Taxpayers granted time to allocate GST exemption to a trust

Number
201010003
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Time and Manner of Allocation; Extension of Time for Making Certain Elections
Code sections
§ 2601, § 2611, § 2631, § 2632, § 2642, § 301.9100
Ruling dated
November 16, 2009
Publicly released
March 12, 2010

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS considered spouses’ request for more time to allocate their generation-skipping transfer tax exemptions to stock transfers made to a trust. Their accountant did not file the required gift tax returns and therefore did not make the allocations. The IRS granted a 60-day extension, with the allocations effective as of the transfer dates and based on the gift tax values of the transferred stock. The spouses were to file supplemental Forms 709 and consent to treat the transfers as made one-half by each spouse.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the spouses receive more time to allocate GST exemption to their portions of prior transfers to a trust?
  • Outcome: approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 2601, 2631, 2632, and 2642; Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201010003
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 3/12/2010
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
Index Number: 2632.01-00, 9100.00-00
-----------------------, ID No. -------------
Telephone Number:
--------------------------------
---------------------
-----------------------------
Refer Reply To:
-------------------
CC:PSI:B04
-------------------------
PLR-125881-09
Date:

Re: ------------------------
November 16, 2009
-------------------------------------------
----------------------------
-------------------------------------------

LEGEND:
Donor = ----------------------------
Spouse = ----------------------
Trust = -----------------------------------------------------
Date 1 = ------------------
Date 2 = ----------------------
Year = -------
Company 1 = -----------------------------
Company 2 = ------------------------
$u = -------------
$v = ------------
A = ------------------------------

Dear ------------------------------:

This letter responds to your authorized representative’s letter of March 25, 2009, requesting an extension of time pursuant to § 2642(g) of the Internal Revenue Code and § 301.9100 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to allocate generation- skipping transfer (GST) tax exemption to a transfer to a trust.

The facts and representations submitted are as follows. Donor created an irrevocable trust (the “Trust”) on Date 1 to be held, in part, for the benefit of his descendants. On the same day, Donor transferred shares of Company 1 stock, valued at $u, to the Trust. On Date 2, Donor transferred shares of Company 2 stock, valued at $v, to the Trust.

Donor and Spouse relied on A, a certified public accountant, for tax advice and to prepare the Forms 709, United States Gift (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return, reporting the transfers. However, the gift tax returns for Year were not filed.

Donor and Spouse will file gift tax returns for Year in which they consent to treat Donor’s
PLR-125881-09
2

transfers as made one-half by each. They are requesting an extension of time to allocate their respective GST exemption to their respective portion of the gifts. Section 2601 imposes a tax on every generation-skipping transfer (GST). A GST is defined under § 2611(a) as (1) a taxable distribution, (2) a taxable termination, and (3) a direct skip.

Section 2602 provides that the amount of the tax is the taxable amount multiplied by the applicable rate. Section 2641(a) defines “applicable rate” as the product of the maximum federal estate tax rate and the inclusion ratio with respect to the transfer.

Under § 2642(a)(1), the inclusion ratio with respect to any property transferred in a generation-skipping transfer is generally defined as the excess of 1 over the applicable fraction. The “applicable fraction”, as defined in § 2642(a)(2), is a fraction, the numerator of which is the amount of GST exemption under § 2631 allocated to the trust (or to property transferred in a direct skip), and the denominator of which is the value of the property transferred to the trust or involved in the direct skip.

Section 2631(a) provides that, for purposes of determining the inclusion ratio, every individual shall be allowed a GST exemption amount which may be allocated by such individual (or his executor) to any property with respect to which the individual is the transferor.

Section 2631(c) provides that, for purposes of subsection (a), the GST exemption amount for any calendar year shall be equal to the applicable exclusion amount under section 2010(c) for such calendar year.

Section 2632(a) provides that any allocation by an individual of his or her GST exemption under § 2631(a) may be made at any time on or before the date prescribed for filing the estate tax return for such individual's estate (determined with regard to extensions), regardless of whether such a return is required to be filed.

Section 26.2632-1(b)(2) of the Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Regulations provides that an allocation of GST exemption to property transferred during the transferor's lifetime, other than in a direct skip, is made on Form 709.

Section 2642(b)(1) provides, in relevant part, that if the allocation of the GST exemption to any transfers of property is made on a timely filed gift tax return or is deemed to be made under § 2632(b)(1) or (c)(1), the value of the property for purposes of determining the inclusion ratio shall be its value as finally determined for gift tax purposes and such allocation shall be effective on and after the date of the transfer.

Section 2642(g)(1)(A) provides, in part, that the Secretary shall by regulation prescribe such circumstances and procedures under which extensions of time will be granted to make an allocation of GST exemption.
PLR-125881-09
3

Section 2642(g)(1)(B) provides that in determining whether to grant relief, the Secretary shall take into account all relevant circumstances, including evidence of intent contained in the trust instrument or instrument of transfer and such other factors as the Secretary deems relevant. For purposes of determining whether to grant relief, the time for making the allocation shall be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute.

Notice 2001-50, 2001-2 C.B. 189, provides that under § 2642(G)(1)(B), the time for allocating the GST exemption to lifetime transfers is to be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute. The Notice further provides that taxpayers may seek an extension of time to make an allocation described in § 2642(b)(1) under the provisions of § 301.9100-3.

Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than 6 months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards used to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation (and not expressly provided by statute). Under § 301.9100-1(b), a regulatory election includes an election whose due date is prescribed by a notice published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. In accordance with § 2642(g)(1)(B) and Notice 2001-50, taxpayers may seek an extension of time to make an allocation described in § 2642(b)(1) under the provisions of § 301.9100-3.

Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

Section 301.9100-3(b)(1)(v) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

Based on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that the requirements of § 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Accordingly, Donor and Spouse are granted an extension of time of 60 days from the date of this letter to allocate GST exemption to the transfers of Company 1 and Company 2 shares to the Trust. The allocations will be effective as of the dates of the transfers, and the values of the transfers for gift tax purposes will be used in determining the amount of GST exemption to be allocated with respect to then.
PLR-125881-09
4

The allocations should be made on supplemental Forms 709, United States Gift (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return filed for Year 1, and filed with the Internal Revenue Service Center, Cincinnati, Ohio 45999. A copy of this letter should be attached to the supplemental Form 709.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayers and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

Except as specifically ruled herein, we express or imply no opinion on the federal tax consequences of the transaction under the cited provisions or under any other provisions of the Code.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

Sincerely,

Curt G. Wilson
Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)

Enclosures
Copy for section 6110 purposes

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace