CCA 201017056: ERISA fiduciary asset-jurisdiction question belongs with DOL
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel explained that ERISA section 404(b) restricts where a fiduciary may maintain indicia of ownership of plan assets. The message identified Department of Labor regulations addressing the restriction and noted exceptions for regulated banks, trust companies, and similar institutions. Because the issue was under the Department of Labor's jurisdiction, the message recommended contacting DOL to discuss the facts.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Which agency should address an ERISA fiduciary's maintenance of plan-asset ownership indicia outside a United States district court's jurisdiction?
- Outcome: advice given
- Key authorities: 29 U.S.C. § 1104(b); 29 C.F.R. § 2550.404b-1; ERISA § 404(b)
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2010040114593850 Number: 201017056
Release Date: 4/30/2010
Office: -------------------------
UILC: 4975.00-00
From: --------------------
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 2:59:47 PM
To: ------------------
Cc:
Subject: RE: ERISA question
The provision 29 USC 1104(b) that you are referring to is section 404(b) of ERISA, that provides that no fiduciary may maintain the indicia of ownership of any assets of a plan outside the jurisdiction of the District Courts of the U.S., except as authorized by the Secretary of Labor by regulation. The Department of Labor (DOL) promulgated such regulations at 29 C.F.R. § 2550.404b-1.
In the ERISA Conference Report, Congress noted its intent to prevent so-called “runaway assets” and stated that the basic objective of the requirement that the indicia of ownership remain within the jurisdiction of a United States District Court is to preclude frustration of adequate fiduciary supervision and remedies for breach of trust. However, the risk of misappropriation of plan assets and their removal beyond the effective process of an American court is minimal where the assets are under the management or control of a bank, trust company or similar institution which is subject to adequate regulation and examination by State or Federal supervisory agencies. Such an institution would be responsive to legal process and to traditional principles of fiduciary responsibility under trust law. See rd nd
H.R. Rep. No. 93-1280, 93 Cong., 2 Sess., at 306 (1974) (emphasis added).
Attached is DOL Advisory Opinion 2008-04A (April 8, 2008) that discusses the application of section 404(b) of ERISA and the regulations at 29 C.F.R. § 2550.404b-1 as it applies to a fiduciary that is a bank. However, it should be noted that the fiduciary could also be an insurance company which is qualified under the laws of more than one State to manage, acquire, or dispose of any asset of a plan or an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. If you want to get a copy of 29 C.F.R. § 2550.404b-1 go to the following DOL website: http://www.dol.gov/dol/allcfr/ebsa/Title_29/Part_2550/29CFR2550.404b-1.htm .
Because this is an ERISA item that is under the jurisdiction of DOL, they would be the better place to call to discuss the facts of your case. If you want me to set up a conference call with someone at DOL call me.
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace