CCA 201017049: Form 872 extends periods for refunds and partnership filings

Number
201017049
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Partnership and Individual Partner Returns
Code sections
§ 6227, § 6501, § 6511
Ruling dated
April 2, 2010
Publicly released
April 30, 2010

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel explained how provisions of the current Form 872 operate when a taxpayer extends the statute of limitations. Paragraph 2 restates the law for refunds of nonpartnership items and informs taxpayers that a statute extension also extends the period for filing a refund claim under section 6511(c)(1). Paragraph 4 extends the period for filing administrative adjustment requests under section 6227(b) and grants additional extensions for filing suit involving partnership items and converted partnership items.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: What filing periods are extended by paragraphs 2 and 4 of Form 872?
  • Outcome: advice given
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 6227(b), 6501, and 6511(c)(1)

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2010040208354437 Number: 201017049
Release Date: 4/30/2010
Office: ----------
UILC: 6501.04-13

From: -------------------
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 8:35:49 AM
To: ------------------------
Cc: -----------
Subject: RE: New Form 872

Paragraph 2 of the current Form 872 is just a restatement of the law as it applies to refunds of nonpartnership items. Paragraph 2 is included essentially for information purposes for taxpayers who may be unaware that statute extensions also extend the period for filing a refund claim under section 6511(c)(1) for nonpartnership items.

Paragraph 4, first sentence, as a matter of law under section 6227(b), operates to extend the period for filing AAR's under section 6227(b) to 6 months from the end of the extension. The second and third sentence grant additional extensions for filing suit for partnership items and converted partnership items that would not otherwise occur without an agreement.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace