CCA 201005050: A timely FPAA keeps the statute open for an unidentified indirect partner
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
This internal IRS Chief Counsel advice addresses the limitations period for an indirect partner whose identity is not yet known. It concludes that when the partner is an unidentified indirect partner and the IRS timely issues an FPAA, IRC § 6229(e) keeps the statute open for that partner until at least one year after the partner is identified.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: How does a timely FPAA affect the limitations period for an unidentified indirect partner?
- Outcome: Advice given.
- Key authorities: IRC § 6229(e).
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2010011316282937 Number: 201005050
Release Date: 2/5/2010
Office: ----------
UILC: 6229.05-00
From: -------------------
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 4:28:31 PM
To: --------------------
Cc: -----------
Subject: RE: 25% Omission of Income
If the partner is an unidentified indirect partner and we timely issued an FPAA, section 6229(e) keeps the
statute open for the unidentified partner at least until one year after he is identified.
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace