CCA 201016071: FPAAs may be issued to partners when barred-year items affect later open years

Number
201016071
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Partners Treated as Parties
Code sections
§ 6226
Ruling dated
March 23, 2010
Publicly released
April 23, 2010

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel Advice recommends issuing final partnership administrative adjustments to partners even when the statute has expired for the partnership year under examination in two situations. The first is when a partner may carry losses from the barred year forward to an open year. The second is when property distributed to a partner in the barred year may be sold in a later open year. The advice identifies Kligfeld v. Commissioner and G-1 Holdings v. Commissioner as supporting these scenarios.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: When may the IRS issue an FPAA to a partner for a partnership year whose statute has expired?
  • Outcome: Advice given
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6226; Kligfeld v. Commissioner; G-1 Holdings v. Commissioner

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2010032316194637 Number: 201016071
Release Date: 4/23/2010
Office: ----------
UILC: 6226.03-00

From: -------------------
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 4:19:48 PM
To: --------------------
Cc: -----------
Subject: RE: TEFRA Issues on ------ related cases

I agree that we should issue FPAA's to partners with statutes that have expired for the partnership year under examination: (1) if there is any potential carryforward by these partners of losses from the barred examination year to an open year of the partner; or (2) if property is distributed to a partner in the barred year that may be sold by the partner in a later open year. The above two scenarios reflect the holdings of Kligfeld v. Commissioner and G-1 Holdings v. Commissioner, respectively.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace