Private Letter Ruling 1020007 Released May 21, 2010 Approved

PLR 1020007: IRS allowed an S corporation to continue after an inadvertent trust-election failure

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS ruled that a corporation's S corporation election terminated when its stock passed to trusts whose beneficiaries had not made the required qualified subchapter S trust elections. The IRS found that the termination was inadvertent because the corporation and its shareholders had reported consistently as though the S election remained in effect and had not acted for tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning. The corporation could continue to be treated as an S corporation if the affected beneficiaries filed QSST elections within 60 days after the ruling, effective as of the termination date. The ruling did not express an opinion on the corporation's general S corporation eligibility or the trusts' eligibility to be QSSTs.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the corporation's S corporation election be restored after stock was transferred to trusts whose beneficiaries failed to make timely QSST elections?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361(c)(2), 1361(d), 1362(d)(2), and 1362(f); Treas. Reg. § 1.1362-4(b)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201020007 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 5/21/2010 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
Index Numbers: 1362.00-00, 1362.04-00 ----------------------, ID No. -------------
Telephone Number:
---------------------
--------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
----------------------------------- CC:PSI:B03
------------------ PLR-145314-09
----------------------------- Date:
----------------------- February 17, 2010

                                                LEGEND

Company = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------

State 1 = -------------

State 2 = --------------

Date 1 = ---------------------

Date 2 = ----------------------

Date 3 = ------------------

Date 4 = ----------------------

Trust 1 = --------------------------------------------

Trust 2 = --------------------------------------------------

Trust 3 = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------

Trust 4 = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------

Trust 5 = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------

PLR-145314-09 2

Trust 6 = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------

Trust 7 = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------

Trust 8 = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------

Trust 9 = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------

Trust 10 = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------

Trust 11 = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------

Trust 12 = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------

Trust 13 = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------

Trust 14 = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------

Shareholder = -------------------------

a = --------

b = -----

Dear ----------------:

    This letter responds to a letter dated October 7, 2009, submitted on behalf of

Company by Company’s authorized representatives, requesting a ruling under § 1362(f)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

                                              FACTS

    Company incorporated in State 1 on Date 1, and elected to be an S corporation

effective Date 2. On Date 3, Shareholder sold a shares of Company stock to Trust 1,
and b shares of Company stock to Trust 2. Trust 1 and Trust 2 are governed under the

PLR-145314-09 3

laws of State 2. Company represents Trust 1 and Trust 2 were grantor trusts wholly-
owned by Shareholder during Shareholder’s lifetime, thus permissible S corporation
shareholders under § 1361(c)(2)(A)(i). Company represents that under State 2 law on
Date 4, Trust 1’s ownership of Company stock transferred to Trust 3, Trust 4, Trust 5,
Trust 6, Trust 7, and Trust 8, and Trust 2’s ownership of Company stock transferred to
Trust 9, Trust 10, Trust 11, Trust 12, Trust 13, and Trust 14.

    Company represents that Trust 3, Trust 4, Trust 5, Trust 6, Trust 7, Trust 8, Trust

9, Trust 10, Trust 11, Trust 12, Trust 13, and Trust 14 (together, the Trusts) qualify to be
qualified subchapter S trusts (QSSTs) under § 1361(d), except that the beneficiary of
each respective trust failed to make the election under § 1361(d)(2). Therefore, these
trusts were not eligible S corporation shareholders, and Company’s S corporation
election terminated on Date 4.

   Company represents that the circumstances resulting in the termination of

Company’s S corporation election were inadvertent and were not motivated by tax
avoidance or retroactive tax planning. Company further represents that Company and
Company’s shareholders have filed tax returns consistent with Company being an S
corporation and with the Trusts being treated as QSSTs. Company and its
shareholders agree to make any adjustments consistent with the treatment of Company
as an S corporation as may be required by the Secretary with respect to the period
specified by § 1362(f).

                              LAW AND ANALYSIS

      Section 1361(a)(1) provides that the term "S corporation" means, with respect

to any taxable year, a small business corporation for which an election under § 1362(a)
is in effect for such year.

   Section 1361(b)(1)(B) provides that, for purposes of subchapter S, the term

"small business corporation" means a domestic corporation which is not an ineligible
corporation and which does not have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate, a
trust described in § 1361(c)(2), or an organization described in § 1361(c)(6)) who is not
an individual.

    Section 1361(c)(2)(A)(i) provides that, for the purposes of § 1362(b)(1)(B), a trust

all of which is treated (under subpart E of part I of subchapter J of Chapter 1) as owned
by an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States, may be an S
corporation shareholder.

   Section 1361(d)(1) provides that, in the case of a QSST with respect to which a

beneficiary makes an election under § 1361(d)(2), (A) such trust will be treated as a
trust described in § 1361(c)(2)(A)(i), and (B) for purposes of § 678(a), the beneficiary of
such trust shall be treated as the owner of that portion of the trust which consists of

PLR-145314-09 4

stock in an S corporation with respect to which the election under § 1361(d)(2) is made,
and (C) for purposes of applying §§ 465 and 469 to the beneficiary of the trust, the
disposition of the S corporation stock by the trust shall be treated as a disposition by
such beneficiary.

  Section 1361(d)(2) provides that a beneficiary of a QSST (or his legal

representative) may elect to have § 1361(d) apply.

    Section 1361(d)(3) provides that for purposes of § 1361(d), the term “qualified

subchapter S trust” means a trust (A) the terms of which require that (i) during the life of
the current income beneficiary, there shall be only 1 income beneficiary of the trust, (ii)
any corpus distributed during the life of the current income beneficiary may be
distributed only to such beneficiary, (iii) the income interest of the current income
beneficiary in the trust shall terminate on the earlier of such beneficiary's death or the
termination of the trust, and (iv) upon the termination of the trust during the life of the
current income beneficiary, the trust shall distribute all of its assets to such beneficiary,
and (B) all of the income (within the meaning of § 643(b)) of which is distributed (or
required to be distributed) currently to 1 individual who is a citizen or resident of the
United States. A substantially separate and independent share of a trust within the
meaning of § 663(c) shall be treated as a separate trust for purposes of § 1361(d) and
§ 1361(c).

  Section 1362(d)(2)(A) provides that an election under § 1362(a) shall be

terminated whenever (at any time on or after the 1st day of the 1st taxable year for which
the corporation is an S corporation) such corporation ceases to be a small business
corporation.

   Section 1362(f) provides that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any

corporation was not effective for the taxable year for which made (determined without
regard to § 1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the requirements of § 1361(b) or
to obtain shareholder consents or was terminated under § 1362(d)(2) or (3), (2) the
Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in such ineffectiveness or
termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after
discovery of the circumstances resulting in such ineffectiveness or termination, steps
were taken so that the corporation for which the election was made or the termination
occurred is a small business corporation, or to acquire the required shareholder
consents, and (4) the corporation for which the election was made or the termination
occurred, and each person who was a shareholder in such corporation at any time
during the period specified pursuant to 1362(f), agrees to make such adjustments
(consistent with the treatment of such corporation as an S corporation) as may be
required by the Secretary with respect to such period, then, notwithstanding the
circumstances resulting in such ineffectiveness or termination, such corporation shall be
treated as an S corporation during the period specified by the Secretary.

PLR-145314-09 5

    Section 1.1362-4(b) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that for purposes of

§ 1.1362-4(a), the determination of whether a termination or invalid election was
inadvertent is made by the Commissioner. The corporation has the burden of
establishing that under the relevant facts and circumstances the Commissioner should
determine that the termination or invalid election was inadvertent. The fact that the
terminating event or invalidity of the election was not reasonably within the control of the
corporation and, in the case of a termination, was not part of a plan to terminate the
election, or the fact that the terminating event or circumstance took place without the
knowledge of the corporation, notwithstanding its due diligence to safeguard itself
against such an event or circumstance, tends to establish that the termination or
invalidity of the election was inadvertent.

                                  CONCLUSION

    Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude

that Company's S corporation election terminated on Date 4, when stock in Company
was transferred to impermissible shareholders. We further conclude that the
termination was inadvertent within the meaning of § 1362(f). Pursuant to the provisions
of § 1362(f), Company will be treated as continuing to be an S corporation on and after
Date 4, unless Company’s S corporation election is otherwise terminated under
§ 1362(d), provided that the respective income beneficiaries for Trust 3, Trust 4, Trust 5,
Trust 6, Trust 7, Trust 8, Trust 9, Trust 10, Trust 11, Trust 12, Trust 13, and Trust 14 file
a QSST election with the appropriate service center within 60 days following the date of
this letter to be effective Date 4. A copy of this letter should be attached to each of the
QSST elections.

   Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied

concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this letter. Specifically, no opinion is expressed or implied regarding
Company’s eligibility to be treated as an S corporation or the Trusts’ eligibility to be
QSSTs.

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)

provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

  In accordance with a power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a

copy of this letter to your authorized representatives.

PLR-145314-09 6

   The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations

submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the request for the ruling, it is subject to verification on examination.

                                 Sincerely,

                                 /s/

                                 James A. Quinn
                                 Senior Counsel, Branch 3
                                 Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                 (Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2):

  Copy of this letter
  Copy for § 6110 purposes

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.