Private Letter Ruling 1020022 Released May 21, 2010 Mixed outcome Transcribed from scan

PLR 1020022: IRS approved five years of neighborhood-land treatment, then denied later treatment

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS considered a church's request to use the neighborhood-land rule for property it purchased and mortgaged for future charitable use. The church initially rented the property while developing plans for a spirituality and retreat center. The IRS found it reasonably certain that the land would be used for an exempt purpose within 15 years and that the property qualified for the rule for five years after acquisition. However, after the church accepted a plan that no longer required demolition or removal of the existing structure, the IRS concluded that the church had abandoned the required intent. Income from the property therefore was not protected by the neighborhood-land rule for the sixth and later years.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the church apply the neighborhood-land rule to property held for future exempt use, including after the plan for the property changed?
  • Outcome: Mixed
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 501(c)(3), 512(b)(4), 514(b)(1)(A)(i), 514(b)(3), 514(b)(3)(E), and 6110(k)(3); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.514(b)-1(d)(1)(iii), 1.514(b)-1(d)(3), and 1.514(b)-1(e)(4)

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

Number: 201020022
Contact Person:
Release Date: 5/21/2010
Identification Number:

Date: February 25, 2010
Telephone Number:
Employer Identification Number:

UIL: 514.00-00

Legend
Date 1 =

Dear :

We have considered your ruling request dated April 2, 2008 requesting a ruling under section
514(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code), the “Neighborhood Land Rule”.

The information submitted shows that you are a church that is recognized as exempt from
Federal income tax under section 501(c)(3) of the Code. You purchased and mortgaged
property to expand your charitable activities. For the first five years, you rented the property to
four separate tenants under three-year leases. Almost four years after the purchase date, your
long range planning committee awarded a contract to an architectural firm to conduct a space
and facilities study of the property to determine how you could use it to fulfill your long-range
needs. One year later, the committee accepted the firm’s new plan. The scheduled completion
date for the renovation and conversion of your property is twelve years after purchase. The
committee intends to secure the church congregation’s acceptance and approval of the plan
and funding strategy soon.

According to the plan, you will build a spirituality and retreat center on the property. The first
floor would provide spaces for classes, lectures, study groups, meditation and other events.
The second floor would provide private apartments for visiting pastors, lecturers, and retreat
guests. The plan also adds a meditative garden and a parking lot. Although the existing
structure is not a registered historic structure, any changes are subject to local review and
approval. Since the local review board prefers renovation to demolition of historic structures,
your plan recommends refurbishing the front, adding new construction and only demolishing the
rear of the existing building. You forwarded your request for this ruling at least 90 days before
the fifth year after acquisition.

Rulings Requested:

You have requested the following ruling:

That it is reasonably certain that the land will be used for an exempt purpose within 15 years of
its acquisition, and that the property will be exempt from the debt-financed property provisions of
sections 512(b)(4) and 514 of the Code as a result of the neighborhood land rule under section
514(b)(3).

Law:

Section 512(b)(4) and 514 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) generally imposes income tax
on unrelated business taxable income from debt-financed property.

Section 514(b)(1)(A)(i) of the Code states, in part, that the term “debt-financed property” means
any property which is held to produce income and with respect to which there is an acquisition
indebtedness.

Section 514(b)(3)(A) of the Code provides a special rule for neighborhood land. If an
organization acquires real property for the principal purpose of using the land (commencing
within 10 years of the time of acquisition) in the manner described in paragraph (1)(A) for an
exempt purpose and at the time of acquisition the property is in the neighborhood of other
property owned by the organization which is used in such manner, the real property acquired for
such future use shall not be treated as debt-financed property so long as the organization does
not abandon its intent to so use the land within the 10-year period. The preceding sentence
shall not apply for any period after the expiration of the 10-year period, and shall apply after the
first 5 years of the 10-year period only if the organization establishes to the satisfaction of the
Secretary that it is reasonably certain that the land will be used in the described manner before
the expiration of the 10-year period.

Section 514(b)(3)(E) of the Code states that, in applying this paragraph to a church, a 15-year
period shall be applied in lieu of the 10-year period referred to in subparagraph (A) and (B), and
subparagraphs (A) and (B)(ii) shall apply whether or not the acquired land meets the
neighborhood test.

Section 1.514(b)-1(d)(1)(iii) of the regulations states that the neighborhood land rule shall not
apply to any property after the expiration of 10 years from the date of acquisition. Further, the
neighborhood land rule shall apply after the first 5 years of the 10-year period, only if the
organization establishes to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that future use of the acquired
land in furtherance of the organization’s exempt purpose before the expiration of the 10-year
period is reasonably certain. In order to satisfy the Commissioner, the organization does not
necessarily have to show binding contracts. However, it must at least have a definite plan
detailing a specific improvement and a completion date, and some affirmative action toward the
fulfillment of such a plan. This information shall be forwarded to the Commissioner of Internal
Revenue, Washington, D.C. 20224, for a ruling at least 90 days before the end of the fifth year
after acquisition of the land.

Section 1.514(b)-1(d)(3)(i) of the regulations states that the neighborhood land rule applies with
respect to any structure on the land when acquired by the organization, or to the land occupied
by the structure, only so long as the intended future use of the land in furtherance of the
organization’s exempt purpose requires that the structure be demolished or removed in order to
use the land in such a manner. Thus, during the first five years after acquisition (and for
subsequent years if there is a favorable ruling in accordance with subparagraph (1)(iii) of this
paragraph) improved property is not debt financed so long as the organization does not
abandon its intent to demolish the existing structure and use the land in furtherance of its
exempt purpose.

Section 1.514(b)-1(d)(3)(i), of the regulations, Example (4)(1) describes a university that
acquires a contiguous tract of land containing an office building for the principal purpose of
demolishing the office building and building a modern dormitory. Five years later the dormitory
has not been constructed, and the university has failed to satisfy the Commissioner that the
office building will be demolished and the land will be used in furtherance of its exempt purpose
(and consequently has failed to obtain a favorable ruling under subparagraph (1)(iii) of this
paragraph). In the ninth taxable year after acquisition, the university converts the office building
into an administration building. Under these circumstances, during the sixth, seventh, and
eighth years after acquisition, the office building is treated as debt-financed property because
the office building was not demolished or removed. Therefore, the income derived from such
property during these years shall be subject to tax on unrelated business income.

Section 1.514(b)-1(d)(3)(ii) of the regulations states that the neighborhood land rule does not
apply to structures erected on the land after acquisition of the land.

Section 1.514(b)-1(e)(4) of the regulations states that the limitations stated in paragraph
(d)(3)(1) and (ii) of this section shall similarly apply to the rules contained in this paragraph.

Analysis:

Normally, we do not treat income from real property as unrelated business taxable income
unless the property is debt-financed. Debt-financed property is defined as property that is held
to produce income and with respect to which there is an acquisition indebtedness under section
514(b)(1)(A)(i) of the Code. Generally, if an exempt organization purchases debt-financed
property for prospective exempt use, the “neighborhood land rule” described in section
514(b)(3)(A) exempts income derived from the property from unrelated business income tax for
10 years after the date of acquisition. Churches enjoy two additional advantages under the
neighborhood land rule. They do not have to meet the neighborhood test and their income is
exempt from unrelated business income tax for an additional 5 years under section
514(b)(3)(E).

To benefit from the neighborhood land rule, you must meet the requirements set forth in section
1.514(b)-1(d)(1)(iii) of the regulations. First, you must establish with reasonable certainty that
you will use the property to further your exempt purpose before the 15-year expiration date. To
make this showing, you must forward a definite plan detailing a specific improvement, a
completion date and some affirmative action toward the fulfillment of the plan to the Service with
a request for a ruling at least 90 days before the end of the fifth year after acquiring the
property. You forwarded this ruling request within the time specified and submitted definite
plans detailing the specific improvements you will make and actions you have taken, along with
an estimated completion date set well before the expiration of the 15-year time period.

However, the special rules for churches in section 1.514(b)-1(e)(4) of the regulations reference
additional limitations described in sections 1.514(b)-1(d)(3)(i) and (ii) with regard to the
structures on property subject to the neighborhood land rule. The limitations apply the rule to
the land and the existing structure on the date of acquisition only if the intended future use of
the land requires that you demolish or remove the structure in order to use the land to further
your exempt purposes. The rule does not apply to structures erected on the land after
acquisition. Therefore, since you did not abandon your intent to demolish the structure on your
property for the first five years, the neighborhood land rule will exclude income produced by
your property from tax. However, on the sixth year after acquisition, your long range planning
committee accepted the architectural firm’s plan, which does not require you to demolish or
remove the original structures to use the property to further your exempt purposes. Like the
organization described in Example (4)(1) of section 1.514(b)-1(d)(3)(i), when you accepted the
plan, you abandoned your intent to demolish or remove all of the original structure to use the
land to further your exempt purposes. Therefore, for the sixth and subsequent years after
acquisition, the neighborhood land rule will not exclude income produced by your property from
tax as unrelated business income.

Conclusion:
Based on the foregoing, we rule as follows:

It is reasonably certain that the land will be used for an exempt purpose within 15 years of its
acquisition, and that the property is exempt from the debt-financed property provisions of
section 512(b)(4) and 514 of the Code as a result of the neighborhood land rule under section
514(b)(3) for 5 years beginning with the date of acquisition.

Since you abandoned your intent to demolish or remove the original structure to further your
exempt purpose, we rule that your plan for the property does not satisfy the requirements of
section 1.514(b)-1(d)(1)(iii) of the regulations and income from your property will not be exempt
from the debt-financed property provisions of sections 512(b)(4) and 514 of the Code as a result
of the neighborhood land rule under section 514(b)(3) for the sixth and subsequent years after
the date of acquisition.

This ruling will be made available for public inspection under section 6110 of the Code after
certain deletions of identifying information are made. For details, see enclosed Notice 437,
Notice of Intention to Disclose. A copy of this ruling with deletions that we intend to make
available for public inspection is attached to Notice 437. If you disagree with our proposed
deletions, you should follow the instructions in Notice 437.

This ruling is directed only to the organization that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

This ruling is based on the facts as they were presented and on the understanding that there will
be no material changes in these facts. This ruling does not address the applicability of any
section of the Code or regulations to the facts submitted other than with respect to the sections
described. Because it could help resolved questions concerning your federal income tax status,
this ruling should be kept in your permanent records.

If you have any questions about this ruling, please contact the person whose name and
telephone number are shown in the heading of this letter.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney currently on file with the Internal Revenue Service, we
are sending a copy of this letter to your authorized representative.

Sincerely,

Manager, Exempt Organizations
Technical Group 2

Enclosure
Notice 437

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.