CCA 201024062: Counsel advised against using Munro computations in a TEFRA scenario

Number
201024062
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Definitions and Special Rules
Code sections
§ 6231, § 6110
Ruling dated
May 14, 2010
Publicly released
June 18, 2010

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The Office of Chief Counsel considered how to calculate a deficiency when a taxpayer reported a loss, a non-TEFRA adjustment created net income, and a TEFRA partnership proceeding was still pending. Counsel concluded that the IRS should not use the Munro computations under the described scenario. The memo explains that disregarding the partnership income could produce only a de minimis deficiency while affecting the IRS's ability to assess the non-TEFRA income later.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Should the IRS use the Munro computations when a TEFRA proceeding and a non-TEFRA adjustment overlap?
  • Outcome: Advice given
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6231; TEFRA partnership procedures

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2010051408592137 Number: 201024062
Release Date: 6/18/2010
Office: --------
UILC: 6231.00-00

From: --------------------
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 9:00:04 AM
To:
Cc:
Subject: RE: Possible munro situation

If the taxpayer reported a $ loss, and we have a $ + non-TEFRA adjustment we would determine a deficiency on approximately $ of net income.

If we if ignore the net income from the partnership (also about $ ), the starting "reported amount" would be a negative $ . This would result in a de minimus deficiency. When the TEFRA proceeding is over, we will likely only be able to asses additional partnership income and we will have forgone our ability to assess a deficiency on the $ of net non-TEFRA income.

So I agree that we should not use the Munro computations under this scenario.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace