PLR 1026008: IRS kept prior transaction rulings in force after proposed revisions
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The IRS issued a supplemental ruling on a previously approved corporate transaction involving the planned sale of stock in a new corporation and an initial public offering. The taxpayer revised several transaction steps to eliminate a proposed preferred-stock issuance if an investor sale closed. The IRS ruled that the supplemental facts and revisions would not affect the rulings in the prior letter, so those rulings remained in full force and effect. The IRS did not rule on the consequences of section 338 elections or on whether a new corporate note would qualify as debt for federal tax purposes.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Would revised steps in a previously ruled-on corporate transaction change the conclusions in the prior letter ruling?
- Outcome: approved
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 318, 338(g), 338(h)(10), and 6110(k)(3)
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201026008 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 7/2/2010 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
Index Number: 338.00-00 ----------------------, ID No. -------------
Telephone Number:
---------------------
---------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
------------------ CC:CORP:B05
----------------------- PLR-109798-10
----------------------------- Date:
March 25, 2010
Legend
Date A = -----------------------
The Investor = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
q = ------
r = -----------------
s = -----
t = --
u = -----------------
v = ----
w = -----------------
Dear --------------:
We respond to your letter dated February 16, 2010, requesting a supplemental
ruling with respect to our prior letter ruling dated January 4, 2010 (PLR-146103-09) (the
“Prior Letter Ruling”). The information provided in that letter and in later
correspondence is summarized below. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this
letter retain the meanings originally assigned to them in the Prior Letter Ruling.
PLR-109798-10 2
This letter supplements the Prior Letter Ruling with regard to the proposed
transaction described therein (the “Proposed Transaction”).
SUPPLEMENTAL FACTS
As described in the Prior Letter Ruling, Parent intends to undertake the Proposed
Transaction to reduce its investment in Industry B.
On date A, Seller entered into a binding agreement (the "Purchase Agreement")
with the Investor pursuant to which the Investor will purchase from Seller shares of
Newco common stock representing up to q percent of the fully diluted equity interest in
Newco (the "Purchased Shares") and a warrant (the “Warrant”, and collectively with the
Purchased Shares, the "Securities") to acquire from Newco additional shares of Newco
common stock (the "Investor Sale"). The aggregate purchase price for the Securities is
capped at $r. The Warrant will have an exercise price equal to s percent (greater than
100 percent) of the price per share paid by public investors in the initial public offering
("IPO") of Newco common stock (the "Public Offering Price"), and a term of t years. In
addition to the Securities, the Investor has the right to purchase from Seller up to $u of
shares of Newco common stock at a per share price equal to the Public Offering Price.
The closing of the sale of this Newco common stock and the Securities to the Investor
(the “Closing”) will occur within v business days of the date on which the parties enter
into the firm commitment underwriting agreement described in Step 2 of the Proposed
Transaction, as described herein and in the Prior Letter Ruling (the “Underwriting
Agreement”).
The Purchased Shares, combined with the Newco common stock sold to third-
party underwriters pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement, will represent more than 20
percent of the outstanding Newco common stock immediately following the Transfers.
REVISIONS TO THE PROPOSED TRANSACTION
Parent would like to eliminate the issuance and sale of the Newco Preferred
Stock from the Proposed Transaction unless the Investor Sale fails to close.
Accordingly, assuming that the Investor Sale is consummated as described above,
Steps 2, 6 and 7 of the Proposed Transaction will be revised to read as follows:
(2) Several months later, Seller entered into the Purchase Agreement to sell
to the Investor the Securities that Seller will receive in exchange for
property, as described in Step 6. Such sale will occur pursuant to Step 7.
Investor will not transfer any money or other property to Newco in
connection with the Proposed Transaction (apart from any potential future
exercise of the Warrant). Seller will also enter into the Underwriting
Agreement pursuant to which it will be obligated to sell Newco common
stock in the IPO, as described in Step 7. In the aggregate, the Newco
PLR-109798-10 3
common stock sold to the Investor pursuant to the Purchase Agreement
and the Newco common stock sold to third-party underwriters will
represent more than 20 percent of the total outstanding Newco common
stock immediately following the Transfers. An affiliate of Parent may act
as one of several underwriters in the IPO, and for any Additional
Dispositions.
(6) Seller will transfer to Newco all of its equity in the Purchased Subsidiaries
(which includes the stock of Target 1 and Target Sub 1A) together with the
Additional Transferred Assets in exchange for 100 percent of the Newco
common stock, the Warrant and a Newco note with a face amount of at
least $w (the “Newco Note”). Seller, Newco and certain other Parent
affiliates will enter into a tax sharing agreement and other transitional and
service agreements as part of the Proposed Transaction.
(7) Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement and the Underwriting Agreement
executed in Step 2, Seller will sell in exchange for cash: (i) more than 20
percent of Newco’s common stock to the Investor and third-party
underwriters, (ii) the Warrant to the Investor, and (iii) an additional amount
of Newco common stock to an underwriter that is an affiliate of Parent.
The stock will be sold to the underwriters for resale to the public. The IPO
will be implemented within several business days of the completion of
Step 6. Seller and the Investor will enter into a lock-up agreement
pursuant to which they will not be allowed to dispose of any Newco
common stock for a period of 180 days following the IPO.
If the Investor Sale is not consummated as described above, Steps 2, 6 and 7 of
the Proposed Transaction will remain as described in the Prior Letter Ruling.
SUPPLEMENTAL REPRESENTATIONS
In connection with its request for a supplemental ruling, Parent has reaffirmed all
of the representations contained in the Prior Letter Ruling, as modified below:
h. The terms of the Underwriting Agreement will be, and the terms of the
Purchase Agreement were, determined pursuant to arm's-length negotiations
with the underwriters and the Investor, respectively.
l. The Newco Note will constitute the indebtedness of Newco for federal tax
purposes, will have a face amount of at least $w, and will have terms that will
have been negotiated at arms-length. The Newco Note will not confer any
voting rights in Newco.
m. The sales of Newco common stock described in clause (i) of Step 7 will not
be to parties whose ownership of Newco would be attributed to Seller
PLR-109798-10 4
pursuant to section 318. In measuring attributed ownership under section
318, there shall be taken into account all events occurring or contemplated
during the period beginning with Step 6 and ending with the completion of
Step 9 of the Proposed Transaction.
SUPPLEMENTAL RULING
Based solely on the information submitted and the representations made herein
and submitted with the Prior Letter Ruling, we rule as follows:
The supplemental facts submitted and the revisions to the Proposed Transaction
described above will have no effect on the rulings contained in the Prior Letter
Ruling. Accordingly, those rulings will remain in full force and effect.
CAVEATS
Except as expressly ruled herein, no opinion is expressed regarding the
consequences resulting from the section 338(g) or section 338(h)(10) elections, or
whether the Newco Note will constitute the indebtedness of Newco for federal tax
purposes. Moreover, no opinion is expressed concerning the tax treatment of the
Proposed Transaction or of any other matter under other provisions of the Code and
regulations, or about the tax treatment of any aspect of or effect resulting from the
Proposed Transaction not specifically covered by the above rulings.
Furthermore, the effectiveness of this ruling is conditioned upon Parent, Seller,
Newco, the Purchased Subsidiaries, and the Indirectly Purchased Subsidiaries
agreeing, if requested, to an extension of their respective statutes of limitations with
respect to any issues raised by this letter ruling provided the extension is for a period
acceptable to the Service.
PROCEDURAL STATEMENTS
The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and
representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalties of perjury
statement executed by the appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the
material submitted in support of the request for rulings. Verification of the information,
representations, and other data may be required as part of the audit process.
This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that this letter may not be used or cited as precedent.
A copy of this letter must be attached to the federal income tax return of each
taxpayer involved in each taxable year in which the transaction is consummated.
Alternatively, a taxpayer filing its return electronically may satisfy this requirement by
PLR-109798-10 5
attaching to the return a statement that provides the date and control number of this
ruling letter.
Pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office, we have sent a copy of this
letter to your authorized representatives.
Sincerely,
_Debra L. Carlisle______
Debra L. Carlisle
Chief, Branch 5
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Corporate)
cc:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.