Counsel recommends a partial disallowance letter for a disputed injured spouse allocation
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
This Chief Counsel Advice addresses an injured spouse claim processed by the Austin Service Center. The Service Center allocated the refund under IRS procedures, but the taxpayer disagreed with the allocation. The advice states that the IRS should issue a Letter 106C partially disallowing the claim so the taxpayer can take the dispute to Appeals.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: What should the IRS do when a taxpayer disputes the allocation of a refund in an injured spouse claim?
- Outcome: Advice given
- Key authorities: IRC § 6402
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2010042116072953 Number: 201021022
Release Date: 5/28/2010
Office: ---------
UILC: 6402.00-00
From: ---------------------
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 4:07:32 PM
To: -------------------
Cc: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Injured spouse claim and 106(c) letter
Hi -----------Per our phone conversation, this e-mail is regarding the injured spouse case that was worked
in the Austin Service Center and referred by TAS. Specifically, the taxpayer filed a claim seeking injured
spouse relief with the Austin Service Center. The Austin Service Center processed the claim and
allocated the refund in accordance with IRS procedures, but the taxpayer disagreed with the allocation.
In this instance, because the taxpayer disagrees with the IRS's allocation, the IRS needs to issue the
taxpayer a 106C letter partially disallowing her claim so that she may take the issue up with Appeals.
If you have any other questions, or if the information in this e-mail is unclear or not helpful, please contact
me.
Regards,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.