CCA 201016061: Merger structure may affect post-merger interest netting under section 6621(d)
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel Advice discusses whether interest on overpayments from pre-merger years may be netted against interest on underpayments from post-merger years under section 6621(d). The email raises an Energy East Corporation decision that appeared to reach a different conclusion and notes that the corporate structures differed because the corporations in that case survived the merger. It asks whether that distinction affects the IRS position on using pre-merger overpayments for post-merger interest netting. The released text does not state a final answer.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Can pre-merger overpayments be used for post-merger interest netting under section 6621(d) when a court decision involves a different merger structure?
- Outcome: Advice given
- Key authorities: IRC § 6621(d); Energy East Corporation v. United States
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2010031517403148 Number: 201016061
Release Date: 4/23/2010
Office: ------------------
UILC: 6621(d)
From: -------------------
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 5:40:39 PM
To: ----------------------
Cc: ---------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: FW: Netting case - memebers of consolidated group not same TP
Attachment: Energy EastCorp V. United States
Hi ---------
---------------------------forwarded your memo in the ------------, ------------, --------------- case on 6621(d) concluding that the interest for overpayments from --------------- in pre-merger years could be netted with the interest payment for underpayments of ----------- in post-merger years.
This case below, Energy East Corporation, from the Federal Claims court seems to come to a different conclusion. In the case below, the corporations survived the merger unlike the --------------- case that merged into ------------ with ------------ surviving. I don't know if that makes a difference. Could we talk to see if we still think ------------ can use the overpayments by --------------- prior to the merger for interest netting after the Energy East decision? I suppose we don't want to take a position that is inconsistent with the court decision. But I would like to hear from you whether there is an IRS position on this.
Thank you.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace