Affected items can arise from partnership items as reported or changed
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel Advice explained that affected items can be affected by partnership items either as reported or as changed at the partnership level. The advice stated that the partnership items do not need to change for affected items to exist. After a no-change FPAA is resolved, the IRS can issue affected-item notices of deficiency for partner-level limitations such as those under IRC §§ 465, 704(d), and 469. The partnership-level components remain binding, while partner-level issues are decided in the affected-item proceeding.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: How are affected items handled after partnership-level proceedings?
- Outcome: advice given
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 465, 469, 704(d), and 6231; Roberts v. Commissioner, 94 T.C. 853, 860 (1990)
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2010012810222237 Number: 201011012
Release Date: 3/19/2010
Office: ----------
UILC: 6231.05-00
From: -------------------
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 10:22:28 AM
To: ----------------------
Cc: -----------
Subject: RE: Tefra question
Affected items are affected by partnership items either as reported or changed at the partnership level. You don't need to change partnership items to have affected items. See, e.g., Roberts v. Commissioner, 94 T.C. 853 at 860 (1990).
After we issue a no change FPAA which either defaults of is petitioned and decided, we can issue affected item notices of deficiency for partner-level limitation issues such as 465, 704(d) or 469. We will be bound by the partnership level components of these issues either as reported on the partnership return or as redetermined at the partnership level. Only the partner-level issues, such as whether the partner worked the minimum hours to meet material participation requirement, would be determined in the affected item proceeding. The latest partnership audit guide in the IRM goes into these issues in detail.
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace