PLR 1025020: IRS allowed a late mark-to-market election for PFIC stock
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The IRS granted a common trust fund 60 days to make late mark-to-market elections for stock in four passive foreign investment companies (PFICs). The fund's prior return did not include the required Forms 8621 because its tax preparer mistakenly believed the PFICs, rather than the fund, had to make the elections. The fund represented that its returns and participant schedules had been prepared as if the elections were timely made. The IRS concluded that the fund acted reasonably and in good faith and that relief would not prejudice the Government.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could the common trust fund make late section 1296 mark-to-market elections for its PFIC stock?
- Outcome: Approved
- Key authorities: IRC § 1296; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1296-1 and 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201025020 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 6/25/2010 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.22-00, 1296.00-00
Person To Contact:
------------------------------------- --------------------------, ID No. ------------
------------------------------------------------------ Telephone Number:
---------------------------------- --------------------
------------------- Refer Reply To:
---------------------------------------------- CC:INTL:B02
PLR-138080-09
Date:
February 22, 2010
TY: -------
Legend
Fund = ------------------------------------------------------
----------------------
Former Name = -----------------------------------------
Trustee = -----------------------------
PFIC 1 = ----------------------------------------
PFIC 2 = -----------------------
PFIC 3 = ----------------------
PFIC 4 = ---------------
Location A = ---------------
Location B = ---------
Location C = --------
Date 1 = -----------------
Date 2 = --------------------------
Date 3 = ---------------------
Year X = -------
Year Y = -------
Accounting Firm = ----------------------------------------
Dear -------------------:
This is in response to a letter received by our office on September 24, 2009,
submitted on behalf of Fund by its authorized representative, requesting an extension of
time under §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration
PLR-138080-09 2
Regulations to make a mark to market election under section 1296 of the Internal
Revenue Code (“Code”).
The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in
support of the request for a ruling. Verification of the factual information,
representations, and other data submitted may be required as part of the audit process.
FACTS
Fund is a common trust fund as described in section 584. Fund was established
on Date 1 under an Agreement and Declaration of Trust. On Date 3, the name of Fund
was changed from Former Name to Fund.
Fund was established with the primary objective of providing total return through
investment in a diversified portfolio of equity securities that primarily contain foreign
stock. As a result, Fund normally invests a significant portion of its net assets in equity
securities of foreign entities. Fund represents that it was always Fund’s intent to make
an election to mark to market the stock of each passive foreign investment company
(“PFIC”) held by Fund, pursuant to Treas. Reg. § 1.1296-1(h)(1).
For the taxable year ended on Date 2 (Year X), Fund held stock in PFIC 1 and
PFIC 2, both of which are organized under the laws of Location A; in PFIC 3, which is
organized under the laws of Location B; and in PFIC 4, which is organized under the
laws of Location C (PFICs 1, 2, 3, and 4 are collectively referred to as the “PFICs”).
Each of these entities is a passive foreign investment company within the meaning of
section 1297(a).
Trustee is trustee of Fund and provides administrative services for Fund. For the
Year X taxable year, these administrative services included the preparation of Fund’s
Form 1041. For the Year Y taxable year, Accounting Firm was engaged to prepare
Fund’s federal income tax return and, as part of its review prior to preparing Fund’s
Year Y Form 1041, requested a copy of Fund’s Year X Form 1041. Upon inspection of
Fund’s Year X Form 1041, Accounting Firm noted that, notwithstanding the fact that
Fund held stock in four PFICs within the meaning of section 1297(a), the Year X income
tax return did not include any Forms 8621 (Return by a Shareholder of a Passive
Foreign Investment Company or Qualified Electing Fund). Accounting Firm requested
clarification from Fund and Trustee regarding the missing Forms 8621.
According to an affidavit from the vice president and accountant for Trustee who
prepared Fund’s Year X tax return, she erroneously assumed that the PFICs
themselves were required to file a Form 8621 to make a mark to market election under
section 1296, rather than Fund. As a result, no Forms 8621 were prepared with respect
PLR-138080-09 3
to Fund’s investments in the PFICs and the elections under Treas. Reg. § 1.1296-1(h)
to mark to market the stock of the PFICs were not timely filed.
However, Fund represents that its federal income tax returns have been filed as
if the mark to market elections were timely made, and the schedules provided to
participants depicting their proportionate share of Fund’s taxable income or loss and
gain or loss have been consistent with the elections having been made.
Fund has made the following additional representations with respect to each
election:
1. The request for relief was filed by Fund before the failure to make the
regulatory election was discovered by the IRS.
2. Granting the relief will not result in Fund being placed in a better tax
position than if the election had been made on a timely basis.
3. Fund is not seeking to alter a return position for which an accuracy-
related penalty has been or could have been imposed under section
6662 of the Code, nor is Fund using hindsight to the Government’s
prejudice in requesting this ruling after the due date for the election.
4. No facts have occurred subsequent to the due date of the election that
now make it more advantageous for Fund to make the election.
5. It always was, and continues to be, the intent of Fund to make a
section 1296 election with respect to the stock of each of the PFICs.
LAW
Section 1296(a) provides that, in the case of marketable stock in a passive
foreign investment company that is owned by a United States person at the close of any
taxable year, the person may elect to include in gross income the excess of the fair
market value of the stock over its adjusted basis.
Treas. Reg. § 1.1296-1(h) provides that an election under section 1296 for a
taxable year must be made on or before the due date (including extensions) of the
person’s U.S. income tax return for that year.
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has the discretion
to grant a taxpayer a reasonable extension of time, under the rules set forth in Treas.
Reg. § 301.9100-3, to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Code, except
subtitles E, G, H, and I.
PLR-138080-09 4
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(b) provides that an election includes an application for
relief in respect of tax, and defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date
is prescribed by a regulation, revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or
announcement.
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief will be granted
when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in Treas. Reg.
§301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer
acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests
of the Government.
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(b)(1) provides that, except as provided in Treas. Reg.
§ 301.9100-3(b)(3), a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith if
the taxpayer
(i) requests relief before the failure to make the regulatory election is
discovered by the IRS;
(ii) failed to make the election because of intervening events beyond the
taxpayer’s control;
(iii) failed to make the election because, after exercising reasonable diligence
(taking into account the taxpayer’s experience and the complexity of the
return or issue), the taxpayer was unaware of the necessity for the
election;
(iv) reasonably relied on the written advice of the IRS; or
(v) reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, including a tax
professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax professional failed to
make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(b)(3) provides that a taxpayer is deemed not to have
acted reasonably or in good faith if the taxpayer
(i) seeks to alter a return position for which an accuracy-related penalty has
been or could be imposed under section 6662 at the time the taxpayer
requests relief (taking into account any qualified amended return filed
within the meaning of Treas. Reg. § 1.6664-2(c)(3)) and the new position
requires or permits a regulatory election for which relief is requested;
(ii) was informed in all material respects of the required election and related
tax consequences but chose not to file the election; or
(iii) uses hindsight in requesting relief.
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(c)(1)(i) provides, in part, that the interests of the
Government are prejudiced if granting relief would result in the taxpayer having a lower
tax liability in the aggregate for all taxable years affected by the election than the
taxpayer would have had if the election had been timely made (taking into account the
PLR-138080-09 5
time value of money). Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(c)(1)(ii) provides, in part, that the
interests of the Government are ordinarily prejudiced if the taxable year in which the
regulatory election should have been made is closed, or any taxable years that would
have been affected by the election had it been timely made are closed, by the period of
limitations on assessment under section 6501(a) before the taxpayer’s receipt of a
ruling granting relief.
CONCLUSION
Based on the information and representations submitted, we conclude that Fund
satisfies the requirements for a reasonable extension of time to make the mark to
market election under section 1296 of the Code. Accordingly, Fund is granted an
extension of time of 60 days from the date of this letter to make the election under
section 1296, with respect to the stock of each of the PFICs, for Fund’s taxable year
ending on Date 2.
The granting of an extension of time is not a determination that Fund is otherwise
eligible to make the election under section 1296. Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(a).
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, copies of this
letter are being sent to Fund’s representatives.
Sincerely,
Jeffery G. Mitchell
Special Counsel
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(International)
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.