CCA 201014053: IRS discusses using an FPAA to determine one partnership item
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel advice questions the need for a substitute for return when the IRS seeks to determine only one partnership item. It states that if a TEFRA partnership exists for the redacted matter, the IRS should issue an FPAA determining the recapture amount and its allocation among the partners.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Should the IRS use an FPAA rather than a substitute for return to determine a single partnership item?
- Outcome: Advice given
- Key authorities: IRC § 6221
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2010030313015437 Number: 201014053
Release Date: 4/9/2010
Office: ----------
UILC: 6221.00-00
From: -------------------
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 1:01:57 PM
To: --------------------
Cc: ---------------------------------
Subject: RE: Designation of TMP
What would be the point of a SFR if you only want to determine one item? If a TEFRA partnership
actually exists for -------, just issue an FPAA determining the recapture amount and the allocation among
the partners.
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace