CCA 200952051: State-law authority could support an LLC representative's Form 872-P signature

Number
200952051
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Extension by Agreement
Code sections
§ 6229
Ruling dated
December 7, 2009
Publicly released
December 25, 2009

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2009, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2009
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel Advice addresses who may sign a Form 872-P for an LLC serving as the tax matters partner of a TEFRA key-case entity. The advice states that a person may have authority to bind the LLC if the meeting participants had authority under state law to designate that person and the meeting minutes sufficiently recorded the designation. If that authority is uncertain, the Service should protect its position by obtaining Form 872 agreements from the relevant investor corporation and parent, or by obtaining a designation under Treas. Reg. § 301.6229(b)-1.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Who may sign a Form 872-P on behalf of an LLC that is the tax matters partner in a TEFRA key case?
  • Outcome: Advice given
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6229; Treas. Reg. § 301.6229(b)-1; Forms 872 and 872-P

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2009120712000754 Number: 200952051
Release Date: 12/24/2009
Office: --------------
UILC: 6229.02-00

From: --------------------------
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 12:00:09 PM
To: -------------------
Cc: ------------------------------------------
Subject: RE: Signing Official for an LLC that is TMP to a TEFRA Key Case Entity

If the parties present for the meeting of the TMP LLC had, under State law, authority to designate ---------- as the authorized representative of the TMP LLC re execution and filing of federal forms on behalf of the TMP LLC, and, if the minutes of the meeting are, under State law, a sufficient designation of that authority, then yes, ---------should have authority, under State law, to bind the TMP LLC in a Form 872-P re the TEFRA key case entity. See CC-2009-027, question E2 at 10.

If ----------authority under State law to bind the TMP LLC is uncertain and there is no other individual with certain authority under State law to do so, the Service should, for protective purposes, obtain a Form 872 (addressing partnership and affected items) from the ultimate investor subsidiary corporation and its parent. See CC-2009-027, question E4 at 11. Alternatively, the Service could obtain a Treas. Reg. 301.6229(b)-1 designation re the TEFRA key case entity.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace