CCA 200952053: Protective refund claims need not state a particular dollar amount
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel Advice addresses whether protective refund claims can be processed when they are recorded with a zero-dollar transaction code. The advice explains that a valid protective claim generally must be written, identify the contingencies, clearly alert the IRS to the essential nature of the claim, and identify the tax year or years involved. It states that case law and prior Counsel analysis indicate that a protective claim need not state a particular dollar amount, although a claim that gives little information about its grounds may present a separate issue. The advice treats the dispute described as an internal-process matter rather than a legal-interpretation question.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: What information must a protective refund claim contain to preserve the refund statute expiration date?
- Outcome: Advice given
- Key authorities: IRC § 6402; United States v. Kales, 314 U.S. 186 (1941); IRM 21.5.3.4.7.3(2); Rev. Proc. 2009-20
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2009111615310325 Number: 200952053
Release Date: 12/24/2009
Office: --------------
UILC: 6402.00-00
From: ----------------
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 3:31:07 PM
To: --------------------
Cc: ----------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Protective Refund Claims - -----------------------
-----------
Your inquiry regarding protective claims for refund touches upon several issues. The first of which concerns the amount of the refund claimed. Specifically, you asked whether an ostensible protective claim would be processable if it were processed with a TC 290 for $0. The concept of a protective claim being sufficient to hold open the RSED until later amendment by a formal claim is established by case law. See United States v. Kales, 314 U.S. 186 (1941). Generally, the claim: (1) must have a written component; (2) must identify and describe the contingencies affecting the claim; (3) must be sufficiently clear and definite to alert the Service as to the essential nature of the claim; and (4) must identify a specific year or years for which a refund is sought. As we discussed, Counsel has had occasion to address the sufficiency of a protective claim that failed to put the Commissioner on notice of the amount (reasonably expected upper bound) of the claim and explicitly has interpreted the case law to make clear that a valid protective claim need not state a particular dollar amount. Accordingly, such a defect alone might not be grounds to treat a protective claim as not processable.
In particular, you are reviewing ostensible protective claims that identify the grounds as being ----------------
---------, but that otherwise provide little information to apprise the Commissioner of the nature of the claim. For example, some of the claims do not indicate whether the taxpayer intends to claim a theft loss, remove income, or claim a deduction pursuant to the method discussed in Revenue Procedure 2009-20 (which provides a safe harbor that qualified taxpayers may use to determine the amount of a Ponzi-type scheme theft loss for a covered "discovery year"). Based on our conversations, we agreed that the dispute is one of internal processes as opposed to legal interpretation. All protective claims meet CAT-A criteria. IRM 21.5.3.4.7.3(2). ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------
Currently, there is no published guidance that describes the specific criteria for a protective claim to be processable by the Service (beyond requiring that the grounds for the claim be described with specificity). ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------
Feel free to call me directly if you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter further.
Regards,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace