Private Letter Ruling 1023049 Released June 11, 2010 Approved

Taxpayer granted more time to elect Canadian RRSP tax deferral

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS granted a taxpayer an extension of time to elect treaty-based deferral of U.S. tax on income accrued in a Canadian Registered Retirement Savings Plan. The taxpayer had become a U.S. resident, made the election for a later year, and then discovered that the election had not been made for an earlier year. The IRS found that the taxpayer satisfied the standards for relief under the regulations, including reasonable conduct, good faith, and lack of prejudice to the government. The taxpayer received 60 days from the ruling date to make the election for the specified tax years.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the taxpayer receive additional time to elect the Rev. Proc. 2002-23 treatment for a Canadian RRSP?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3; Rev. Proc. 2002-23; Article XVIII of the United States-Canada income tax treaty

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201023049 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 6/11/2010 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.22-00, 9114.03-06
Person To Contact:
------------------- --------------------
ID No. -------------
--------------------------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------------------- ---------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:INTL
PLR-142564-09
Date: March 12, 2010

A = ----------------------

Tax Years = ---------------

Year 1 = -------

Year 2 = ---------

Year 3 = -------

Year 4 = -------

Dear:

This is in reply to a letter dated September 17, 2009, requesting an extension of time
under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 for A to elect the provisions of Rev. Proc. 2002-23,
2002-1 C.B. 744 for Tax Years. The information submitted for consideration is
substantially as set forth below.

The ruling contained in this letter is predicated upon facts and representations
submitted by A and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an
appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of
the request for a ruling. Verification of the factual information, representations, and
other data may be required as a part of the audit process.

A is a U.S. resident who established a Canadian Registered Retirement Savings Plan
(RRSP) in Year 1. A became a U.S. resident in Year 2. A filed a Form 8891 for Year 3
on which he made an election for Year 3 and subsequent years, pursuant to paragraph
7 of Article XVIII of the Treaty, 1 to defer U.S. tax on income accrued in his RRSP. A
was not aware, nor was he advised by his previous tax advisor, that he had to make an
election that was effective as of Year 2, until his current tax preparer discovered such
failure in Year 4.

A states that the Internal Revenue Service has not communicated with him in any way
regarding his RRSP.

PLR-142564-09 2

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a
taxpayer a reasonable extension of time, under the rules set forth in Treas. Reg. §
301.9100-3, to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue
Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100 -1(b) provides that an election includes an application for relief
in respect of tax, and defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is
prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or
announcement.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will be
granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the
taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the
interests of the Government.

In the present situation, the election provided in Rev. Proc. 2002-23 is a regulatory
election within the meaning of Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(b). Therefore, the
Commissioner has discretionary authority under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100–1(c) to grant A
an extension of time, provided that A satisfies the standards set forth in Treas. Reg. §
301.9100-3(a).

Based on the facts and circumstances of this case, we conclude that A satisfies the
standards of Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3. Accordingly, A is granted an extension of time
until 60 days from the date of this ruling letter to elect the provisions of Rev. Proc. 2002-
23 for Tax Years.

Pursuant to section 4.07 of Rev. Proc. 2002-23, the election once made cannot be
revoked except with the consent of the Commissioner. A must file Form 8891 for 2004
and all subsequent tax years for which A has not already filed a Form 8891 until the tax
year in which a final distribution is made from the RRSP.

1
The Convention between the United States of America and Canada with respect to Taxes on Income
and on Capital, signed at Washington on September 26, 1980, as amended by protocols signed June 14,
1983, March 28, 1984, March 17, 1995, July 29, 1997, and Sept. 21, 2007.
PLR-142564-09 3

As provided in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(a), the granting of an extension of time is not a
determination that A is otherwise eligible to make the above-described election.

No ruling has been requested, and none is expressed, as to the application of any other
section of the Code or regulations to the facts presented.

A copy of this ruling letter should be associated with A’s amended tax returns for Tax
Years.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who has requested it. I.R.C. § 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

                                     Sincerely,


                                     _____________________
                                     M. Grace Fleeman
                                     Senior Technical Reviewer
                                     CC:INTL:Br1

Enclosure:
Copy for 6110 purposes

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.