Private Letter Ruling 1020029 Released May 21, 2010 Approved Transcribed from scan

PLR 1020029: IRS approved a five-year extension to amortize a plan's unfunded liabilities

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS approved a plan's request for a five-year extension to amortize unfunded liabilities described in IRC § 431(b)(2)(B) and § 431(b)(4). The approval was granted under § 431(d)(1), after the plan submitted the required information and an actuary's certification. The certification stated that, without the extension, the plan would have an accumulated funding deficiency in the current year or one of the next nine years, that the sponsor had adopted a funding-improvement plan, that projected assets would cover expected benefits and expenses during the extended period, and that the required notice had been provided. The extension applied to the eligible amortization charge bases identified in the application.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the plan receive a five-year extension to amortize its unfunded liabilities under IRC § 431(d)(1)?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 431(b)(2)(B), 431(b)(4), 431(d)(1), 304(b)(2)(B), 304(b)(4), and 6110(k)(3)

Full text (IRS public release)

Significant Index Number 0431.00-00

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

FEB 24 2010

Re:

Taxpayer =

Dear

This letter constitutes notice that approval has been granted for your request for
a 5-year automatic extension for amortizing the unfunded liabilities as of
January 1, 20 , for the above-named Plan which are described in sections
431(b)(2)(B) and 431(b)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”), and sections
304(b)(2)(B) and 304(b)(4) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of
1974 (“ERISA”). This extension is effective with the plan year beginning
January 1, 20
. This extension applies to the eligible amortization charge
bases as identified in your application submission, established as of January 1,
20 _, with a total outstanding balance of $ as of that date.

The extension of the amortization periods of the unfunded liabilities of the Plan
was granted in accordance with section 431(d)(1) of the Code. Section
431(d)(1)(A) of the Code requires the Secretary to extend the period of time
required to amortize any unfunded liability of a plan for a period of time (not in
excess of 5 years) if the Plan submits an application meeting the criteria stated in
section 431(d)(1)(B). The plan has submitted the required information to meet
the criteria in section 431(d)(1)(B), including a certification from the plan's actuary
that:

(i) absent the extension under subparagraph (A), the
plan would have an accumulated funding deficiency in the
current plan year or any of the 9 succeeding plan years,
(ii) the plan sponsor has adopted a plan to improve the
plan's funding status,

201020029

(iii) the plan is projected to have sufficient assets to
timely pay expected benefits and anticipated expenditures
over the amortization period as extended, and

(iv) the notice required under paragraph (3)(A) has been
provided.

We have sent a copy of this letter to the
and to the

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others
as precedent.

If you require further assistance in this matter, please contact
Sincerely yours,

David M. Ziegler
Manager, EP Actuarial Group 2

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.