Private Letter Ruling 1025002 Released June 25, 2010 Approved

PLR 1025002: IRS treated a corporation as an S corporation after an ineffective election

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS ruled that a corporation could be treated as an S corporation even though its original election was ineffective because a shareholder had not provided the required consent. The corporation and shareholder agreed to make any adjustments required by the Secretary. The IRS determined that the ineffective election was inadvertent and allowed S corporation treatment from the requested effective date, provided the election was otherwise valid and not terminated. The corporation had to file the shareholder's signed consent with the original Form 2553 within 60 days, or the ruling would be void.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the corporation receive relief for an ineffective S corporation election caused by missing shareholder consent?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC § 1361(a)(1); IRC § 1362(a)(2), (f)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201025002 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 6/25/2010 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.01-01
Person To Contact:
------------------------------------- ---------------------------, ID No. ------------
--------------------------------- Telephone Number:
----------------------------- --------------------
-------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B01
PLR-101318-10
Date:
March 18, 2010

LEGEND

X = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

a = -----------------------

D1 = ---------------------

Dear -------------:

   This responds to a letter dated ---------------------, and subsequent

correspondence, submitted on behalf of X, requesting a ruling under § 1362(f) of the
Internal Revenue Code.

Facts

    According to the information submitted, X was incorporated on D1. X attempted

to elect to be treated as an S corporation effective D1. However, the required consent
to X’s S corporation election was not obtained from shareholder a. As a result, the
election was ineffective. X seeks a ruling that X will be treated as an S corporation
effective D1.

   X and its shareholder agree to make any adjustments required by the Secretary

consistent with the treatment of X as an S corporation.

Law and Analysis
PLR-101318-10 2

    Section 1361(a)(1) provides that the term “S corporation” means, with respect to

any taxable year, a small business corporation for which an election under § 1362(a) is
in effect for such year.

  Section 1362(a)(2) provides that such an election shall be valid only if all persons

who are shareholders in such corporation on the day on which such election is made
consent to such election.

    Section 1362(f) provides that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any

corporation (A) was not effective for the taxable year for which it was made (determined
without regard to § 1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the requirements of
§ 1361(b) or to obtain shareholder consents, or (B) was terminated under § 1362(d)(2)
or (3), (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in such
ineffectiveness or termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of
time after discovery of the event resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination, steps
were taken (A) so that the corporation is a small business corporation, or (B) to acquire
the required shareholder consents, and (4) the corporation, and each person who was a
shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to
§ 1362(f), agrees to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the
corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to
such period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in such ineffectiveness
or termination, the corporation shall be treated as an S corporation during the period
specified by the Secretary.

Conclusion

    Based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, we

conclude that X's election to be treated as an S corporation was ineffective due to the
failure of a to consent to the election. We also conclude that the ineffective election
constitutes an “inadvertent ineffective election” within the meaning of § 1362(f).
Therefore, X will be treated as an S corporation from D1, provided that X's S corporation
election is otherwise valid and is not otherwise terminated under § 1362(d).

   As a condition of this ruling, a consent to the S election signed by a must be filed

with the appropriate service center, indicating that the consent is to be associated with
the originally filed Form 2553, within 60 days of this letter.

   A copy of this letter should be attached to the consent. This letter ruling will be

null and void if these conditions are not satisfied.

   Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied

concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this letter. In particular, no opinion is expressed as to whether X is an S
corporation for federal tax purposes.
PLR-101318-10 3

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)

provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

  Pursuant to the power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter will

be sent to X's authorized representative.

                                       Sincerely,

                                          /s/


                                       David R. Haglund
                                       Chief, Branch 1
                                       Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                       (Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)

Copy of this letter
Copy of this letter for § 6110 purposes

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.