Private Letter Ruling 1026002 Released July 2, 2010 Approved

PLR 1026002: IRS granted late-election relief for rental real estate activities

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS granted a married couple an additional 60 days to elect to treat all of their rental real estate interests as one rental real estate activity. The taxpayers were eligible to make the election but inadvertently filed their joint return without the required statement. The election had to be made on the required statement and attached to an amended return for the applicable year, with a copy of the ruling attached. The IRS did not rule on whether the taxpayers met the real-property-business or material-participation requirements.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could taxpayers make a late election to treat all their rental real estate interests as one activity?
  • Outcome: approved
  • Key authorities: IRC § 469(c)(7); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.469-9(g)(3) and 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3; IRC § 6110(k)(3)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201026002 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 7/2/2010 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
Index Number: 469.03-03, 9100.00-00 ---------------------------, ID No. -------------
Telephone Number:
---------------------
----------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
-------------------------- CC:PSI:B01
------------------------- PLR-101169-10
Date:
March 25, 2010

LEGEND:

Taxpayers = ---------------------



                                 -------------------------

Year 1 = -------

Dear -----------------:

    This responds to a letter dated -------------------------, and subsequent

correspondence, submitted on behalf of Taxpayers by your authorized representative,
requesting an extension of time under § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and
Administration Regulations for Taxpayers to file an election under § 469(c)(7) of the
Internal Revenue Code and § 1.469-9(g)(3) of the Income Tax Regulations to treat all
interests in rental real estate as a single rental real estate activity.

Facts

     According to the information submitted, Taxpayers were married individuals who

filed their tax returns jointly. Taxpayers represent that in Year 1 they were in a real
property business as defined by § 469 and were qualified under § 469(c)(7)(B) to make
PLR-101169-10 2

an election to treat all interests in rental real estate as a single rental real estate activity.
However, Taxpayers inadvertently filed their joint return for Year 1 without the statement
required under § 1.469-9(g)(3).

Law and Analysis

     Under § 469(c)(2), the term “passive activity” generally includes any rental

activity. Section 469(c)(7) provides a limited exception to this rule for taxpayers in a real
property trade or business. Specifically, § 469(c)(7)(A) indicates that if a taxpayer
meets the requirements of section 469(c)(7)(B), the taxpayer's rental real estate activity
will no longer be presumptively passive. By its terms, the exception under
§ 469(c)(7)(A) is to be applied as if each interest of the taxpayer in rental real estate
were a separate activity. However, a taxpayer may elect to treat all interests in rental real
estate as a single activity.

    Section 1.469-9(g)(3) provides that a qualifying taxpayer makes the election to

treat all interests in rental real estate as a single rental real estate activity by filing a
statement with the taxpayer's original income tax return for the taxable year. Section
1.469-9(g)(3) describes the information that must be contained in the statement.

   Under § 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner may grant a reasonable extension of

time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than 6 months
except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal
Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I. Section 301.9100-1(b) defines the term
“regulatory election” as including an election whose due date is prescribed by a
regulation published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.

   Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the

Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an
election.

   Section 301.9100-2 provides the rules governing automatic extensions of time for

making certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards the Commissioner
will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time for regulatory elections that
do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.

    Section 301.9100-3 provides that requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be

granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the grant
of relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

   Section 301.9100-3(b) provides that subject to paragraphs (b)(3)(i) through (iii) of

PLR-101169-10 3

§ 301.9100-3, when a taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional,
including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax professional failed to
make, or advise the taxpayer to make the election, the taxpayer will be deemed to have
acted reasonably and in good faith.

Conclusion

   Based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, we

conclude that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied.
As a result, Taxpayers are granted an extension of time of 60 days from the date of this
letter to make an election under § 469(c)(7)(A) to treat all their interests in rental real
estate as a single rental real estate activity effective Year 1. The election must be in the
form of the statement required by § 1.469-9(g)(3) and attached to an amended return
for Year 1. A copy of this letter should be attached to the election. A copy is enclosed
for that purpose.

    Except as specifically set forth above, no opinion is expressed concerning the

federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provision of the
Code. Specifically, no opinion is expressed concerning whether Taxpayers satisfy the
requirements under § 469(c)(7)(B) or whether Taxpayers materially participated in any
activity.

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayers requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of

the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

     In accordance with the power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this

letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

                                 Sincerely,

                                 Associate Chief Counsel
                                 (Passthroughs & Special Industries)

                                       /s/

                           By:
                                 David R. Haglund
                                 Chief, Branch 1
                                 Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                 (Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2):
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.