CCA 201020019: Counsel explained the presumption for a partner signing a partnership return
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
In an internal Chief Counsel email concerning an allegedly invalid signing of a TEFRA partnership return, the sender quoted IRC § 6063. That provision requires a partnership return to be signed by any one of the partners and treats the partner's name on the return as prima facie evidence that the partner was authorized to sign for the partnership.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: What is the effect of a partner signing a partnership return under IRC § 6063?
- Outcome: Advice given
- Key authorities: IRC § 6063
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2010042013523937 Number: 201020019
Release Date: 5/21/2010
Office: ---------
UILC: 6063.00-00
From: --------------------
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 1:52:42 PM
To: --------------------
Cc: -----------------------------------
Subject: RE: Invalid signing of TEFRA partnership
Section 6063 provides that a partnership return "shall be signed by any one of the partners. The fact that
a partner's name is signed on the return shall be prima facie evidence that such partner is authorized to
sign the return on behalf of the partnership."
Under this Code section, the presumption is that the partner had authority to sign.
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace