in Years 1-6. The
allocation will be effective as of the respective date of the transfer to Trust and the value
of the transfer to Trust as determined for federal gift tax purposes will be used in
determining the amount of Husband’s exemption to be allocated to Trust.

   These allocations should be made on supplemental Forms 709 for Years 1-6.

The Forms 709 should be filed with the Cincinnati Service Center at the following
address: Internal Revenue Service, Cincinnati Service Center - Stop 82, Cincinnati, OH
45999. A copy of this letter should be attached to the supplemental Forms 709. A copy
is enclosed for this purpose.

     In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this

letter is being sent to your authorized representatives.
PLR-146090-09 5

   Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied

concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this letter.

  The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and

representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury
statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the
material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on
examination.

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)

provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

                                     Sincerely,

                                     Associate Chief Counsel
                                     Passthroughs and Special Industries


                              By:    _________________________
                                     Leslie H. Finlow
                                     Acting Senior Technician Reviewer
                                     Branch 4
                                     Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                     (Passthroughs and Special Industries)


  Enclosures
        Copy for § 6110 purposes
        Copy of this letter

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.