Private Letter Ruling 1020004 Released May 21, 2010 Approved

PLR 1020004: IRS ruled that wrongful-death compensation was excludable from gross income

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS ruled that compensation received from a government department for the wrongful death of a family member was excludable from gross income under IRC § 104(a)(2). The payment arose from a legislative settlement that replaced earlier litigation and covered wrongful-death and emotional-distress claims attributable to physical injury. The exclusion applied to compensatory damages, as adjusted under the joint prosecution agreement, but not to amounts attributable to medical expenses deducted in a prior year. The ruling did not address tax consequences beyond that conclusion.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Was compensation received under a legislative settlement for wrongful death and related emotional distress excludable under IRC § 104(a)(2)?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC § 104(a)(2); Treas. Reg. § 1.104-1(c)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201020004 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 5/21/2010 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
Index Number: 104.03-00 --------------------, ID No. -----------------
Telephone Number:
---------------------
---------------------------- Refer Reply To:
-------------------------- CC:ITA:4
--------------------------- PLR-140340-09
Date:
February 04, 2010

In re: -------------------------------------------------------------

LEGEND:

Act = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Agency = ---------------------------------------------------

Agreement = ----------------------------------------

B = ----------------------------

Court = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Department = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Entity1 = --------------------------------------------------------

Entity2 = ----------------------------------

Entity2 Claimants = -------------------

Incident = -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


T = --------------------------------------

Z = -------------------------------------------------

c = --------

PLR-140340-09 2

Date 1 = --------------------

Date 2 = ----------------------

Year 1 = -------

Year 2 = -------

Year 3 = -------

f = ----------------------

$q = $ ---------------

$r = $---------------

$t = $ --------------------

$v = $ --------------------

w = -----

$y = $ ----------------

Dear -----------------:

This is in reply to your request for a ruling that any payment you receive from
Department for the wrongful death of B, your c, is excludable from your gross income
under § 104(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code.

FACTS

Your c was one of w individuals killed in Incident. In Year 1, the estates of those killed
and their survivors (including you) entered into a joint prosecution agreement (JPA) to
pursue claims for damages against Entity1 and its officials who were responsible for
Incident. The JPA sets forth how the plaintiffs will divide any amounts they recover in
litigation or settlement of their claims.

Initial litigation The estates of those killed and their survivors initially sued Entity1 in
Court in Year 1. The causes of action included claims for survivorship, wrongful death,
and intentional infliction of emotional distress. You sought recovery for intentional
infliction of emotional distress caused by the death of your c. In Year 2, Court granted
summary judgment for plaintiffs on the issue of liability. In Year 3, Court awarded the
plaintiffs an aggregate recovery of $v for compensatory damages, prejudgment interest,

PLR-140340-09 3

and punitive damages. You were awarded an aggregate of $y, $r against T and $q
against Z.

Legislative settlement Subsequently, on Date 1, Entity2 passed the Act to provide fair
compensation to all Entity2 Claimants who have f claims for wrongful death and
physical injury (including claims for emotional distress) against Entity1 through a
comprehensive settlement of those claims. Upon Entity1’s payment to Entity2, the Act
voided all prior court proceedings and judgments for f claims by Entity2 Claimants
against Entity1 or its officials, and permanently precluded Entity2 Claimants from
asserting f claims against Entity1 or its officials. On Date 2, Entity1 and Entity2 entered
into the Agreement to resolve all f claims against Entity1. Entity1 then transferred $t to
Entity2, which will be paid to claimants covered by the Agreement. Thus, pursuant to the
Act, Court award of damages to the plaintiffs was voided and has been vacated.

Agency has established procedures to compensate victims pursuant to the Agreement.
As a survivor of an individual killed in Incident, you must file a claim with Department to
recover damages for claims of wrongful death based on the death of your c. You
represent that Department’s payment will not include interest or punitive damages.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 104(a)(2) provides that, except in the case of amounts attributable to (and not in
excess of) deductions allowed under § 213 (relating to medical, etc., expenses) for any
prior taxable year, gross income does not include the amount of any damages received
(whether by suit or agreement) on account of personal physical injuries or physical
sickness.

Section 1.104-1(c) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that the term “damages
received (whether by suit or agreement)” means an amount received through
prosecution of a legal suit or action based upon tort or tort type rights or through a
settlement agreement entered into in lieu of such prosecution.

Section 1605 of the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996 limits the exclusion from
gross income provided by § 104(a)(2) to amounts received on account of personal
physical injuries or physical sickness (subject to one exception). In H.R. Conf. Rep. No.
104-737 at 301 (1996), Congress expressed its intent concerning the treatment of
wrongful death damages and emotional distress damages attributable to a physical
injury:

   [D]amages (other than punitive damages) received on account of a claim of
   wrongful death continue to be excludable from taxable income as under present
   law. … Because all damages received on account of physical injury or physical
   sickness are excludable from gross income, the exclusion from gross income
   applies to any damages received based on a claim of emotional distress that is
   attributable to physical injury or physical sickness.

PLR-140340-09 4

The action you brought in Court and the claim you file with Department each seek
recovery of damages for emotional distress attributable to a personal physical injury.
These claims are based in tort under § 1.104-1(c).

Under the Act, any recovery of compensatory damages that Department awards you is
for the wrongful death of your c. This wrongful death recovery (as adjusted by the JPA)
is received on account of a personal physical injury under § 104(a)(2).

CONCLUSION

Based strictly on the information submitted and the representations made, we conclude
that the amount you receive from Department (as adjusted by the JPA) for the wrongful
death of your c is excludable from your gross income under § 104(a)(2) (except for any
amounts attributable to medical expenses that you in fact deducted on a prior year(s)’
federal income tax return).

We do not express or imply an opinion on the federal tax consequences of any aspect
of these transactions other than those expressed in the conclusion above.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides
that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations that
you submitted under penalties of perjury. While this office has not verified any of the
material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on
examination.

You must attach to any income tax return to which it is relevant a copy of this letter or, if
you file your returns electronically, a statement providing the date and control number of
this letter ruling.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, we are sending a copy
of this letter to your authorized representative.

                                              Sincerely,


                                              Michael J. Montemurro
                                              Branch Chief
                                              Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                              (Income Tax & Accounting)

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2010, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.