Chief Counsel Advice 1024059 Released June 18, 2010 Advice

CCA 1024059: Inadequate gift-tax disclosure can leave the assessment period open indefinitely

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The Office of Chief Counsel advised that IRC § 6501(c)(9) can leave gift tax assessable at any time when a donor fails to adequately disclose a gift on the gift tax return. Adequate disclosure generally requires a description of the property, the identities and relationship of the transferor and transferees, and detailed valuation information, including discounts. The memo states that a donor of closely held stock who omitted the valuation method and discounts likely failed to start the assessment limitations period. It also discusses appraisal-based disclosure and the special rules for transfers subject to IRC §§ 2701 and 2702.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Does omitting material valuation information from a gift tax return prevent the assessment limitations period from starting?
  • Outcome: Advice given
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6501(c)(9); Treas. Reg. §§ 25.2701-4 and 301.6501(c)-1(e), (f); Rev. Proc. 2000-34

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2010051118082244 Number: 201024059
Release Date: 6/18/2010
Office: ----------------------------
UILC: 6501.04-00

From: ----------------------
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 6:08:24 PM
To: --------------------
Cc:
Subject: 6501(c)(9) Question


The discussion below answers your question.

Section 6501(c)(9) provides an exception to the general 3-year assessment limitations
period. Under section 6501(c)(9), if the value of gifted property is required to be shown
on a gift tax return (return of tax imposed by chapter 12 of subtitle B of the Internal
Revenue Code) but is not shown on the return, then any gift tax on the transfer of gifted
property may be assessed at any time. The unlimited assessment period does not
apply if the gift was disclosed on the return in a “manner adequate to apprise the
Secretary of the nature of such item.”

The Treasury regulations promulgated under section 6501(c)(9) provide that if a gift is
not “adequately disclosed” on a gift tax return, then the tax imposed on that gift may be
assessed at any time. Treas. Reg. § 301.6501(c)-1(f). A gift will be adequately disclosed if the gift tax return provides, inter alia, the following
information:

         1. A description of the transferred property;
         2. The identity of, and relationship between, the transferor and each
            transferee;
         3. A detailed description of the method used to determine the fair market
            value of the property transferred, including any financial data used in
            determining the value of the interest, any restrictions on the transferred
            property considered in determining the fair market value of the property,
            and a description of any discounts claimed in valuing the property. In the
            case of a transfer of an interest in an entity that is not actively traded, a
            description must be provided of any discount claimed in valuing the
            interest in the entity or any assets owned by such entity. Treas. Reg. §
            301.6501(c)-1(f)(iv).

The adequate disclosure requirements may also be met if the donor submits an
appraisal of the transferred property that meets the requirements set forth in §
301.6501(c)-1(f)(3).

The period of limitations on assessment of gift tax with respect to a gift will commence
to run only if the donor submits information required under the regulations. Rev. Proc.
2000-34, 2000-2 C.B. 186.

You indicated that a donor of stock of a closely-held business failed to disclose on the
gift tax return: (1) any information with respect to the method used to determine the
FMV of the stock; and (2) any description of discounts used to value the stock when
discounts were in fact used to value the stock. Based on these basic facts, it appears
that the gift tax imposed on the stock transfer may be assessed at any time under
section 6501(c)(9).

Please note that gifts subject to the special valuation rules in sections 2701 or 2702, or
any taxable event described in § 25.2701-4, must be “adequately shown” on the gift tax
return under § 301.6501(c)-1(e) for the period of limitations on assessment to begin to
run. While the “adequately shown” standard in § 301.6501(c)-1(e) may differ somewhat
from the adequate disclosure standard of § 301.6501(c)-1(f), the § 301.6501(c)-1(e)
regulations imposes similar disclosure requirements with respect to the particular
method the donor used for gift valuation purposes. § 301.6501(c)-1(e) provides that the
gift tax return to provide a “detailed description (including all actuarial factors and
discount rates used) of the method used to determine the amount of the gift arising from
the transfer (or taxable event), including, in the case of an equity interest that is not
actively traded, the financial and other data used in determining value. Financial data
should generally include balance sheets and statements of net earnings, operating
results, and dividends paid for each of the 5 years immediately before the valuation
date.”

If you need additional assistance, please feel free to contact me.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.