PLR 201026006: IRS upheld an S corporation election after a void stock transfer

Number
201026006
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Termination of Election
Code sections
§ 1361, § 1362, § 6110
Ruling dated
January 22, 2010
Publicly released
July 2, 2010

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS concluded that a corporation's S corporation election did not terminate when a shareholder attempted to transfer stock to an ineligible shareholder. A court had determined that the transfer was void from the beginning under state law, so the recipient was never a shareholder and the original shareholder remained the legal owner. The corporation and its shareholders were required to treat the corporation as continuously holding S corporation status, amend inconsistent returns, and file the amended returns within 60 days of the ruling. The IRS did not rule on whether the corporation otherwise qualified as a small business corporation under IRC § 1361(b).

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Did an attempted transfer of stock to an ineligible shareholder terminate the corporation's S corporation election when a court later declared the transfer void?
  • Outcome: approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361 and 1362; IRC § 6110(k)(3)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201026006
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 7/2/2010
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
Index Number: 1362.02-00
------------------, ID No. -------------
Telephone Number:
--------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
----------------------------
CC:PSI:B02
------------------------
PLR-101803-10
-------------------
Date:
-----------------------------
January 22, 2010

LEGEND

X = --------------------------
----------------------

A = ----------------------------------

B = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------

State = -------------

Court = ---------------------------------------------------------------

D1 = ---------------------------

D2 = ---------------------

D3 = --------------------------

Dear ---------------------------:

This responds to a letter dated January 8, 2010 submitted on behalf of X by its authorized representative, requesting a ruling that X's subchapter S election did not terminate on D2.

The information submitted states that X was incorporated in State on D1. X made an election to be treated as an S corporation effective D1. As part of X’s formation, X’s founding shareholders, which included A, executed a Shareholders’ Agreement. Under this agreement, a shareholder desiring to transfer shares of X must (i) obtain the
PLR-101803-10
2

consent of the other shareholders prior to transfer, (ii) the transferee must become a party to the agreement, and (iii) no transfer is allowed if the transfer would result in the termination of X’s S corporation status.

On D2, A attempted to transfer a portion of his shares in X to B, which is not an eligible S corporation shareholder. On D3, Court entered an order holding that the attempted transfer of A's shares in X to B was null and void and that A remained the record and legal owner of all of the shares A attempted to transfer to B.

Section 1362(a) of the Internal Revenue Code provides that, except as provided in
§ 1362(g), a small business corporation may elect, in accordance with the provisions of
§ 1362, to be an S corporation.

Section 1361(a)(1) provides that the term "S corporation" means, with respect to any taxable year, a small business corporation for which an election under § 1362(a) is in effect for such year.

Sections 1362(d)(2)(A) provides that an S election terminates whenever (at any time on or after the 1st day of the 1st taxable year for which the corporation is an S corporation) such corporation ceases to be a small business corporation.

Based solely on the facts and representations submitted, because A's transfer of X shares to B was void ab initio under State law as determined by Court, we conclude that X's S corporation election did not terminate on D2. Accordingly, as B was never a shareholder of X, X will be treated as continuing to be an S corporation from D2, and thereafter, provided X's S corporation election was valid, and has not otherwise terminated under the provisions of § 1362(d).

X and all its current and prior shareholders must treat X as having been an S corporation for the period from D2 to the present. In addition, X and its shareholders must treat A as having been the shareholder of the X shares which A attempted to transfer to B and amend any prior tax returns that are inconsistent with this treatment. Any amended returns required under this paragraph must be filed within 60 days of the date of this ruling or it will be null and void. A copy of this letter must be attached to any such returns.

Except as specifically set forth above, no opinion is expressed concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provision of the Code, including whether X was or is a small business corporation under § 1361(b) of the Code.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-101803-10
3

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file, a copy of this letter is being sent to X's authorized representatives.

Sincerely,

Bradford R. Poston
Senior Counsel, Branch 2
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2):
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace