Determination 201002034: IRS retroactively revoked an installment-sale ruling

Number
201002034
Outcome
Revocation
Document type
Determination Letter
IRS subject
Sale of Real Property; Related Parties; Terms Defined
Code sections
§ 453, § 761
Ruling dated
October 1, 2009
Publicly released
January 15, 2010

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's determination, issued in 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2010
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS retroactively revoked an earlier ruling that treated the sale of a 25 percent interest in a limited liability company as a sale of underlying real estate eligible for installment-method reporting under section 453. The earlier ruling had relied on the representation that the entity was a disregarded entity eligible for exclusion from all or part of subchapter K under section 761(a). The IRS concluded that the entity did not qualify under section 761 because it was not an unincorporated organization and its participants were not co-owners of the property. The sale was therefore treated as a sale of a partnership interest rather than a sale of the entity's assets.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Should the earlier ruling allowing installment-method treatment for a sale of underlying real estate be revoked?
  • Outcome: Revocation
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 453 and 761(a); Rev. Proc. 2009-1, § 11.05(1)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201002034
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 1/15/2010
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 453.06-03, 453.11-00,
761.00-00
Person To Contact:
--------------------, ID No. ----------
--------------------------
Telephone Number:
------------------------
--------------------
----------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:ITA:B04
PLR-142707-09
Date:
October 01, 2009

LEGEND

Partnership 4 = --------------------------

Dear ------------------:

This letter revokes PLR 200937007 (March 10, 2009). The ruling concluded that your sale of a 25 percent interest in Partnership 4 was a sale of your interest in the underlying real estate that qualified for installment method reporting under § 453 of the Internal Revenue Code.

The ruling’s conclusions were based on information and representations you submitted, specifically that Partnership 4 was a limited liability company and a disregarded entity under § 761(a). However, Partnership 4 is not eligible to elect to be excluded from the application of all or part of subchapter K under § 761 as Partnership 4 is not an unincorporated organization and the participants are not the co-owners of the property. Thus, your sale of your interest in Partnership 4 is treated as a sale of a partnership interest and not as a sale of the assets held by Partnership 4.
PLR-142707-09
2

As there has been a misstatement or omission of controlling facts on which the letter ruling was based, the Service is retroactively revoking PLR 200937007. See Section 11.05(1) of Rev. Proc. 2009-1, 2009-1 I.R.B. 1, 48, which provides that an Associate Office will revoke a letter ruling and apply the revocation retroactively to the taxpayer for whom the letter ruling was issued if there has been a misstatement or omission of controlling facts.

Sincerely,

Michael J. Montemurro
Branch Chief, Branch 4
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Income Tax & Accounting)

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace