CCA 200953021: Advice on the section 6656 employment-tax deposit penalty
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2010, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel advice discussed the penalty under IRC § 6656 for failing to timely deposit tax. It stated that the penalty is generally 10 percent of the underpayment, absent reasonable cause. The advice described Revenue Ruling 75-191 as limiting the penalty for taxes that should have been withheld from employee compensation to the employer's share of FICA taxes, and noted that a Seventh Circuit decision discussed the penalty without citing that revenue ruling or adopting that limitation. Counsel asked for additional facts to provide further assistance.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: How does the section 6656 penalty apply when employment taxes were not timely deposited?
- Outcome: Advice given
- Key authorities: IRC § 6656; Rev. Rul. 75-191; University of Chicago v. United States, 547 F.3d 773 (7th Cir. 2008)
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2009120821210741 Number: 200953021
Release Date: 12/31/2009
Office: ----------------------------
UILC: 6656.00-00
From: -------------------
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 9:21:29 PM
To: -----------------------
Cc: --------------------
Subject: RE: Informal
Section 6656 imposes a mandatory penalty of 10% of the amount of the underpayment when a taxpayer fails to timely deposit tax due, absent reasonable cause. Revenue Ruling 75-191 provides that the section 6656 penalty does not apply in the case of failure to deposit taxes which should have been withheld from compensation paid to employees, but which were not withheld. According to the Rev. Rul., the section 6656 penalty will only apply to the extent of the employer's failure to deposit the employer's share of the FICA taxes. The 7th Circuit in University of Chicago v US, 547 F.3d 773, provides a good discussion of the application of the penalty, but interestingly does not cite the Rev. Rul., nor does it limit the penalty to the employer's share.
Is this the type of authority you were looking for? If you provide some additional facts, I can try to help.
_________
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace